中国上市公司可持续发展中的公司绩效评价:基于网络DEA和BoD模型的串并联结构

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ruchuan Zhang , Aijun Li , Xuenan Wu , Yao Wang
{"title":"中国上市公司可持续发展中的公司绩效评价:基于网络DEA和BoD模型的串并联结构","authors":"Ruchuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Aijun Li ,&nbsp;Xuenan Wu ,&nbsp;Yao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sustainable finance's selective backing and the capital market's increasing attention on corporate sustainability highlight that evaluating listed companies' green performance is of crucial importance for investors. However, few studies have considered the aggregated performance of innovative, operational and environmental sub-systems. This study constructs a sustainability system of a series-parallel structure, and proposes a new methodological framework with several charming methodological advantages. Empirically, this study evaluates aggregated efficiency and technology inequality across China's 1065 listed companies from 2011 to 2021. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, the average efficiency of innovative sub-system (0.730) is lower than that of operational and environmental sub-systems, suggesting that listed companies still have much potential to enhance innovation capabilities. Second, according to results of direct and indirect network performance indexes, intermediate products are identified as important focus points for improving sustainability performance. Finally, the efficiency Gini coefficient reveals a widening gap in technical inequality among sample companies in the sustainability assessment system, with the growing disparity between the two sub-sample groups acting as a primary factor. This study provides policymakers with a robust approach for tracking sources of inefficiency, and then propose proactive strategies to enhance company sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 138681"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the corporate performance in sustainable development of China's listed companies: a new series-parallel structure based on network DEA and BoD models\",\"authors\":\"Ruchuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Aijun Li ,&nbsp;Xuenan Wu ,&nbsp;Yao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The sustainable finance's selective backing and the capital market's increasing attention on corporate sustainability highlight that evaluating listed companies' green performance is of crucial importance for investors. However, few studies have considered the aggregated performance of innovative, operational and environmental sub-systems. This study constructs a sustainability system of a series-parallel structure, and proposes a new methodological framework with several charming methodological advantages. Empirically, this study evaluates aggregated efficiency and technology inequality across China's 1065 listed companies from 2011 to 2021. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, the average efficiency of innovative sub-system (0.730) is lower than that of operational and environmental sub-systems, suggesting that listed companies still have much potential to enhance innovation capabilities. Second, according to results of direct and indirect network performance indexes, intermediate products are identified as important focus points for improving sustainability performance. Finally, the efficiency Gini coefficient reveals a widening gap in technical inequality among sample companies in the sustainability assessment system, with the growing disparity between the two sub-sample groups acting as a primary factor. This study provides policymakers with a robust approach for tracking sources of inefficiency, and then propose proactive strategies to enhance company sustainability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy\",\"volume\":\"338 \",\"pages\":\"Article 138681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225043233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225043233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续金融的选择性支持和资本市场对企业可持续发展的日益关注,凸显了对上市公司绿色绩效的评价对投资者至关重要。然而,很少有研究考虑创新、业务和环境子系统的综合绩效。本研究构建了一个串并联结构的可持续性系统,并提出了一个新的方法论框架,该框架具有几个迷人的方法论优势。实证研究评估了2011 - 2021年中国1065家上市公司的总效率和技术不平等。主要研究结果总结如下:首先,上市公司创新子系统的平均效率(0.730)低于运营子系统和环境子系统,说明上市公司的创新能力仍有很大提升空间。其次,根据直接和间接网络绩效指标的结果,确定中间产品是提高可持续绩效的重要重点。最后,效率基尼系数揭示了样本公司在可持续发展评价体系中的技术不平等差距不断扩大,两个子样本组之间的差距越来越大是主要因素。本研究为政策制定者提供了一种有效的方法来追踪低效率的来源,然后提出积极的策略来提高公司的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the corporate performance in sustainable development of China's listed companies: a new series-parallel structure based on network DEA and BoD models
The sustainable finance's selective backing and the capital market's increasing attention on corporate sustainability highlight that evaluating listed companies' green performance is of crucial importance for investors. However, few studies have considered the aggregated performance of innovative, operational and environmental sub-systems. This study constructs a sustainability system of a series-parallel structure, and proposes a new methodological framework with several charming methodological advantages. Empirically, this study evaluates aggregated efficiency and technology inequality across China's 1065 listed companies from 2011 to 2021. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, the average efficiency of innovative sub-system (0.730) is lower than that of operational and environmental sub-systems, suggesting that listed companies still have much potential to enhance innovation capabilities. Second, according to results of direct and indirect network performance indexes, intermediate products are identified as important focus points for improving sustainability performance. Finally, the efficiency Gini coefficient reveals a widening gap in technical inequality among sample companies in the sustainability assessment system, with the growing disparity between the two sub-sample groups acting as a primary factor. This study provides policymakers with a robust approach for tracking sources of inefficiency, and then propose proactive strategies to enhance company sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信