Jack P Arnold, Alina Timshina, Qaim Mehdi, John A Bowden
{"title":"不受欢迎的搭便车者:车辆舱室空调和发动机滤清器中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的评估。","authors":"Jack P Arnold, Alina Timshina, Qaim Mehdi, John A Bowden","doi":"10.1039/d5ay01255d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly mobile and widespread chemicals that are associated with an expanding list of adverse health effects. Given their ubiquity and high mobility, dust has become a suitable matrix for assessing potential indoor levels of PFAS. Currently, vehicles represent a largely underexplored source of PFAS contamination in dust. We propose that vehicle cabin air conditioning (AC) filters can be used as opportunistic sampling devices for exploring PFAS levels in dust inherently present within vehicles. This study monitored 47 PFAS in cabin AC filters (<i>n</i> = 10) and engine air filters (as a comparison, <i>n</i> = 10) <i>via</i> high performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Cabin AC filters, which filter air circulated within the passenger compartment, contained higher PFAS concentrations (median ∑PFAS = 92 ng g<sup>-1</sup>) than the engine air filters, which filtered outdoor air feeding into the vehicle engine (median ∑PFAS = 2 ng g<sup>-1</sup>). In cabin AC filters, the dominant PFAS were polyfluoroalkyl phosphate esters (PAPs), which accounted for 45% of ∑PFAS by concentration. In engine filters, the dominant PFAS were fluorotelomer sulfonic acids (dominated by one engine filter) and perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids, which represented 59% and 20% of the ∑PFAS, respectively. This study demonstrated that we are likely exposed to PFAS inside vehicle cabins and that cabin AC filters are a well-suited sampling matrix worth further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":64,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An unwanted hitchhiker: assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in vehicle cabin air conditioner and engine filters.\",\"authors\":\"Jack P Arnold, Alina Timshina, Qaim Mehdi, John A Bowden\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d5ay01255d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly mobile and widespread chemicals that are associated with an expanding list of adverse health effects. Given their ubiquity and high mobility, dust has become a suitable matrix for assessing potential indoor levels of PFAS. Currently, vehicles represent a largely underexplored source of PFAS contamination in dust. We propose that vehicle cabin air conditioning (AC) filters can be used as opportunistic sampling devices for exploring PFAS levels in dust inherently present within vehicles. This study monitored 47 PFAS in cabin AC filters (<i>n</i> = 10) and engine air filters (as a comparison, <i>n</i> = 10) <i>via</i> high performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Cabin AC filters, which filter air circulated within the passenger compartment, contained higher PFAS concentrations (median ∑PFAS = 92 ng g<sup>-1</sup>) than the engine air filters, which filtered outdoor air feeding into the vehicle engine (median ∑PFAS = 2 ng g<sup>-1</sup>). In cabin AC filters, the dominant PFAS were polyfluoroalkyl phosphate esters (PAPs), which accounted for 45% of ∑PFAS by concentration. In engine filters, the dominant PFAS were fluorotelomer sulfonic acids (dominated by one engine filter) and perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids, which represented 59% and 20% of the ∑PFAS, respectively. This study demonstrated that we are likely exposed to PFAS inside vehicle cabins and that cabin AC filters are a well-suited sampling matrix worth further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":64,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ay01255d\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ay01255d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是高度流动和广泛存在的化学品,与越来越多的不良健康影响有关。由于其无处不在和高流动性,粉尘已成为评估室内潜在PFAS水平的合适矩阵。目前,车辆代表了一个很大程度上未被充分开发的PFAS粉尘污染来源。我们建议,车辆舱室空调(AC)过滤器可以作为机会取样装置,用于探索车内固有粉尘中的PFAS水平。本研究采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(HPLC-MS/MS)对机舱交流过滤器(n = 10)和发动机空气过滤器(n = 10)中的47种PFAS进行了监测。用于过滤客舱内循环空气的客舱交流滤清器的PFAS浓度(中位数∑PFAS = 92 ng g-1)高于过滤进入车辆发动机的室外空气的发动机空气滤清器(中位数∑PFAS = 2 ng g-1)。在舱室交流过滤器中,主要的PFAS是聚氟烷基磷酸酯(PAPs),占∑PFAS浓度的45%。在发动机滤清器中,主要的PFAS是氟端聚体磺酸(以一个发动机滤清器为主)和全氟烷基羧酸,分别占∑PFAS的59%和20%。这项研究表明,我们很可能在车辆舱内暴露于PFAS,舱内交流滤波器是一个非常适合的采样矩阵,值得进一步探索。
An unwanted hitchhiker: assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in vehicle cabin air conditioner and engine filters.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly mobile and widespread chemicals that are associated with an expanding list of adverse health effects. Given their ubiquity and high mobility, dust has become a suitable matrix for assessing potential indoor levels of PFAS. Currently, vehicles represent a largely underexplored source of PFAS contamination in dust. We propose that vehicle cabin air conditioning (AC) filters can be used as opportunistic sampling devices for exploring PFAS levels in dust inherently present within vehicles. This study monitored 47 PFAS in cabin AC filters (n = 10) and engine air filters (as a comparison, n = 10) via high performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Cabin AC filters, which filter air circulated within the passenger compartment, contained higher PFAS concentrations (median ∑PFAS = 92 ng g-1) than the engine air filters, which filtered outdoor air feeding into the vehicle engine (median ∑PFAS = 2 ng g-1). In cabin AC filters, the dominant PFAS were polyfluoroalkyl phosphate esters (PAPs), which accounted for 45% of ∑PFAS by concentration. In engine filters, the dominant PFAS were fluorotelomer sulfonic acids (dominated by one engine filter) and perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids, which represented 59% and 20% of the ∑PFAS, respectively. This study demonstrated that we are likely exposed to PFAS inside vehicle cabins and that cabin AC filters are a well-suited sampling matrix worth further exploration.