{"title":"药物包覆球囊治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病前血管准备的专用球囊与普通球囊血管成形术比较。","authors":"Xinyuan Wang, Meng Ye, Chunshui He, Xin Fang, Ziheng Wu, Qiang Li, Weihao Shi, Zhenyu Shi, Lianrui Guo, Zibo Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specialty balloons are a novel category of vessel preparation devices. This study compared their effectiveness and safety with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in a real-world setting. A total of 1,574 patients who underwent drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy for femoropopliteal occlusive disease at ten Chinese centers (2021-2023) were analyzed. Propensity score matching generated 434 balanced pairs. Compared with POBA, specialty balloons were associated with a lower stent implantation rate (19% vs 28%; P = 0.003), shorter median stent length (15 cm vs 19 cm; P = 0.017), and use of larger-diameter DCB (4.9 ± 0.5 mm vs 4.8 ± 0.6 mm; P < 0.001). Perioperative complications, ankle-brachial index, hospital stay, and 1-year outcomes-including clinically driven target lesion revascularization, major amputation, mortality, and composite endpoints-did not differ between groups. In the overall cohort, 26% required stenting. Independent predictors of stent implantation were chronic total occlusion, smoking, moderate-to-severe calcification, and greater lesion length, while specialty balloon use was protective. In conclusion, compared with POBA, specialty balloon demonstrated superior vessel preparation outcomes, manifesting as significantly reduced stent implantation requirements, shorter average stent length, and enabling the use of larger-diameter DCB.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specialty Balloons Versus Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty for Vessel Preparation Before Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy in Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyuan Wang, Meng Ye, Chunshui He, Xin Fang, Ziheng Wu, Qiang Li, Weihao Shi, Zhenyu Shi, Lianrui Guo, Zibo Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Specialty balloons are a novel category of vessel preparation devices. This study compared their effectiveness and safety with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in a real-world setting. A total of 1,574 patients who underwent drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy for femoropopliteal occlusive disease at ten Chinese centers (2021-2023) were analyzed. Propensity score matching generated 434 balanced pairs. Compared with POBA, specialty balloons were associated with a lower stent implantation rate (19% vs 28%; P = 0.003), shorter median stent length (15 cm vs 19 cm; P = 0.017), and use of larger-diameter DCB (4.9 ± 0.5 mm vs 4.8 ± 0.6 mm; P < 0.001). Perioperative complications, ankle-brachial index, hospital stay, and 1-year outcomes-including clinically driven target lesion revascularization, major amputation, mortality, and composite endpoints-did not differ between groups. In the overall cohort, 26% required stenting. Independent predictors of stent implantation were chronic total occlusion, smoking, moderate-to-severe calcification, and greater lesion length, while specialty balloon use was protective. In conclusion, compared with POBA, specialty balloon demonstrated superior vessel preparation outcomes, manifesting as significantly reduced stent implantation requirements, shorter average stent length, and enabling the use of larger-diameter DCB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
特种气球是一种新型的容器制备装置。本研究在现实世界中比较了它们与普通旧球囊血管成形术(POBA)的有效性和安全性。本文分析了中国10个中心(2021-2023)接受药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的1574例患者。倾向得分匹配产生434对平衡配对。与POBA相比,专用球囊支架植入率较低(19% vs 28%; P = 0.003),支架中位长度较短(15 cm vs 19 cm; P = 0.017),使用直径较大的DCB(4.9±0.5 mm vs 4.8±0.6 mm; P < 0.001)。围手术期并发症、踝-肱指数、住院时间和1年预后(包括临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术、主要截肢、死亡率和复合终点)在两组之间没有差异。在整个队列中,26%的患者需要支架植入。支架植入的独立预测因素是慢性全闭塞、吸烟、中度至重度钙化和较大的病变长度,而专用球囊使用具有保护作用。综上所述,与POBA相比,专用球囊的血管制备效果更好,可以显著降低支架植入需求,缩短平均支架长度,并且可以使用更大直径的DCB。
Specialty Balloons Versus Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty for Vessel Preparation Before Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy in Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.
Specialty balloons are a novel category of vessel preparation devices. This study compared their effectiveness and safety with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in a real-world setting. A total of 1,574 patients who underwent drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy for femoropopliteal occlusive disease at ten Chinese centers (2021-2023) were analyzed. Propensity score matching generated 434 balanced pairs. Compared with POBA, specialty balloons were associated with a lower stent implantation rate (19% vs 28%; P = 0.003), shorter median stent length (15 cm vs 19 cm; P = 0.017), and use of larger-diameter DCB (4.9 ± 0.5 mm vs 4.8 ± 0.6 mm; P < 0.001). Perioperative complications, ankle-brachial index, hospital stay, and 1-year outcomes-including clinically driven target lesion revascularization, major amputation, mortality, and composite endpoints-did not differ between groups. In the overall cohort, 26% required stenting. Independent predictors of stent implantation were chronic total occlusion, smoking, moderate-to-severe calcification, and greater lesion length, while specialty balloon use was protective. In conclusion, compared with POBA, specialty balloon demonstrated superior vessel preparation outcomes, manifesting as significantly reduced stent implantation requirements, shorter average stent length, and enabling the use of larger-diameter DCB.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.