Matteo Lazzeroni, Jèrôme René Lechien, Mario Lentini, Pasquale Capaccio, Alberto Maria Saibene, Michele Gaffuri, Antonio Mario Bulfamante, Luca Giovanni Locatello, Portelli Tancredi, Ingrassia Angelo, Federico Sireci, Antonino Maniaci
{"title":"体外鼻中隔成形术治疗严重鼻中隔偏曲:系统回顾","authors":"Matteo Lazzeroni, Jèrôme René Lechien, Mario Lentini, Pasquale Capaccio, Alberto Maria Saibene, Michele Gaffuri, Antonio Mario Bulfamante, Luca Giovanni Locatello, Portelli Tancredi, Ingrassia Angelo, Federico Sireci, Antonino Maniaci","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) is a surgical technique used to address severe nasal septal deviations, especially in patients in whom in situ septoplasty (ISS) is insufficient. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ECS techniques, including conventional and modified ECS methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Studies on ECS techniques were included. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOTS framework. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Functional and aesthetic improvements were primary outcomes, while complication rates represented secondary outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two studies (retrospective, prospective, and RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. ECS was associated with significant functional improvement, as assessed by nasal obstruction scores measured by NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry. Aesthetic results were also satisfactory, with a significant improvement in the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, and the tip projection index, as well as good patients' satisfaction. Complications were rare, with few cases of septal perforation, graft resorption, or residual nasal obstructive symptoms. Evidence strength was limited considering the majority of included studies were retrospective, with inherent bias risks, small sample sizes, and inconsistent follow-up durations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ECS may be a successful and safe method for severe septal deviation correction, providing functional and aesthetic results with a low complication rate. More high-quality, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up will be required for a standardization of surgical protocols and outcome measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>2.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70280","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Severe Nasal Septal Deviation: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Lazzeroni, Jèrôme René Lechien, Mario Lentini, Pasquale Capaccio, Alberto Maria Saibene, Michele Gaffuri, Antonio Mario Bulfamante, Luca Giovanni Locatello, Portelli Tancredi, Ingrassia Angelo, Federico Sireci, Antonino Maniaci\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) is a surgical technique used to address severe nasal septal deviations, especially in patients in whom in situ septoplasty (ISS) is insufficient. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ECS techniques, including conventional and modified ECS methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Studies on ECS techniques were included. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOTS framework. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Functional and aesthetic improvements were primary outcomes, while complication rates represented secondary outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-two studies (retrospective, prospective, and RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. ECS was associated with significant functional improvement, as assessed by nasal obstruction scores measured by NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry. Aesthetic results were also satisfactory, with a significant improvement in the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, and the tip projection index, as well as good patients' satisfaction. Complications were rare, with few cases of septal perforation, graft resorption, or residual nasal obstructive symptoms. Evidence strength was limited considering the majority of included studies were retrospective, with inherent bias risks, small sample sizes, and inconsistent follow-up durations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>ECS may be a successful and safe method for severe septal deviation correction, providing functional and aesthetic results with a low complication rate. More high-quality, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up will be required for a standardization of surgical protocols and outcome measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>2.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70280\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70280\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的体外鼻中隔成形术(ECS)是一种用于治疗严重鼻中隔偏曲的手术技术,特别是在原位鼻中隔成形术(ISS)不足的患者中。本系统综述评估了ECS技术的有效性、安全性和临床结果,包括传统的和改进的ECS方法。数据来源:PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和Embase的prisma兼容系统搜索。方法纳入ECS技术的研究。使用PICOTS框架建立资格标准。使用Cochrane风险偏倚2工具和Newcastle-Ottawa量表评估研究质量。功能和美观的改善是主要结果,而并发症率是次要结果。结果22项研究(回顾性、前瞻性和随机对照试验)符合纳入标准。通过鼻塞评分、声学鼻测量和鼻流测量来评估,ECS与显著的功能改善相关。美观效果也令人满意,鼻额角、鼻唇角、鼻尖投影指数均有明显改善,患者满意度良好。并发症很少,很少有鼻中隔穿孔、移植物吸收或残留的鼻塞症状。考虑到纳入的大多数研究是回顾性的,具有固有的偏倚风险,样本量小,随访时间不一致,证据强度有限。结论ECS是一种安全有效的重度鼻中隔矫治方法,具有良好的功能和美观性,并发症发生率低。需要更多高质量、多中心、长期随访的随机对照试验来标准化手术方案和结果测量。证据级别2。
Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Severe Nasal Septal Deviation: A Systematic Review
Objective
Extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) is a surgical technique used to address severe nasal septal deviations, especially in patients in whom in situ septoplasty (ISS) is insufficient. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ECS techniques, including conventional and modified ECS methods.
Data Sources
PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.
Methods
Studies on ECS techniques were included. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOTS framework. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Functional and aesthetic improvements were primary outcomes, while complication rates represented secondary outcomes.
Results
Twenty-two studies (retrospective, prospective, and RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. ECS was associated with significant functional improvement, as assessed by nasal obstruction scores measured by NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry. Aesthetic results were also satisfactory, with a significant improvement in the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, and the tip projection index, as well as good patients' satisfaction. Complications were rare, with few cases of septal perforation, graft resorption, or residual nasal obstructive symptoms. Evidence strength was limited considering the majority of included studies were retrospective, with inherent bias risks, small sample sizes, and inconsistent follow-up durations.
Conclusions
ECS may be a successful and safe method for severe septal deviation correction, providing functional and aesthetic results with a low complication rate. More high-quality, multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up will be required for a standardization of surgical protocols and outcome measures.