不浪费时间:水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施后时间重新分配的综合证据

IF 1.7 4区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Hugh Sharma Waddington, Sarah K. Dickin, Kishore Basak, Saranya Mohandas, Biljana Macura
{"title":"不浪费时间:水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施后时间重新分配的综合证据","authors":"Hugh Sharma Waddington,&nbsp;Sarah K. Dickin,&nbsp;Kishore Basak,&nbsp;Saranya Mohandas,&nbsp;Biljana Macura","doi":"10.1002/jid.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large amounts of time are wasted globally accessing water for domestic uses and sanitation, disproportionately impacting women and girls. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on evidence mapping initiatives. Our synthesis of the evidence found a mean reduction of 15 min per trip for water supply interventions, and 3 min per trip for sanitation interventions, adding up to around 8 h per week and 3.5 h per week respectively at the household level. Time-savings from improvements in the quantity of water supplied were very large, whether improved water supplies were provided at the household or community level. In contrast, studies on water treatment reported small increases in time, and there were no studies that reported reallocation following hygiene interventions. We found limited evidence on time reallocation to other activities, but disaggregated data showed girls were significantly more likely to attend school following interventions that improved water supply, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) at the household level. Of note, nearly half of the eligible studies collecting information about time use were identified in the grey literature. This policy-relevant evidence contributes to the case for increasing investments in appropriate water supply and sanitation interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Development","volume":"37 7","pages":"1503-1524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jid.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Time to Waste: A Synthesis of Evidence on Time Reallocation Following Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Sharma Waddington,&nbsp;Sarah K. Dickin,&nbsp;Kishore Basak,&nbsp;Saranya Mohandas,&nbsp;Biljana Macura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jid.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Large amounts of time are wasted globally accessing water for domestic uses and sanitation, disproportionately impacting women and girls. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on evidence mapping initiatives. Our synthesis of the evidence found a mean reduction of 15 min per trip for water supply interventions, and 3 min per trip for sanitation interventions, adding up to around 8 h per week and 3.5 h per week respectively at the household level. Time-savings from improvements in the quantity of water supplied were very large, whether improved water supplies were provided at the household or community level. In contrast, studies on water treatment reported small increases in time, and there were no studies that reported reallocation following hygiene interventions. We found limited evidence on time reallocation to other activities, but disaggregated data showed girls were significantly more likely to attend school following interventions that improved water supply, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) at the household level. Of note, nearly half of the eligible studies collecting information about time use were identified in the grey literature. This policy-relevant evidence contributes to the case for increasing investments in appropriate water supply and sanitation interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Development\",\"volume\":\"37 7\",\"pages\":\"1503-1524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jid.70015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.70015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球在获取家庭用水和卫生用水方面浪费了大量时间,对妇女和女童的影响尤为严重。我们进行了一项基于证据映射计划的系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们综合证据发现,供水干预措施每趟平均减少15分钟,卫生干预措施每趟平均减少3分钟,在家庭层面上每周分别减少约8小时和3.5小时。无论是在家庭一级还是在社区一级改善供水,改善供水数量所节省的时间都非常多。相比之下,关于水处理的研究报告了时间的小幅增加,并且没有研究报告了卫生干预后的重新分配。我们发现将时间重新分配到其他活动的证据有限,但分类数据显示,在家庭层面改善供水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)的干预措施后,女孩上学的可能性明显提高。值得注意的是,在收集时间使用信息的合格研究中,有近一半是在灰色文献中发现的。这一与政策相关的证据有助于增加对适当供水和卫生干预措施的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

No Time to Waste: A Synthesis of Evidence on Time Reallocation Following Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions

No Time to Waste: A Synthesis of Evidence on Time Reallocation Following Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions

Large amounts of time are wasted globally accessing water for domestic uses and sanitation, disproportionately impacting women and girls. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on evidence mapping initiatives. Our synthesis of the evidence found a mean reduction of 15 min per trip for water supply interventions, and 3 min per trip for sanitation interventions, adding up to around 8 h per week and 3.5 h per week respectively at the household level. Time-savings from improvements in the quantity of water supplied were very large, whether improved water supplies were provided at the household or community level. In contrast, studies on water treatment reported small increases in time, and there were no studies that reported reallocation following hygiene interventions. We found limited evidence on time reallocation to other activities, but disaggregated data showed girls were significantly more likely to attend school following interventions that improved water supply, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) at the household level. Of note, nearly half of the eligible studies collecting information about time use were identified in the grey literature. This policy-relevant evidence contributes to the case for increasing investments in appropriate water supply and sanitation interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to publish the best research on international development issues in a form that is accessible to practitioners and policy-makers as well as to an academic audience. The main focus is on the social sciences - economics, politics, international relations, sociology and anthropology, as well as development studies - but we also welcome articles that blend the natural and social sciences in addressing the challenges for development. The Journal does not represent any particular school, analytical technique or methodological approach, but aims to publish high quality contributions to ideas, frameworks, policy and practice, including in transitional countries and underdeveloped areas of the Global North as well as the Global South.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信