追求敏捷:如何改变组织的IT项目选择过程

IF 6.3 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Adrian van Raay, Vanessa Cooper, Rohan Sharp, Sophia Duan, Martin Dick
{"title":"追求敏捷:如何改变组织的IT项目选择过程","authors":"Adrian van Raay,&nbsp;Vanessa Cooper,&nbsp;Rohan Sharp,&nbsp;Sophia Duan,&nbsp;Martin Dick","doi":"10.1111/isj.12599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To remain competitive, many organisations are undertaking agile transformations in pursuit of agility. Information technology (IT) plays a pivotal role in supporting organisational agility; thus, it is essential that organisations select the right IT projects in a timely manner to deliver. In practice, though, organisations have struggled with effective decision-making in the IT planning process, especially in competitive environments where there is a need for agile decisions. To guide organisations on how they can transform their IT project selection (ITPS) process to become more agile, we examine two large and well-established Australian organisations and their digital-only subsidiaries launched as agile organisations in start-up style. We explain how the parent companies conduct ITPS and contrast this with the digital-only subsidiaries, highlighting the strengths and challenges each approach presents for agility. We provide an ITPS agility framework that identifies five dimensions that can enable or inhibit agility. These are: <i>ITPS funding approach</i>, <i>number of ITPS decision-makers</i>, <i>granularity of ITPS work-packages</i>, <i>frequency of ITPS process</i> and <i>duration of ITPS process</i>. Our findings indicate that the traditional approach that the parent organisations have taken with these ITPS dimensions has inhibited agility, whereas the ITPS dimensions have been configured to enable agility in their digital-only subsidiaries. We recommend that those responsible for agile transformations of ITPS within their organisations fund teams instead of projects, delegate ITPS decision-making authority, make faster and more frequent ITPS decisions about work-packages that are smaller in scope, and use agility in the right places, as ITPS does not always need to be agile.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 6","pages":"1582-1602"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12599","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Pursuit of Agility: How to Transform Your Organisation's IT Project Selection Process\",\"authors\":\"Adrian van Raay,&nbsp;Vanessa Cooper,&nbsp;Rohan Sharp,&nbsp;Sophia Duan,&nbsp;Martin Dick\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/isj.12599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To remain competitive, many organisations are undertaking agile transformations in pursuit of agility. Information technology (IT) plays a pivotal role in supporting organisational agility; thus, it is essential that organisations select the right IT projects in a timely manner to deliver. In practice, though, organisations have struggled with effective decision-making in the IT planning process, especially in competitive environments where there is a need for agile decisions. To guide organisations on how they can transform their IT project selection (ITPS) process to become more agile, we examine two large and well-established Australian organisations and their digital-only subsidiaries launched as agile organisations in start-up style. We explain how the parent companies conduct ITPS and contrast this with the digital-only subsidiaries, highlighting the strengths and challenges each approach presents for agility. We provide an ITPS agility framework that identifies five dimensions that can enable or inhibit agility. These are: <i>ITPS funding approach</i>, <i>number of ITPS decision-makers</i>, <i>granularity of ITPS work-packages</i>, <i>frequency of ITPS process</i> and <i>duration of ITPS process</i>. Our findings indicate that the traditional approach that the parent organisations have taken with these ITPS dimensions has inhibited agility, whereas the ITPS dimensions have been configured to enable agility in their digital-only subsidiaries. We recommend that those responsible for agile transformations of ITPS within their organisations fund teams instead of projects, delegate ITPS decision-making authority, make faster and more frequent ITPS decisions about work-packages that are smaller in scope, and use agility in the right places, as ITPS does not always need to be agile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 6\",\"pages\":\"1582-1602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12599\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了保持竞争力,许多组织正在进行敏捷转型以追求敏捷性。信息技术(IT)在支持组织敏捷性方面起着关键作用;因此,组织必须及时选择正确的it项目来交付。然而,在实践中,组织在IT规划过程中很难做出有效的决策,特别是在需要敏捷决策的竞争环境中。为了指导组织如何将其IT项目选择(ITPS)流程转变为更加敏捷,我们研究了两个大型且成熟的澳大利亚组织及其以初创风格启动的敏捷组织的数字子公司。我们解释了母公司是如何实施ITPS的,并将其与纯数字子公司进行了对比,强调了每种方法为敏捷性带来的优势和挑战。我们提供了一个ITPS敏捷性框架,该框架确定了可以启用或禁用敏捷性的五个维度。这些是:ITPS的资助方式、ITPS决策者的数量、ITPS工作包的粒度、ITPS过程的频率和ITPS过程的持续时间。我们的研究结果表明,母公司对这些ITPS维度采取的传统方法抑制了敏捷性,而ITPS维度已被配置为在其纯数字化子公司中实现敏捷性。我们建议那些在他们的组织中负责ITPS敏捷转换的人资助团队而不是项目,授权ITPS决策权,对范围较小的工作包做出更快更频繁的ITPS决策,并在正确的地方使用敏捷性,因为ITPS并不总是需要敏捷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In Pursuit of Agility: How to Transform Your Organisation's IT Project Selection Process

In Pursuit of Agility: How to Transform Your Organisation's IT Project Selection Process

To remain competitive, many organisations are undertaking agile transformations in pursuit of agility. Information technology (IT) plays a pivotal role in supporting organisational agility; thus, it is essential that organisations select the right IT projects in a timely manner to deliver. In practice, though, organisations have struggled with effective decision-making in the IT planning process, especially in competitive environments where there is a need for agile decisions. To guide organisations on how they can transform their IT project selection (ITPS) process to become more agile, we examine two large and well-established Australian organisations and their digital-only subsidiaries launched as agile organisations in start-up style. We explain how the parent companies conduct ITPS and contrast this with the digital-only subsidiaries, highlighting the strengths and challenges each approach presents for agility. We provide an ITPS agility framework that identifies five dimensions that can enable or inhibit agility. These are: ITPS funding approach, number of ITPS decision-makers, granularity of ITPS work-packages, frequency of ITPS process and duration of ITPS process. Our findings indicate that the traditional approach that the parent organisations have taken with these ITPS dimensions has inhibited agility, whereas the ITPS dimensions have been configured to enable agility in their digital-only subsidiaries. We recommend that those responsible for agile transformations of ITPS within their organisations fund teams instead of projects, delegate ITPS decision-making authority, make faster and more frequent ITPS decisions about work-packages that are smaller in scope, and use agility in the right places, as ITPS does not always need to be agile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信