{"title":"碳税不确定性下企业绿色技术投资与生产策略的异质性调整弹性","authors":"Tongyuan Shen , Manyi Wang , Yujie Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines how uncertainty in carbon tax policy implementation interacts with firms’ flexibility in adjusting green technology investments to shape market equilibrium, social welfare, and environmental outcomes. We develop a Cournot duopoly model in which two profit-maximizing firms compete in quantities, invest in emission-reducing technologies, and face a carbon tax that may or may not be enacted with known probability. We compare two cases — flexible and inflexible investment adjustment — depending on whether firms determine their investment decisions after or before the policy realization. We identify two central mechanisms: the investment enhancement effect and the production expansion effect. Together, these effects lead to lower expected profits but higher expected consumer surplus in the flexible investment adjustment case. Furthermore, we show that the comparison of expected tax revenue and social welfare across the two cases depends critically on the carbon tax rate. Our findings provide theoretical insights into how the interaction between policy uncertainty and operational flexibility shapes strategic firm behavior and determines the effectiveness of carbon tax policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 138300"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firms’ green technology investment and production strategies under carbon tax uncertainty with heterogeneous adjustment flexibility\",\"authors\":\"Tongyuan Shen , Manyi Wang , Yujie Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines how uncertainty in carbon tax policy implementation interacts with firms’ flexibility in adjusting green technology investments to shape market equilibrium, social welfare, and environmental outcomes. We develop a Cournot duopoly model in which two profit-maximizing firms compete in quantities, invest in emission-reducing technologies, and face a carbon tax that may or may not be enacted with known probability. We compare two cases — flexible and inflexible investment adjustment — depending on whether firms determine their investment decisions after or before the policy realization. We identify two central mechanisms: the investment enhancement effect and the production expansion effect. Together, these effects lead to lower expected profits but higher expected consumer surplus in the flexible investment adjustment case. Furthermore, we show that the comparison of expected tax revenue and social welfare across the two cases depends critically on the carbon tax rate. Our findings provide theoretical insights into how the interaction between policy uncertainty and operational flexibility shapes strategic firm behavior and determines the effectiveness of carbon tax policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy\",\"volume\":\"338 \",\"pages\":\"Article 138300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225039428\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225039428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Firms’ green technology investment and production strategies under carbon tax uncertainty with heterogeneous adjustment flexibility
This paper examines how uncertainty in carbon tax policy implementation interacts with firms’ flexibility in adjusting green technology investments to shape market equilibrium, social welfare, and environmental outcomes. We develop a Cournot duopoly model in which two profit-maximizing firms compete in quantities, invest in emission-reducing technologies, and face a carbon tax that may or may not be enacted with known probability. We compare two cases — flexible and inflexible investment adjustment — depending on whether firms determine their investment decisions after or before the policy realization. We identify two central mechanisms: the investment enhancement effect and the production expansion effect. Together, these effects lead to lower expected profits but higher expected consumer surplus in the flexible investment adjustment case. Furthermore, we show that the comparison of expected tax revenue and social welfare across the two cases depends critically on the carbon tax rate. Our findings provide theoretical insights into how the interaction between policy uncertainty and operational flexibility shapes strategic firm behavior and determines the effectiveness of carbon tax policies.
期刊介绍:
Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics.
The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management.
Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.