止血药物对经桡动脉手术后桡动脉压迫方法的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Carlos De Melo Neto, Mariana Kondo Obara, Denise Filippini, Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Dilson Pimentel Junior, Milena Monteiro Mastra, Enrico Prajiante Bertolino, Grace Carvajal Mulatti
{"title":"止血药物对经桡动脉手术后桡动脉压迫方法的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Carlos De Melo Neto, Mariana Kondo Obara, Denise Filippini, Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Dilson Pimentel Junior, Milena Monteiro Mastra, Enrico Prajiante Bertolino, Grace Carvajal Mulatti","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radial artery hemostasis in patients undergoing transradial procedures can be achieved through various compression methods, including manual or mechanical devices, with or without the use of hemostatic agents, and may involve patent hemostasis or concomitant ulnar compression. Previous findings suggest that radial artery compression should be maintained for 120 minutes post-procedure. However, the optimal compression method and the efficiency of hemostatic agents remain uncertain. Therefore, we decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of radial artery compression with adjunctive hemostatic agents versus compression without hemostatic agents on patients following transradial procedures. The systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. The outcomes evaluated were: time to achieve hemostasis (TAH), failure to achieve hemostasis (FAH), 24-hour radial artery occlusion (24-RAO), and hematoma occurrence. We performed subgroup analyses separating manual and mechanical compression with hemostatic agents. 13 randomized controlled trials were included, comprising 6,588 patients. 2,924 (44.4%) patients underwent compression with hemostatic agents, and 3,664 (55.6%) underwent compression without hemostatic agents. The statistical analysis indicated that hemostatic agents were associated with a significantly reduced TAH (MD -86.59 min; 95% CI -106.88 to -66.30; p < 0.01) compared to compressions without hemostatic agents. No statistical difference was found between the methods regarding 24-RAO, FAH, and hematoma occurrence. However, subgroup analyses revealed that, in the manual compression with hemostatic agents subgroup, 24-RAO was also significantly reduced (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). In conclusion, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals that compression with hemostatic agents, compared to compressions without hemostatic agents, can reduce TAH without compromising the occurrence of hematomas for patients following transradial procedures. 24-RAO was also less frequent in patients who underwent manual compression with hemostatic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Hemostatic Agents on Radial Artery Compression Methods Following Transradial Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos De Melo Neto, Mariana Kondo Obara, Denise Filippini, Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Dilson Pimentel Junior, Milena Monteiro Mastra, Enrico Prajiante Bertolino, Grace Carvajal Mulatti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radial artery hemostasis in patients undergoing transradial procedures can be achieved through various compression methods, including manual or mechanical devices, with or without the use of hemostatic agents, and may involve patent hemostasis or concomitant ulnar compression. Previous findings suggest that radial artery compression should be maintained for 120 minutes post-procedure. However, the optimal compression method and the efficiency of hemostatic agents remain uncertain. Therefore, we decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of radial artery compression with adjunctive hemostatic agents versus compression without hemostatic agents on patients following transradial procedures. The systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. The outcomes evaluated were: time to achieve hemostasis (TAH), failure to achieve hemostasis (FAH), 24-hour radial artery occlusion (24-RAO), and hematoma occurrence. We performed subgroup analyses separating manual and mechanical compression with hemostatic agents. 13 randomized controlled trials were included, comprising 6,588 patients. 2,924 (44.4%) patients underwent compression with hemostatic agents, and 3,664 (55.6%) underwent compression without hemostatic agents. The statistical analysis indicated that hemostatic agents were associated with a significantly reduced TAH (MD -86.59 min; 95% CI -106.88 to -66.30; p < 0.01) compared to compressions without hemostatic agents. No statistical difference was found between the methods regarding 24-RAO, FAH, and hematoma occurrence. However, subgroup analyses revealed that, in the manual compression with hemostatic agents subgroup, 24-RAO was also significantly reduced (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). In conclusion, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals that compression with hemostatic agents, compared to compressions without hemostatic agents, can reduce TAH without compromising the occurrence of hematomas for patients following transradial procedures. 24-RAO was also less frequent in patients who underwent manual compression with hemostatic agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经桡动脉手术患者的桡动脉止血可以通过各种压迫方法实现,包括手动或机械装置,使用或不使用止血剂,可能包括未止血或伴随的尺侧压迫。先前的研究结果表明,手术后桡动脉压迫应维持120分钟。然而,最佳的压迫方法和止血药物的效率仍然不确定。因此,我们决定进行一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估桡动脉经桡动脉手术后使用辅助止血药物压迫桡动脉与不使用止血药物压迫桡动脉的疗效。系统检索使用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central数据库。评估结果为:止血时间(TAH)、止血失败(FAH)、24小时桡动脉闭塞(24-RAO)和血肿发生情况。我们进行了分手压和机械压止血的亚组分析。纳入13项随机对照试验,共6588例患者。有止血药物压迫2924例(44.4%),无止血药物压迫3664例(55.6%)。统计学分析表明,与不使用止血药物相比,使用止血药物与明显降低的TAH相关(MD -86.59 min; 95% CI -106.88 ~ -66.30; p < 0.01)。两种方法在24-RAO、FAH和血肿发生率方面无统计学差异。然而,亚组分析显示,在止血药物手动压迫亚组中,24-RAO也显著降低(RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 ~ 0.78)。总之,这项随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示,与不使用止血药物的压迫相比,使用止血药物的压迫可以减少经桡动脉手术后患者的TAH,而不会影响血肿的发生。24-RAO在使用止血剂进行手动压迫的患者中也较少发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy of Hemostatic Agents on Radial Artery Compression Methods Following Transradial Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Radial artery hemostasis in patients undergoing transradial procedures can be achieved through various compression methods, including manual or mechanical devices, with or without the use of hemostatic agents, and may involve patent hemostasis or concomitant ulnar compression. Previous findings suggest that radial artery compression should be maintained for 120 minutes post-procedure. However, the optimal compression method and the efficiency of hemostatic agents remain uncertain. Therefore, we decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of radial artery compression with adjunctive hemostatic agents versus compression without hemostatic agents on patients following transradial procedures. The systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. The outcomes evaluated were: time to achieve hemostasis (TAH), failure to achieve hemostasis (FAH), 24-hour radial artery occlusion (24-RAO), and hematoma occurrence. We performed subgroup analyses separating manual and mechanical compression with hemostatic agents. 13 randomized controlled trials were included, comprising 6,588 patients. 2,924 (44.4%) patients underwent compression with hemostatic agents, and 3,664 (55.6%) underwent compression without hemostatic agents. The statistical analysis indicated that hemostatic agents were associated with a significantly reduced TAH (MD -86.59 min; 95% CI -106.88 to -66.30; p < 0.01) compared to compressions without hemostatic agents. No statistical difference was found between the methods regarding 24-RAO, FAH, and hematoma occurrence. However, subgroup analyses revealed that, in the manual compression with hemostatic agents subgroup, 24-RAO was also significantly reduced (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). In conclusion, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals that compression with hemostatic agents, compared to compressions without hemostatic agents, can reduce TAH without compromising the occurrence of hematomas for patients following transradial procedures. 24-RAO was also less frequent in patients who underwent manual compression with hemostatic agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信