{"title":"管理半自然草原的挑战和解决方案:来自爱沙尼亚的见解","authors":"Liis Kasari-Toussaint , Rufus Trepp , Krista Takkis , Aveliina Helm , Annely Holm , Bert Holm , Triin Reitalu","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Semi-natural grasslands (SNGs) are among Europe's most diverse ecosystems, supporting biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural heritage. Yet, around 90 % of their area has been lost in the past century due to intensification, urbanization, and abandonment, making effective management and restoration a conservation priority.</div><div>This study examines the perspectives of Estonian SNG managers within the context of existing practices and policies. Data were collected through 280 online questionnaires and 91 structured interviews. While farmers are generally motivated to continue management, driven by values such as tradition, biodiversity, and landscape aesthetics, they face multiple barriers. These include low cost-effectiveness, rigid regulations (e.g., fixed mowing dates), limited access to biodiversity advisory services, and challenges linked to administration and land rental.</div><div>Our findings highlight several shortcomings in current support schemes. Action-based subsidies often fail to reflect local ecological and socio-economic realities, reducing both efficiency and farmer engagement. To ensure long-term SNG viability, policies should become more flexible, cost-effective, and outcome-oriented. This includes adopting results-based payments, expanding advisory services, and strengthening collaboration between land managers, authorities, and conservation experts.</div><div>By centering on farmers' perspectives, this study provides insights into how policy design can better align ecological objectives with practical land management. Addressing the identified gaps could enhance the sustainability of SNG management in Estonia and offer lessons for similar landscapes across Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"313 ","pages":"Article 111520"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and solutions in managing semi-natural grasslands: Insights from Estonia\",\"authors\":\"Liis Kasari-Toussaint , Rufus Trepp , Krista Takkis , Aveliina Helm , Annely Holm , Bert Holm , Triin Reitalu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Semi-natural grasslands (SNGs) are among Europe's most diverse ecosystems, supporting biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural heritage. Yet, around 90 % of their area has been lost in the past century due to intensification, urbanization, and abandonment, making effective management and restoration a conservation priority.</div><div>This study examines the perspectives of Estonian SNG managers within the context of existing practices and policies. Data were collected through 280 online questionnaires and 91 structured interviews. While farmers are generally motivated to continue management, driven by values such as tradition, biodiversity, and landscape aesthetics, they face multiple barriers. These include low cost-effectiveness, rigid regulations (e.g., fixed mowing dates), limited access to biodiversity advisory services, and challenges linked to administration and land rental.</div><div>Our findings highlight several shortcomings in current support schemes. Action-based subsidies often fail to reflect local ecological and socio-economic realities, reducing both efficiency and farmer engagement. To ensure long-term SNG viability, policies should become more flexible, cost-effective, and outcome-oriented. This includes adopting results-based payments, expanding advisory services, and strengthening collaboration between land managers, authorities, and conservation experts.</div><div>By centering on farmers' perspectives, this study provides insights into how policy design can better align ecological objectives with practical land management. Addressing the identified gaps could enhance the sustainability of SNG management in Estonia and offer lessons for similar landscapes across Europe.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"313 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725005579\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725005579","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenges and solutions in managing semi-natural grasslands: Insights from Estonia
Semi-natural grasslands (SNGs) are among Europe's most diverse ecosystems, supporting biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural heritage. Yet, around 90 % of their area has been lost in the past century due to intensification, urbanization, and abandonment, making effective management and restoration a conservation priority.
This study examines the perspectives of Estonian SNG managers within the context of existing practices and policies. Data were collected through 280 online questionnaires and 91 structured interviews. While farmers are generally motivated to continue management, driven by values such as tradition, biodiversity, and landscape aesthetics, they face multiple barriers. These include low cost-effectiveness, rigid regulations (e.g., fixed mowing dates), limited access to biodiversity advisory services, and challenges linked to administration and land rental.
Our findings highlight several shortcomings in current support schemes. Action-based subsidies often fail to reflect local ecological and socio-economic realities, reducing both efficiency and farmer engagement. To ensure long-term SNG viability, policies should become more flexible, cost-effective, and outcome-oriented. This includes adopting results-based payments, expanding advisory services, and strengthening collaboration between land managers, authorities, and conservation experts.
By centering on farmers' perspectives, this study provides insights into how policy design can better align ecological objectives with practical land management. Addressing the identified gaps could enhance the sustainability of SNG management in Estonia and offer lessons for similar landscapes across Europe.
期刊介绍:
Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.