DSM-5创伤后应激障碍日常问卷的心理测量评估:项目反应理论和纵向测量不变性分析

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Brett A. Messman , Siyuan Wang , Prathiba Batley , Nicole H. Weiss , Jennifer A. Newberry , Ateka A. Contractor
{"title":"DSM-5创伤后应激障碍日常问卷的心理测量评估:项目反应理论和纵向测量不变性分析","authors":"Brett A. Messman ,&nbsp;Siyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Prathiba Batley ,&nbsp;Nicole H. Weiss ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Newberry ,&nbsp;Ateka A. Contractor","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) has demonstrated excellent psychometric qualities across cross-sectional studies, yet the scale’s performance in intensive longitudinal studies is less known. Using data from the PCL-5 administered daily for 9 days, we (a) conducted item analysis of the PCL-5 using the graded response model to examine item characteristics (thresholds and discrimination parameters) and (b) examined differential item functioning (DIF) to evaluate whether the PCL-5 measured the PTSD latent trait identically across daily surveys (i.e., longitudinal measurement invariance). Methodologically, 256 trauma-exposed university students (<em>M</em>age = 21.01 ± 4.24; 85.8 % women; 41.0 % probable PTSD) completed the 20-item PCL-5 for 9 consecutive days. Across days, results indicated lower but acceptable discrimination for PCL-5 items 8 (traumatic amnesia), 16 (reckless or self-destructive behaviors), and 17 (hypervigilance). Further, 14 % of participants exhibited person misfit at least once across the 9 days. DIF analysis indicated that Item 2 (nightmares) exhibited DIF across days indicating potential bias; however, the effect sizes for DIF were negligible. In conclusion, the results broadly provide psychometric support for using the 20-item PCL-5 in intensive longitudinal studies. Future replication of study results across diverse and clinical populations could help to further strengthen these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103079"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 in daily surveys: An item response theory and longitudinal measurement invariance analysis\",\"authors\":\"Brett A. Messman ,&nbsp;Siyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Prathiba Batley ,&nbsp;Nicole H. Weiss ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Newberry ,&nbsp;Ateka A. Contractor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) has demonstrated excellent psychometric qualities across cross-sectional studies, yet the scale’s performance in intensive longitudinal studies is less known. Using data from the PCL-5 administered daily for 9 days, we (a) conducted item analysis of the PCL-5 using the graded response model to examine item characteristics (thresholds and discrimination parameters) and (b) examined differential item functioning (DIF) to evaluate whether the PCL-5 measured the PTSD latent trait identically across daily surveys (i.e., longitudinal measurement invariance). Methodologically, 256 trauma-exposed university students (<em>M</em>age = 21.01 ± 4.24; 85.8 % women; 41.0 % probable PTSD) completed the 20-item PCL-5 for 9 consecutive days. Across days, results indicated lower but acceptable discrimination for PCL-5 items 8 (traumatic amnesia), 16 (reckless or self-destructive behaviors), and 17 (hypervigilance). Further, 14 % of participants exhibited person misfit at least once across the 9 days. DIF analysis indicated that Item 2 (nightmares) exhibited DIF across days indicating potential bias; however, the effect sizes for DIF were negligible. In conclusion, the results broadly provide psychometric support for using the 20-item PCL-5 in intensive longitudinal studies. Future replication of study results across diverse and clinical populations could help to further strengthen these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088761852500115X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088761852500115X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

DSM-5 (PCL-5)中的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表在横断面研究中显示了出色的心理测量质量,但在密集的纵向研究中,该量表的表现却鲜为人知。使用连续9天每天给药的PCL-5的数据,我们(a)使用分级反应模型对PCL-5进行项目分析,以检查项目特征(阈值和区分参数);(b)检查差异项目功能(DIF),以评估PCL-5在每天的调查中是否测量了相同的PTSD潜在特征(即纵向测量不变性)。方法:256名创伤暴露大学生(Mage = 21.01 ± 4.24;女性85.8% %;41.0% %可能有PTSD)连续9天完成20项PCL-5。结果显示,PCL-5项目8(创伤性遗忘)、16(鲁莽或自毁行为)和17(过度警惕)的歧视程度较低,但可以接受。此外,14 %的参与者在9天内至少有一次表现出不适应。DIF分析表明,项目2(噩梦)在几天内表现出DIF,表明潜在的偏见;然而,DIF的效应量可以忽略不计。综上所述,本研究结果为在密集的纵向研究中使用20项PCL-5提供了广泛的心理测量学支持。未来在不同的临床人群中重复研究结果可能有助于进一步加强这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric evaluation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 in daily surveys: An item response theory and longitudinal measurement invariance analysis
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) has demonstrated excellent psychometric qualities across cross-sectional studies, yet the scale’s performance in intensive longitudinal studies is less known. Using data from the PCL-5 administered daily for 9 days, we (a) conducted item analysis of the PCL-5 using the graded response model to examine item characteristics (thresholds and discrimination parameters) and (b) examined differential item functioning (DIF) to evaluate whether the PCL-5 measured the PTSD latent trait identically across daily surveys (i.e., longitudinal measurement invariance). Methodologically, 256 trauma-exposed university students (Mage = 21.01 ± 4.24; 85.8 % women; 41.0 % probable PTSD) completed the 20-item PCL-5 for 9 consecutive days. Across days, results indicated lower but acceptable discrimination for PCL-5 items 8 (traumatic amnesia), 16 (reckless or self-destructive behaviors), and 17 (hypervigilance). Further, 14 % of participants exhibited person misfit at least once across the 9 days. DIF analysis indicated that Item 2 (nightmares) exhibited DIF across days indicating potential bias; however, the effect sizes for DIF were negligible. In conclusion, the results broadly provide psychometric support for using the 20-item PCL-5 in intensive longitudinal studies. Future replication of study results across diverse and clinical populations could help to further strengthen these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信