水库管理对泥沙绕道隧道效率的影响——以瑞士索利斯水库为例

IF 3.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mohammadreza Maddahi , Robert Michael Boes , Ismail Albayrak
{"title":"水库管理对泥沙绕道隧道效率的影响——以瑞士索利斯水库为例","authors":"Mohammadreza Maddahi ,&nbsp;Robert Michael Boes ,&nbsp;Ismail Albayrak","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsrc.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sediment bypass tunnels (SBTs) divert sediment-laden flows from river systems around reservoirs to the tailwater reach and thus help prevent reservoir sedimentation. However, their bypassing efficiency largely depends on reservoir operation, particularly for type-B SBTs with an intake located within the reservoir. The present study aims to investigate the effect of reservoir operation conditions on the bypass efficiency of a type-B SBT at the case study Solis Reservoir in Switzerland. Four annual measurement campaigns were conducted in the reservoir between 2018 and 2021. Flow velocities were measured, and bathymetry was mapped using an acoustic Doppler current profiler at high spatial resolution along the elongated and narrow reservoir. In- and outflow sediment volumes were measured using turbidimeters and Swiss plate geophone systems and estimated by using state-of-the-art sediment transport equations, respectively. Two floods with one-year and five-year return periods, respectively, in 2019 and a one-year return period flood in 2020 were captured. The results show that the average sediment bypass efficiency, i.e. the ratio of outflowing to inflowing sediment volumes, increased from 17% to 88% by operating SBT. The results highlight that the SBT bypass efficiency is highly dependent on the reservoir water level. For high efficiencies above 170%, an optimal value of the reservoir drawdown level is around 813 m asl. Bypass efficiencies up to 250% indicate that the type-B SBT does not only stop sedimentation but can also help regain active storage volume of the reservoir if operated under optimal conditions in terms of reservoir water level. Without SBT operation, ca. 205,000 m<sup>3</sup> of net sediment deposition volume would have resulted in an aggradation of 1 m on average from 2018 to 2021. The findings of this study contribute to improved SBT and reservoir operation regimes in terms of reducing the sedimentation rates and prolonging the reservoir lifetimes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50290,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sediment Research","volume":"40 5","pages":"Pages 761-776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of reservoir management on the efficiency of a sediment bypass tunnel: Case study of Solis Reservoir, Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Mohammadreza Maddahi ,&nbsp;Robert Michael Boes ,&nbsp;Ismail Albayrak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijsrc.2025.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sediment bypass tunnels (SBTs) divert sediment-laden flows from river systems around reservoirs to the tailwater reach and thus help prevent reservoir sedimentation. However, their bypassing efficiency largely depends on reservoir operation, particularly for type-B SBTs with an intake located within the reservoir. The present study aims to investigate the effect of reservoir operation conditions on the bypass efficiency of a type-B SBT at the case study Solis Reservoir in Switzerland. Four annual measurement campaigns were conducted in the reservoir between 2018 and 2021. Flow velocities were measured, and bathymetry was mapped using an acoustic Doppler current profiler at high spatial resolution along the elongated and narrow reservoir. In- and outflow sediment volumes were measured using turbidimeters and Swiss plate geophone systems and estimated by using state-of-the-art sediment transport equations, respectively. Two floods with one-year and five-year return periods, respectively, in 2019 and a one-year return period flood in 2020 were captured. The results show that the average sediment bypass efficiency, i.e. the ratio of outflowing to inflowing sediment volumes, increased from 17% to 88% by operating SBT. The results highlight that the SBT bypass efficiency is highly dependent on the reservoir water level. For high efficiencies above 170%, an optimal value of the reservoir drawdown level is around 813 m asl. Bypass efficiencies up to 250% indicate that the type-B SBT does not only stop sedimentation but can also help regain active storage volume of the reservoir if operated under optimal conditions in terms of reservoir water level. Without SBT operation, ca. 205,000 m<sup>3</sup> of net sediment deposition volume would have resulted in an aggradation of 1 m on average from 2018 to 2021. The findings of this study contribute to improved SBT and reservoir operation regimes in terms of reducing the sedimentation rates and prolonging the reservoir lifetimes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sediment Research\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 761-776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sediment Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627925000538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sediment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627925000538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

泥沙绕道隧道(SBTs)将水库周围河流系统的含沙水流转移到尾水段,从而有助于防止水库沉积。然而,它们的旁路效率在很大程度上取决于油藏的运行情况,特别是对于进水口位于油藏内的b型sbt。以瑞士Solis油藏为例,研究了油藏运行条件对b型SBT旁路效率的影响。在2018年至2021年期间,在水库进行了四次年度测量活动。测量了流速,并利用声波多普勒电流剖面仪在高空间分辨率下沿着细长狭窄的储层绘制了测深图。流入和流出的泥沙体积分别使用浊度计和瑞士板块检波器系统进行测量,并使用最先进的泥沙输送方程进行估计。捕获了2019年1年和5年重现期的两次洪水,以及2020年1年重现期的一次洪水。结果表明:采用SBT后,平均泥沙旁通效率(即出沙体积与入沙体积之比)由17%提高到88%;结果表明,SBT旁路效率高度依赖于水库水位。对于170%以上的高效率,油藏降水位差的最佳值约为813 m / l。旁路效率高达250%,这表明b型SBT不仅可以阻止沉积,而且如果在水库水位的最佳条件下运行,还可以帮助恢复水库的活跃储存量。如果没有SBT操作,从2018年到2021年,约20.5万立方米的净泥沙沉积量将导致平均1米的淤积。本研究的结果有助于改善SBT和油藏操作制度,以降低沉积速率和延长油藏寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of reservoir management on the efficiency of a sediment bypass tunnel: Case study of Solis Reservoir, Switzerland
Sediment bypass tunnels (SBTs) divert sediment-laden flows from river systems around reservoirs to the tailwater reach and thus help prevent reservoir sedimentation. However, their bypassing efficiency largely depends on reservoir operation, particularly for type-B SBTs with an intake located within the reservoir. The present study aims to investigate the effect of reservoir operation conditions on the bypass efficiency of a type-B SBT at the case study Solis Reservoir in Switzerland. Four annual measurement campaigns were conducted in the reservoir between 2018 and 2021. Flow velocities were measured, and bathymetry was mapped using an acoustic Doppler current profiler at high spatial resolution along the elongated and narrow reservoir. In- and outflow sediment volumes were measured using turbidimeters and Swiss plate geophone systems and estimated by using state-of-the-art sediment transport equations, respectively. Two floods with one-year and five-year return periods, respectively, in 2019 and a one-year return period flood in 2020 were captured. The results show that the average sediment bypass efficiency, i.e. the ratio of outflowing to inflowing sediment volumes, increased from 17% to 88% by operating SBT. The results highlight that the SBT bypass efficiency is highly dependent on the reservoir water level. For high efficiencies above 170%, an optimal value of the reservoir drawdown level is around 813 m asl. Bypass efficiencies up to 250% indicate that the type-B SBT does not only stop sedimentation but can also help regain active storage volume of the reservoir if operated under optimal conditions in terms of reservoir water level. Without SBT operation, ca. 205,000 m3 of net sediment deposition volume would have resulted in an aggradation of 1 m on average from 2018 to 2021. The findings of this study contribute to improved SBT and reservoir operation regimes in terms of reducing the sedimentation rates and prolonging the reservoir lifetimes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sediment Research
International Journal of Sediment Research 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
88
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Sediment Research, the Official Journal of The International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation and The World Association for Sedimentation and Erosion Research, publishes scientific and technical papers on all aspects of erosion and sedimentation interpreted in its widest sense. The subject matter is to include not only the mechanics of sediment transport and fluvial processes, but also what is related to geography, geomorphology, soil erosion, watershed management, sedimentology, environmental and ecological impacts of sedimentation, social and economical effects of sedimentation and its assessment, etc. Special attention is paid to engineering problems related to sedimentation and erosion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信