科学的海洋钻探让我们了解了海洋沉积物的渗透性

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hugh Daigle , Eli Cable , Carlos Figueroa-Diaz , Jordan Jee , Aidan Pyrcz
{"title":"科学的海洋钻探让我们了解了海洋沉积物的渗透性","authors":"Hugh Daigle ,&nbsp;Eli Cable ,&nbsp;Carlos Figueroa-Diaz ,&nbsp;Jordan Jee ,&nbsp;Aidan Pyrcz","doi":"10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2025.107632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scientific ocean drilling has provided a significant amount of information about the marine subsurface over the last 57 years, including samples and data pertaining to physical properties, geochemistry, microbiology, lithology, stratigraphy, and structural geology. Our understanding of subsurface mass transport has benefited from many hundreds of permeability measurements performed on scientific ocean drilling samples. We assembled a database of 836 permeability measurements along with other physical properties measured shipboard, including determinations of porosity and grain density from moisture and density (MAD) measurements, natural gamma radiation and magnetic susceptibility from multisensory core logger (MSCL) measurements, total carbonate content, and lithological description, silt percentage, and clay percentage from smear slides. The goals of our study were assessing the state of our understanding of marine sediment permeability, assessing processes that control permeability, and the best ways to leverage legacy ocean drilling samples and datasets to improve our understanding of the subsurface. We found that the majority of permeability samples (71 %) come from the Pacific Ocean, particularly its active margins; that clays and silts are the most frequently tested lithologies; that the depth distribution of samples is similar to the overall depth distribution of drilled holes, indicating that the data are not biased towards particular depth ranges; and that the permeabilities obtained span nearly 11 orders of magnitude. We observed weak to no correlation between permeability and the physical properties we considered, but we were able to train a random forest regression model to predict permeability within about half an order of magnitude based on measurements that were performed previously or can be obtained from unpreserved, legacy cores. This presents an opportunity to be able to predict permeability in more locations globally and answer research questions about fluid flow and pore pressure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18189,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107632"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What scientific ocean drilling has taught us about the permeability of marine sediments\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Daigle ,&nbsp;Eli Cable ,&nbsp;Carlos Figueroa-Diaz ,&nbsp;Jordan Jee ,&nbsp;Aidan Pyrcz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2025.107632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Scientific ocean drilling has provided a significant amount of information about the marine subsurface over the last 57 years, including samples and data pertaining to physical properties, geochemistry, microbiology, lithology, stratigraphy, and structural geology. Our understanding of subsurface mass transport has benefited from many hundreds of permeability measurements performed on scientific ocean drilling samples. We assembled a database of 836 permeability measurements along with other physical properties measured shipboard, including determinations of porosity and grain density from moisture and density (MAD) measurements, natural gamma radiation and magnetic susceptibility from multisensory core logger (MSCL) measurements, total carbonate content, and lithological description, silt percentage, and clay percentage from smear slides. The goals of our study were assessing the state of our understanding of marine sediment permeability, assessing processes that control permeability, and the best ways to leverage legacy ocean drilling samples and datasets to improve our understanding of the subsurface. We found that the majority of permeability samples (71 %) come from the Pacific Ocean, particularly its active margins; that clays and silts are the most frequently tested lithologies; that the depth distribution of samples is similar to the overall depth distribution of drilled holes, indicating that the data are not biased towards particular depth ranges; and that the permeabilities obtained span nearly 11 orders of magnitude. We observed weak to no correlation between permeability and the physical properties we considered, but we were able to train a random forest regression model to predict permeability within about half an order of magnitude based on measurements that were performed previously or can be obtained from unpreserved, legacy cores. This presents an opportunity to be able to predict permeability in more locations globally and answer research questions about fluid flow and pore pressure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine and Petroleum Geology\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine and Petroleum Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817225003496\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817225003496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的57年里,科学海洋钻探提供了大量关于海洋地下的信息,包括与物理性质、地球化学、微生物学、岩性、地层学和构造地质学有关的样本和数据。我们对地下物质运输的理解得益于对科学海洋钻探样品进行的数百次渗透率测量。我们收集了836个渗透率测量数据,以及船上测量的其他物理性质数据,包括通过水分和密度(MAD)测量的孔隙度和颗粒密度,通过多传感器岩心记录仪(MSCL)测量的自然伽马辐射和磁化率,通过涂片测量的总碳酸盐含量、岩性描述、淤泥百分比和粘土百分比。我们的研究目标是评估我们对海洋沉积物渗透性的理解状态,评估控制渗透性的过程,以及利用传统海洋钻探样本和数据集来提高我们对地下的理解的最佳方法。我们发现大多数渗透率样品(71%)来自太平洋,特别是其活动边缘;粘土和粉砂是最常测试的岩性;样品的深度分布与钻孔的整体深度分布相似,表明数据不偏向于特定的深度范围;得到的渗透率跨度近11个数量级。我们观察到渗透率与我们所考虑的物理性质之间的相关性很弱,甚至没有相关性,但我们能够训练随机森林回归模型,根据之前进行的测量或从未保存的遗留岩心中获得的数据,在大约半个数量级内预测渗透率。这为预测全球更多地区的渗透率提供了机会,并回答了有关流体流动和孔隙压力的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What scientific ocean drilling has taught us about the permeability of marine sediments
Scientific ocean drilling has provided a significant amount of information about the marine subsurface over the last 57 years, including samples and data pertaining to physical properties, geochemistry, microbiology, lithology, stratigraphy, and structural geology. Our understanding of subsurface mass transport has benefited from many hundreds of permeability measurements performed on scientific ocean drilling samples. We assembled a database of 836 permeability measurements along with other physical properties measured shipboard, including determinations of porosity and grain density from moisture and density (MAD) measurements, natural gamma radiation and magnetic susceptibility from multisensory core logger (MSCL) measurements, total carbonate content, and lithological description, silt percentage, and clay percentage from smear slides. The goals of our study were assessing the state of our understanding of marine sediment permeability, assessing processes that control permeability, and the best ways to leverage legacy ocean drilling samples and datasets to improve our understanding of the subsurface. We found that the majority of permeability samples (71 %) come from the Pacific Ocean, particularly its active margins; that clays and silts are the most frequently tested lithologies; that the depth distribution of samples is similar to the overall depth distribution of drilled holes, indicating that the data are not biased towards particular depth ranges; and that the permeabilities obtained span nearly 11 orders of magnitude. We observed weak to no correlation between permeability and the physical properties we considered, but we were able to train a random forest regression model to predict permeability within about half an order of magnitude based on measurements that were performed previously or can be obtained from unpreserved, legacy cores. This presents an opportunity to be able to predict permeability in more locations globally and answer research questions about fluid flow and pore pressure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine and Petroleum Geology
Marine and Petroleum Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
475
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Marine and Petroleum Geology is the pre-eminent international forum for the exchange of multidisciplinary concepts, interpretations and techniques for all concerned with marine and petroleum geology in industry, government and academia. Rapid bimonthly publication allows early communications of papers or short communications to the geoscience community. Marine and Petroleum Geology is essential reading for geologists, geophysicists and explorationists in industry, government and academia working in the following areas: marine geology; basin analysis and evaluation; organic geochemistry; reserve/resource estimation; seismic stratigraphy; thermal models of basic evolution; sedimentary geology; continental margins; geophysical interpretation; structural geology/tectonics; formation evaluation techniques; well logging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信