电动汽车用锂离子电池可持续性的最新研究进展

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Morgane Gillet , Hugo Helbling , Ali Sari
{"title":"电动汽车用锂离子电池可持续性的最新研究进展","authors":"Morgane Gillet ,&nbsp;Hugo Helbling ,&nbsp;Ali Sari","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.118631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The massive electrification of vehicles is a key point in the energy transition. This shift leads to various challenges, especially regarding lithium-ion batteries, as they can cause several environmental and socioeconomic impacts throughout their lifecycle. Therefore, it is essential to assess these effects in order to reduce them. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the literature regarding lithium-ion batteries sustainability (ecological, social and economic aspects) in the context of electric mobility. This paper highlights the growing number of published Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) addressing environmental impacts, while emphasizing the need for methodological harmonization at multiple levels, particularly in LCA tools and methods, as well as in the battery life cycle models considered. The lack of transparent and accessible data has been also highlighted. In the case of Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA), evaluating social impacts, a significant lack of studies and data have been noted. Moreover, this methodology requires further clarification and development. Life Cycle Costing (LCC), assessing economic impacts, rarely covers the entire life cycle of batteries, and its framework needs to be defined more clearly. Finally, sustainability studies, combining the three previous concepts, are rare, and the methodological frameworks and links between the three sustainability dimensions need to be clarified. This work explicitly identifies the obstacles and levers for accurately assessing the sustainability of lithium-ion batteries. In particular, recommendations are made on three major points. Firstly, the harmonization of assessment methodologies. Secondly, the need for interdisciplinary contributions to develop robust LCA models, illustrated by the example of the electrical engineering community, which can contribute to the integration of behavioural and aging models, usage scenarios, as well as account for the diversity of battery technologies. Thirdly, recommendations are made to support the development of more robust data and models, through open-science or the development of a secure data-sharing framework. Finally, all the data extracted from our study are open access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 118631"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State of the art on the sustainability of lithium-ion batteries for electric mobility\",\"authors\":\"Morgane Gillet ,&nbsp;Hugo Helbling ,&nbsp;Ali Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.est.2025.118631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The massive electrification of vehicles is a key point in the energy transition. This shift leads to various challenges, especially regarding lithium-ion batteries, as they can cause several environmental and socioeconomic impacts throughout their lifecycle. Therefore, it is essential to assess these effects in order to reduce them. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the literature regarding lithium-ion batteries sustainability (ecological, social and economic aspects) in the context of electric mobility. This paper highlights the growing number of published Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) addressing environmental impacts, while emphasizing the need for methodological harmonization at multiple levels, particularly in LCA tools and methods, as well as in the battery life cycle models considered. The lack of transparent and accessible data has been also highlighted. In the case of Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA), evaluating social impacts, a significant lack of studies and data have been noted. Moreover, this methodology requires further clarification and development. Life Cycle Costing (LCC), assessing economic impacts, rarely covers the entire life cycle of batteries, and its framework needs to be defined more clearly. Finally, sustainability studies, combining the three previous concepts, are rare, and the methodological frameworks and links between the three sustainability dimensions need to be clarified. This work explicitly identifies the obstacles and levers for accurately assessing the sustainability of lithium-ion batteries. In particular, recommendations are made on three major points. Firstly, the harmonization of assessment methodologies. Secondly, the need for interdisciplinary contributions to develop robust LCA models, illustrated by the example of the electrical engineering community, which can contribute to the integration of behavioural and aging models, usage scenarios, as well as account for the diversity of battery technologies. Thirdly, recommendations are made to support the development of more robust data and models, through open-science or the development of a secure data-sharing framework. Finally, all the data extracted from our study are open access.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25033444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25033444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汽车的大规模电气化是能源转型的一个关键点。这种转变带来了各种挑战,尤其是锂离子电池,因为它们在整个生命周期中会对环境和社会经济造成影响。因此,有必要评估这些影响,以减少它们。本文对电动汽车背景下锂离子电池可持续性(生态、社会和经济方面)的文献进行了全面研究。本文强调了越来越多的针对环境影响的生命周期评估(LCA),同时强调了在多个层面上进行方法协调的必要性,特别是在LCA工具和方法以及所考虑的电池生命周期模型中。还强调了缺乏透明和可获取的数据。就社会生命周期评估(SLCA)而言,评估社会影响的研究和数据严重缺乏。此外,这种方法需要进一步澄清和发展。生命周期成本(LCC)评估经济影响,很少涵盖电池的整个生命周期,其框架需要更明确的定义。最后,结合前面三个概念的可持续性研究很少,需要澄清可持续性三个维度之间的方法框架和联系。这项工作明确地确定了准确评估锂离子电池可持续性的障碍和杠杆。特别提出了三点建议。第一,评估方法的统一。其次,需要跨学科的贡献来开发强大的LCA模型,以电气工程社区为例,这可以有助于行为和老化模型的集成,使用场景,以及解释电池技术的多样性。第三,通过开放科学或开发安全的数据共享框架,提出了支持开发更健壮的数据和模型的建议。最后,从我们的研究中提取的所有数据都是开放获取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State of the art on the sustainability of lithium-ion batteries for electric mobility
The massive electrification of vehicles is a key point in the energy transition. This shift leads to various challenges, especially regarding lithium-ion batteries, as they can cause several environmental and socioeconomic impacts throughout their lifecycle. Therefore, it is essential to assess these effects in order to reduce them. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the literature regarding lithium-ion batteries sustainability (ecological, social and economic aspects) in the context of electric mobility. This paper highlights the growing number of published Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) addressing environmental impacts, while emphasizing the need for methodological harmonization at multiple levels, particularly in LCA tools and methods, as well as in the battery life cycle models considered. The lack of transparent and accessible data has been also highlighted. In the case of Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA), evaluating social impacts, a significant lack of studies and data have been noted. Moreover, this methodology requires further clarification and development. Life Cycle Costing (LCC), assessing economic impacts, rarely covers the entire life cycle of batteries, and its framework needs to be defined more clearly. Finally, sustainability studies, combining the three previous concepts, are rare, and the methodological frameworks and links between the three sustainability dimensions need to be clarified. This work explicitly identifies the obstacles and levers for accurately assessing the sustainability of lithium-ion batteries. In particular, recommendations are made on three major points. Firstly, the harmonization of assessment methodologies. Secondly, the need for interdisciplinary contributions to develop robust LCA models, illustrated by the example of the electrical engineering community, which can contribute to the integration of behavioural and aging models, usage scenarios, as well as account for the diversity of battery technologies. Thirdly, recommendations are made to support the development of more robust data and models, through open-science or the development of a secure data-sharing framework. Finally, all the data extracted from our study are open access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信