体外鼻中隔成形术治疗严重鼻中隔偏曲:系统回顾

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Matteo Lazzeroni, Jèrôme René Lechien, Mario Lentini, Pasquale Capaccio, Alberto Maria Saibene, Michele Gaffuri, Antonio Mario Bulfamante, Luca Giovanni Locatello, Portelli Tancredi, Ingrassia Angelo, Federico Sireci, Antonino Maniaci
{"title":"体外鼻中隔成形术治疗严重鼻中隔偏曲:系统回顾","authors":"Matteo Lazzeroni,&nbsp;Jèrôme René Lechien,&nbsp;Mario Lentini,&nbsp;Pasquale Capaccio,&nbsp;Alberto Maria Saibene,&nbsp;Michele Gaffuri,&nbsp;Antonio Mario Bulfamante,&nbsp;Luca Giovanni Locatello,&nbsp;Portelli Tancredi,&nbsp;Ingrassia Angelo,&nbsp;Federico Sireci,&nbsp;Antonino Maniaci","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) is a surgical technique used to address severe nasal septal deviations, especially in patients in whom in situ septoplasty (ISS) is insufficient. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ECS techniques, including conventional and modified ECS methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Studies on ECS techniques were included. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOTS framework. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Functional and aesthetic improvements were primary outcomes, while complication rates represented secondary outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two studies (retrospective, prospective, and RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. ECS was associated with significant functional improvement, as assessed by nasal obstruction scores measured by NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry. Aesthetic results were also satisfactory, with a significant improvement in the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, and the tip projection index, as well as good patients' satisfaction. Complications were rare, with few cases of septal perforation, graft resorption, or residual nasal obstructive symptoms. Evidence strength was limited considering the majority of included studies were retrospective, with inherent bias risks, small sample sizes, and inconsistent follow-up durations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ECS may be a successful and safe method for severe septal deviation correction, providing functional and aesthetic results with a low complication rate. More high-quality, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up will be required for a standardization of surgical protocols and outcome measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>2.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70280","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Severe Nasal Septal Deviation: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Lazzeroni,&nbsp;Jèrôme René Lechien,&nbsp;Mario Lentini,&nbsp;Pasquale Capaccio,&nbsp;Alberto Maria Saibene,&nbsp;Michele Gaffuri,&nbsp;Antonio Mario Bulfamante,&nbsp;Luca Giovanni Locatello,&nbsp;Portelli Tancredi,&nbsp;Ingrassia Angelo,&nbsp;Federico Sireci,&nbsp;Antonino Maniaci\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) is a surgical technique used to address severe nasal septal deviations, especially in patients in whom in situ septoplasty (ISS) is insufficient. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ECS techniques, including conventional and modified ECS methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Studies on ECS techniques were included. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOTS framework. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Functional and aesthetic improvements were primary outcomes, while complication rates represented secondary outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-two studies (retrospective, prospective, and RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. ECS was associated with significant functional improvement, as assessed by nasal obstruction scores measured by NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry. Aesthetic results were also satisfactory, with a significant improvement in the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, and the tip projection index, as well as good patients' satisfaction. Complications were rare, with few cases of septal perforation, graft resorption, or residual nasal obstructive symptoms. Evidence strength was limited considering the majority of included studies were retrospective, with inherent bias risks, small sample sizes, and inconsistent follow-up durations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>ECS may be a successful and safe method for severe septal deviation correction, providing functional and aesthetic results with a low complication rate. More high-quality, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up will be required for a standardization of surgical protocols and outcome measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>2.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70280\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70280\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的体外鼻中隔成形术(ECS)是一种用于治疗严重鼻中隔偏曲的手术技术,特别是在原位鼻中隔成形术(ISS)不足的患者中。本系统综述评估了ECS技术的有效性、安全性和临床结果,包括传统的和改进的ECS方法。数据来源:PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和Embase的prisma兼容系统搜索。方法纳入ECS技术的研究。使用PICOTS框架建立资格标准。使用Cochrane风险偏倚2工具和Newcastle-Ottawa量表评估研究质量。功能和美观的改善是主要结果,而并发症率是次要结果。结果22项研究(回顾性、前瞻性和随机对照试验)符合纳入标准。通过鼻塞评分、声学鼻测量和鼻流测量来评估,ECS与显著的功能改善相关。美观效果也令人满意,鼻额角、鼻唇角、鼻尖投影指数均有明显改善,患者满意度良好。并发症很少,很少有鼻中隔穿孔、移植物吸收或残留的鼻塞症状。考虑到纳入的大多数研究是回顾性的,具有固有的偏倚风险,样本量小,随访时间不一致,证据强度有限。结论ECS是一种安全有效的重度鼻中隔矫治方法,具有良好的功能和美观性,并发症发生率低。需要更多高质量、多中心、长期随访的随机对照试验来标准化手术方案和结果测量。证据级别2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Severe Nasal Septal Deviation: A Systematic Review

Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Severe Nasal Septal Deviation: A Systematic Review

Objective

Extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) is a surgical technique used to address severe nasal septal deviations, especially in patients in whom in situ septoplasty (ISS) is insufficient. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ECS techniques, including conventional and modified ECS methods.

Data Sources

PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.

Methods

Studies on ECS techniques were included. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOTS framework. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Functional and aesthetic improvements were primary outcomes, while complication rates represented secondary outcomes.

Results

Twenty-two studies (retrospective, prospective, and RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. ECS was associated with significant functional improvement, as assessed by nasal obstruction scores measured by NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry. Aesthetic results were also satisfactory, with a significant improvement in the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, and the tip projection index, as well as good patients' satisfaction. Complications were rare, with few cases of septal perforation, graft resorption, or residual nasal obstructive symptoms. Evidence strength was limited considering the majority of included studies were retrospective, with inherent bias risks, small sample sizes, and inconsistent follow-up durations.

Conclusions

ECS may be a successful and safe method for severe septal deviation correction, providing functional and aesthetic results with a low complication rate. More high-quality, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up will be required for a standardization of surgical protocols and outcome measures.

Level of Evidence

2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信