图像引导支气管镜的手术过程建模及工作流程。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tatiana A Rypinski, Roberto F Casal, Parvathy S Pillai, Anshuj Deva, Bhavin Soni, Owais Sarwar, Aaron C Milhorn, Aaron K Jones, Gouthami Chintalapani, Gerhard Kleinszig, David E Ost, Horiana B Grosu, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
{"title":"图像引导支气管镜的手术过程建模及工作流程。","authors":"Tatiana A Rypinski, Roberto F Casal, Parvathy S Pillai, Anshuj Deva, Bhavin Soni, Owais Sarwar, Aaron C Milhorn, Aaron K Jones, Gouthami Chintalapani, Gerhard Kleinszig, David E Ost, Horiana B Grosu, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03861-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emerging technologies to improve transbronchial sampling of lung lesions include mobile C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) and robotic assistance. Surgical Process Modeling (SPM) was used to quantify performance in such procedures performed using a conventional bronchoscope with guidance via 2D fluoroscopy and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) (\"Conventional Bronchoscopy\") compared to robot-assisted bronchoscopy with CBCT guidance (\"CBCT-Guided RAB\").</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Statistical SPMs were implemented for Conventional Bronchoscopy and CBCT-Guided RAB for simulation and analysis of procedural outcomes, including cycle time, radiation dose, and geometric accuracy. The SPMs were parameterized and validated with respect to clinical observation, published literature, and expert input. 9000 simulation runs were computed for each method, analyzing differences in performance and evaluating the influence of body mass index (BMI), lesion location (upper, middle, or lower lobe), and lesion size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SPMs exhibited reasonable agreement with retrospective clinical evaluation of cycle time and dose, and variations in geometric accuracy were consistent with clinical literature. CBCT-Guided RAB resulted in a 14% increase in median cycle time (45.3 min) compared to Conventional Bronchoscopy (39.6 min) and increased median dose to the patient by 3.2 × (41.6 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> compared to 12.9 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>). Geometric targeting improved with CBCT-Guided RAB, reducing the rate of geometric miss from 22% under Conventional Bronchoscopy to 2%. 3D visualization of individual runs gave clear depiction of median and outlier performance and a basis for communicating and standardizing complex workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPMs yielded quantitative performance comparison in lung lesion biopsy by conventional and robot-assisted bronchoscopy. The approach quantified increases in cycle time and dose for CBCT-Guided RAB, accompanied by substantial gains in geometric accuracy. Such modeling provided valuable insight on the benefits of emerging technologies at early stages of implementation and a means to optimize and standardize clinical workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Process Modeling of Workflow and Performance in Image-Guided Bronchoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana A Rypinski, Roberto F Casal, Parvathy S Pillai, Anshuj Deva, Bhavin Soni, Owais Sarwar, Aaron C Milhorn, Aaron K Jones, Gouthami Chintalapani, Gerhard Kleinszig, David E Ost, Horiana B Grosu, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10439-025-03861-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emerging technologies to improve transbronchial sampling of lung lesions include mobile C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) and robotic assistance. Surgical Process Modeling (SPM) was used to quantify performance in such procedures performed using a conventional bronchoscope with guidance via 2D fluoroscopy and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) (\\\"Conventional Bronchoscopy\\\") compared to robot-assisted bronchoscopy with CBCT guidance (\\\"CBCT-Guided RAB\\\").</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Statistical SPMs were implemented for Conventional Bronchoscopy and CBCT-Guided RAB for simulation and analysis of procedural outcomes, including cycle time, radiation dose, and geometric accuracy. The SPMs were parameterized and validated with respect to clinical observation, published literature, and expert input. 9000 simulation runs were computed for each method, analyzing differences in performance and evaluating the influence of body mass index (BMI), lesion location (upper, middle, or lower lobe), and lesion size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SPMs exhibited reasonable agreement with retrospective clinical evaluation of cycle time and dose, and variations in geometric accuracy were consistent with clinical literature. CBCT-Guided RAB resulted in a 14% increase in median cycle time (45.3 min) compared to Conventional Bronchoscopy (39.6 min) and increased median dose to the patient by 3.2 × (41.6 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> compared to 12.9 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>). Geometric targeting improved with CBCT-Guided RAB, reducing the rate of geometric miss from 22% under Conventional Bronchoscopy to 2%. 3D visualization of individual runs gave clear depiction of median and outlier performance and a basis for communicating and standardizing complex workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPMs yielded quantitative performance comparison in lung lesion biopsy by conventional and robot-assisted bronchoscopy. The approach quantified increases in cycle time and dose for CBCT-Guided RAB, accompanied by substantial gains in geometric accuracy. Such modeling provided valuable insight on the benefits of emerging technologies at early stages of implementation and a means to optimize and standardize clinical workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03861-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03861-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:移动c臂锥束CT (CBCT)和机器人辅助是改善肺部病变经支气管采样的新兴技术。手术过程建模(SPM)用于量化在传统支气管镜下通过二维透视和径向探针支气管内超声(RP-EBUS)(“传统支气管镜”)与CBCT引导下机器人辅助支气管镜(“CBCT引导的RAB”)进行的此类手术中的表现。方法:采用统计学SPMs对常规支气管镜检查和cbct引导下的RAB进行模拟和分析手术结果,包括周期时间、辐射剂量和几何精度。根据临床观察、发表的文献和专家意见对SPMs进行参数化和验证。对每种方法进行了9000次模拟运行,分析了性能差异,并评估了身体质量指数(BMI)、病变位置(上、中、下叶)和病变大小的影响。结果:SPMs与临床对周期时间和剂量的回顾性评价有较好的一致性,几何精度的变化与临床文献一致。与传统支气管镜检查(39.6分钟)相比,cbct引导下的RAB导致中位周期时间(45.3分钟)增加14%,患者的中位剂量增加了3.2倍(41.6 Gy cm2与12.9 Gy cm2相比)。cbct引导下的RAB改善了几何靶向,将传统支气管镜下的几何漏诊率从22%降低到2%。单个运行的3D可视化给出了中值和异常值性能的清晰描述,并为复杂工作流程的沟通和标准化奠定了基础。结论:SPMs在常规支气管镜和机器人辅助支气管镜肺病变活检中的定量表现进行了比较。该方法量化了cbct引导下RAB的周期时间和剂量的增加,并伴随着几何精度的大幅提高。这种建模提供了对新兴技术在早期实施阶段的好处的有价值的见解,以及优化和标准化临床工作流程的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Process Modeling of Workflow and Performance in Image-Guided Bronchoscopy.

Purpose: Emerging technologies to improve transbronchial sampling of lung lesions include mobile C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) and robotic assistance. Surgical Process Modeling (SPM) was used to quantify performance in such procedures performed using a conventional bronchoscope with guidance via 2D fluoroscopy and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) ("Conventional Bronchoscopy") compared to robot-assisted bronchoscopy with CBCT guidance ("CBCT-Guided RAB").

Method: Statistical SPMs were implemented for Conventional Bronchoscopy and CBCT-Guided RAB for simulation and analysis of procedural outcomes, including cycle time, radiation dose, and geometric accuracy. The SPMs were parameterized and validated with respect to clinical observation, published literature, and expert input. 9000 simulation runs were computed for each method, analyzing differences in performance and evaluating the influence of body mass index (BMI), lesion location (upper, middle, or lower lobe), and lesion size.

Results: The SPMs exhibited reasonable agreement with retrospective clinical evaluation of cycle time and dose, and variations in geometric accuracy were consistent with clinical literature. CBCT-Guided RAB resulted in a 14% increase in median cycle time (45.3 min) compared to Conventional Bronchoscopy (39.6 min) and increased median dose to the patient by 3.2 × (41.6 Gy cm2 compared to 12.9 Gy cm2). Geometric targeting improved with CBCT-Guided RAB, reducing the rate of geometric miss from 22% under Conventional Bronchoscopy to 2%. 3D visualization of individual runs gave clear depiction of median and outlier performance and a basis for communicating and standardizing complex workflows.

Conclusions: SPMs yielded quantitative performance comparison in lung lesion biopsy by conventional and robot-assisted bronchoscopy. The approach quantified increases in cycle time and dose for CBCT-Guided RAB, accompanied by substantial gains in geometric accuracy. Such modeling provided valuable insight on the benefits of emerging technologies at early stages of implementation and a means to optimize and standardize clinical workflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信