相对可及性增益:多职业隔离与工作可及性差异之间的局部联系

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Yao Shen
{"title":"相对可及性增益:多职业隔离与工作可及性差异之间的局部联系","authors":"Yao Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential segregation by occupation reflects complex spatial dynamics, strongly conditioned by inequalities in job accessibility. While accessibility differentials shape residential choices and contribute to socio-spatial division, identifying robust spatial and statistical associations has proved challenging. This study introduces Relative Accessibility Gain (RAG), a measure capturing the gap between disaggregated accessibility—by transport mode and occupational group—and aggregate averages. RAG reveals how accessibility benefits are unevenly distributed, with higher-status groups systematically advantaged. Using commuting data from the 2011 Census, the analysis applies RAG to the London Metropolitan Area (LMA) and demonstrates its superiority over conventional accessibility indicators in explaining local patterns of multi-occupational segregation. The findings indicate that positive RAG values are strongly associated with reduced residential randomness and heightened segregation, particularly where advantaged groups capture accessibility gains. Public transport exerts a greater structuring effect than private transport, reducing randomness across multiple groups but also intensifying segregation in well-connected areas. By highlighting the localised role of accessibility inequalities, this study offers a novel methodological framework for diagnosing accessibility-driven segregation and informing socially inclusive transport planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106538"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative accessibility gain: Local linkages between multi-occupational segregation and job accessibility differentials\",\"authors\":\"Yao Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Residential segregation by occupation reflects complex spatial dynamics, strongly conditioned by inequalities in job accessibility. While accessibility differentials shape residential choices and contribute to socio-spatial division, identifying robust spatial and statistical associations has proved challenging. This study introduces Relative Accessibility Gain (RAG), a measure capturing the gap between disaggregated accessibility—by transport mode and occupational group—and aggregate averages. RAG reveals how accessibility benefits are unevenly distributed, with higher-status groups systematically advantaged. Using commuting data from the 2011 Census, the analysis applies RAG to the London Metropolitan Area (LMA) and demonstrates its superiority over conventional accessibility indicators in explaining local patterns of multi-occupational segregation. The findings indicate that positive RAG values are strongly associated with reduced residential randomness and heightened segregation, particularly where advantaged groups capture accessibility gains. Public transport exerts a greater structuring effect than private transport, reducing randomness across multiple groups but also intensifying segregation in well-connected areas. By highlighting the localised role of accessibility inequalities, this study offers a novel methodological framework for diagnosing accessibility-driven segregation and informing socially inclusive transport planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125008418\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125008418","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

按职业划分的居住隔离反映了复杂的空间动态,受到工作可及性不平等的强烈制约。虽然可达性差异影响了居住选择,并导致了社会空间划分,但确定强大的空间和统计关联已被证明具有挑战性。本研究引入了相对可达性增益(RAG),这是一个衡量按交通方式和职业群体分类的可达性与总平均值之间差距的指标。RAG揭示了无障碍利益是如何不均匀分布的,地位较高的群体在系统上具有优势。利用2011年人口普查的通勤数据,该分析将RAG应用于伦敦大都会区(LMA),并证明其在解释多职业隔离的地方模式方面优于传统的可达性指标。研究结果表明,积极的RAG值与减少居住随机性和加剧隔离密切相关,特别是在优势群体获得可达性收益的情况下。公共交通比私人交通具有更大的结构效应,减少了多个群体之间的随机性,但也加剧了交通发达地区的隔离。通过强调可达性不平等的局部作用,本研究提供了一种新的方法框架,用于诊断可达性驱动的隔离,并为社会包容性交通规划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative accessibility gain: Local linkages between multi-occupational segregation and job accessibility differentials
Residential segregation by occupation reflects complex spatial dynamics, strongly conditioned by inequalities in job accessibility. While accessibility differentials shape residential choices and contribute to socio-spatial division, identifying robust spatial and statistical associations has proved challenging. This study introduces Relative Accessibility Gain (RAG), a measure capturing the gap between disaggregated accessibility—by transport mode and occupational group—and aggregate averages. RAG reveals how accessibility benefits are unevenly distributed, with higher-status groups systematically advantaged. Using commuting data from the 2011 Census, the analysis applies RAG to the London Metropolitan Area (LMA) and demonstrates its superiority over conventional accessibility indicators in explaining local patterns of multi-occupational segregation. The findings indicate that positive RAG values are strongly associated with reduced residential randomness and heightened segregation, particularly where advantaged groups capture accessibility gains. Public transport exerts a greater structuring effect than private transport, reducing randomness across multiple groups but also intensifying segregation in well-connected areas. By highlighting the localised role of accessibility inequalities, this study offers a novel methodological framework for diagnosing accessibility-driven segregation and informing socially inclusive transport planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信