Yu Liu, Yuting Ren, Yixing Yang, Dejing Feng, Zhiyong Zhang, Li Xu, Xinchun Yang, Pixiong Su, Lefeng Wang
{"title":"主动脉内球囊泵对急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克不同阶段住院死亡率的影响。","authors":"Yu Liu, Yuting Ren, Yixing Yang, Dejing Feng, Zhiyong Zhang, Li Xu, Xinchun Yang, Pixiong Su, Lefeng Wang","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2025.2569023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2012, the randomised trial IABP SHOCK II demonstrated that IABP did not reduce 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock (CS). However, SCAI proposed a new standardised classification of cardiogenic shock in 2019. It is reasonably hypothesised that the use of IABP may have different benefits for patients in different stages of CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AMI patients ≥18 years who had received treatment of implantation of IABP during emergency setting in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between December 2010 and July 2021 were enrolled in this study. CS stages were classified at admission for all eligible cases. During the same period, AMI patients without implantation of IABP were matched with each stage of CS above using propensity score matching (PSM). Data were as follows: Stage B (<i>n</i> = 302), Stage C (<i>n</i> = 290), Stage D (<i>n</i> = 68), and Stage E (<i>n</i> = 32). In-hospital mortality was compared between using and without using IABP at each stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In stage C, the in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the IABP group (31/145, 21.4%) than in the group without IABP (47/145, 32.4%) (OR 0.567, 95% CI, <i>p</i> = .034). In-hospital mortality had no significant difference between use and no-use of IABP in stage B (16.6% vs 14.6%, <i>p</i> = .634), stage D (47.1% vs 38.2%, <i>p</i> = .462), and in stage E (81.3%vs 68.8%, <i>p</i> = .414).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock, IABP has no effect on in-hospital mortality in SCAI stages B, D, and E. However, in SCAI stage C, IABP can reduce in-hospital mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intra-aortic balloon pump on in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock at different stages.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Liu, Yuting Ren, Yixing Yang, Dejing Feng, Zhiyong Zhang, Li Xu, Xinchun Yang, Pixiong Su, Lefeng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00015385.2025.2569023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2012, the randomised trial IABP SHOCK II demonstrated that IABP did not reduce 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock (CS). However, SCAI proposed a new standardised classification of cardiogenic shock in 2019. It is reasonably hypothesised that the use of IABP may have different benefits for patients in different stages of CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AMI patients ≥18 years who had received treatment of implantation of IABP during emergency setting in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between December 2010 and July 2021 were enrolled in this study. CS stages were classified at admission for all eligible cases. During the same period, AMI patients without implantation of IABP were matched with each stage of CS above using propensity score matching (PSM). Data were as follows: Stage B (<i>n</i> = 302), Stage C (<i>n</i> = 290), Stage D (<i>n</i> = 68), and Stage E (<i>n</i> = 32). In-hospital mortality was compared between using and without using IABP at each stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In stage C, the in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the IABP group (31/145, 21.4%) than in the group without IABP (47/145, 32.4%) (OR 0.567, 95% CI, <i>p</i> = .034). In-hospital mortality had no significant difference between use and no-use of IABP in stage B (16.6% vs 14.6%, <i>p</i> = .634), stage D (47.1% vs 38.2%, <i>p</i> = .462), and in stage E (81.3%vs 68.8%, <i>p</i> = .414).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock, IABP has no effect on in-hospital mortality in SCAI stages B, D, and E. However, in SCAI stage C, IABP can reduce in-hospital mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta cardiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta cardiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2025.2569023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cardiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2025.2569023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:2012年,随机试验IABP SHOCK II表明,IABP不能降低急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克(CS)患者的30天死亡率。然而,SCAI在2019年提出了一种新的心源性休克的标准化分类。合理的假设是,使用IABP可能对不同阶段的CS患者有不同的益处。方法:选取2010年12月至2021年7月在北京朝阳医院急诊期间接受IABP植入治疗的≥18岁AMI患者。所有符合条件的病例入院时均按CS分期进行分类。同期,未植入IABP的AMI患者采用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)对上述CS的各个阶段进行匹配。资料如下:B期(n = 302), C期(n = 290), D期(n = 68), E期(n = 32)。比较各阶段使用和未使用IABP的住院死亡率。结果:在C期,IABP组住院死亡率(31/145,21.4%)显著低于无IABP组(47/145,32.4%)(OR 0.567, 95% CI, p = 0.034)。B期使用和未使用IABP的住院死亡率无显著差异(16.6% vs 14.6%, p =。634), D期(47.1% vs 38.2%, p =。462)和E期(81.3%vs 68.8%, p = 0.414)。结论:对于合并心源性休克的急性心肌梗死患者,IABP对SCAI B、D、e期住院死亡率无影响,但在SCAI C期,IABP可降低住院死亡率。
Effect of intra-aortic balloon pump on in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock at different stages.
Background: In 2012, the randomised trial IABP SHOCK II demonstrated that IABP did not reduce 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock (CS). However, SCAI proposed a new standardised classification of cardiogenic shock in 2019. It is reasonably hypothesised that the use of IABP may have different benefits for patients in different stages of CS.
Methods: AMI patients ≥18 years who had received treatment of implantation of IABP during emergency setting in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between December 2010 and July 2021 were enrolled in this study. CS stages were classified at admission for all eligible cases. During the same period, AMI patients without implantation of IABP were matched with each stage of CS above using propensity score matching (PSM). Data were as follows: Stage B (n = 302), Stage C (n = 290), Stage D (n = 68), and Stage E (n = 32). In-hospital mortality was compared between using and without using IABP at each stage.
Results: In stage C, the in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the IABP group (31/145, 21.4%) than in the group without IABP (47/145, 32.4%) (OR 0.567, 95% CI, p = .034). In-hospital mortality had no significant difference between use and no-use of IABP in stage B (16.6% vs 14.6%, p = .634), stage D (47.1% vs 38.2%, p = .462), and in stage E (81.3%vs 68.8%, p = .414).
Conclusions: For patients with acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock, IABP has no effect on in-hospital mortality in SCAI stages B, D, and E. However, in SCAI stage C, IABP can reduce in-hospital mortality.
期刊介绍:
Acta Cardiologica is an international journal. It publishes bi-monthly original, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease including observational studies, clinical trials, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance and tutorials.