Prafull P. Yadav, Rajmal Jat, Sachin D. Ghude, Gaurav Govardhan, Rajesh Kumar, Sreyashi Debnath, Gayatri Kalita, Chinmay Jena, V. K. Soni, A. Jayakumar, T. J. Anurose, Shweta Bhati, Alqamah Sayeed, Junhyeon Seo, Pawan Gupta, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Johannes Flemming, Kamaljit Ray, S. D. Atri
{"title":"评估区域和全球PM2.5准确预测和空气质量指数评估模型在印度德里的表现","authors":"Prafull P. Yadav, Rajmal Jat, Sachin D. Ghude, Gaurav Govardhan, Rajesh Kumar, Sreyashi Debnath, Gayatri Kalita, Chinmay Jena, V. K. Soni, A. Jayakumar, T. J. Anurose, Shweta Bhati, Alqamah Sayeed, Junhyeon Seo, Pawan Gupta, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Johannes Flemming, Kamaljit Ray, S. D. Atri","doi":"10.1029/2025JD043719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate forecasting of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm) is essential for effective air quality management, particularly in urban areas such as Delhi, which frequently experience severe pollution episodes. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of regional and global forecasting models for PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and the associated Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi, India. A multi-model assessment was conducted using three regional models (WRF-Chem, SILAM, and DM-Chem) and four global models (IFS, GEOS-FP, GEFS-Aerosols, and the machine learning-based GEOS-ML). Forecasts from these models were validated against hourly in situ measurements from 39 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) stations in Delhi. Results revealed that the Air Quality Early Warning System (AQEWS) based on WRF-Chem exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (Performance Index, PI = 87), with minimal deviations from observations. The GEOS-ML model (PI = 70) effectively captured key variations using a machine learning approach. DM-Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61) showed reasonable agreement, whereas IFS (PI = 60), GEOS-FP (PI = 52), and GEFS-Aerosols (PI = 47) captured broader trends with varying accuracy. SILAM (PI = 58) exhibited notable discrepancies during high-pollution events. This study underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of forecasting systems to enhance air quality prediction in polluted urban environments such as Delhi. Identifying the most reliable models supports data-driven decision-making for air pollution mitigation and public health protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Performance of Regional and Global Forecasting Models for Accurate PM2.5 Prediction and Air Quality Index Assessment in Delhi, India\",\"authors\":\"Prafull P. Yadav, Rajmal Jat, Sachin D. Ghude, Gaurav Govardhan, Rajesh Kumar, Sreyashi Debnath, Gayatri Kalita, Chinmay Jena, V. K. Soni, A. Jayakumar, T. J. Anurose, Shweta Bhati, Alqamah Sayeed, Junhyeon Seo, Pawan Gupta, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Johannes Flemming, Kamaljit Ray, S. D. Atri\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JD043719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate forecasting of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm) is essential for effective air quality management, particularly in urban areas such as Delhi, which frequently experience severe pollution episodes. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of regional and global forecasting models for PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and the associated Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi, India. A multi-model assessment was conducted using three regional models (WRF-Chem, SILAM, and DM-Chem) and four global models (IFS, GEOS-FP, GEFS-Aerosols, and the machine learning-based GEOS-ML). Forecasts from these models were validated against hourly in situ measurements from 39 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) stations in Delhi. Results revealed that the Air Quality Early Warning System (AQEWS) based on WRF-Chem exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (Performance Index, PI = 87), with minimal deviations from observations. The GEOS-ML model (PI = 70) effectively captured key variations using a machine learning approach. DM-Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61) showed reasonable agreement, whereas IFS (PI = 60), GEOS-FP (PI = 52), and GEFS-Aerosols (PI = 47) captured broader trends with varying accuracy. SILAM (PI = 58) exhibited notable discrepancies during high-pollution events. This study underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of forecasting systems to enhance air quality prediction in polluted urban environments such as Delhi. Identifying the most reliable models supports data-driven decision-making for air pollution mitigation and public health protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"130 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD043719\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD043719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Performance of Regional and Global Forecasting Models for Accurate PM2.5 Prediction and Air Quality Index Assessment in Delhi, India
Accurate forecasting of PM2.5 (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm) is essential for effective air quality management, particularly in urban areas such as Delhi, which frequently experience severe pollution episodes. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of regional and global forecasting models for PM2.5 concentrations and the associated Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi, India. A multi-model assessment was conducted using three regional models (WRF-Chem, SILAM, and DM-Chem) and four global models (IFS, GEOS-FP, GEFS-Aerosols, and the machine learning-based GEOS-ML). Forecasts from these models were validated against hourly in situ measurements from 39 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) stations in Delhi. Results revealed that the Air Quality Early Warning System (AQEWS) based on WRF-Chem exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (Performance Index, PI = 87), with minimal deviations from observations. The GEOS-ML model (PI = 70) effectively captured key variations using a machine learning approach. DM-Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61) showed reasonable agreement, whereas IFS (PI = 60), GEOS-FP (PI = 52), and GEFS-Aerosols (PI = 47) captured broader trends with varying accuracy. SILAM (PI = 58) exhibited notable discrepancies during high-pollution events. This study underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of forecasting systems to enhance air quality prediction in polluted urban environments such as Delhi. Identifying the most reliable models supports data-driven decision-making for air pollution mitigation and public health protection.
期刊介绍:
JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.