Rong Hu , Shuai Yue , Changmin Jiang , Shiyuan Zheng
{"title":"弥合绿色鸿沟:机场采用可持续航空燃料的最佳机场补贴机制","authors":"Rong Hu , Shuai Yue , Changmin Jiang , Shiyuan Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) has emerged as a critical lever for decarbonizing air transport, yet its high production cost keeps uptake stubbornly low. Airports, which can bridge the price gap through targeted subsidies, have piloted both per-unit fixed payments and cost differential schemes to support SAF adoption. This paper develops a unified two-stage sequential-game model, incorporating emission constraints, stochastic SAF costs, and oligopolistic airline competition to compare these mechanisms. We evaluate the performance of each subsidy strategy in promoting SAF adoption, airport profit, airline profit, subsidy burdens, and social welfare. Fixed payments provide stability and drive uptake in nascent, volatile, or highly competitive markets. Cost differential support, by aligning subsidies with actual cost spreads and sharing risk, maximizes welfare in mature, stable, high-demand environments. Building on these insights, policymakers can start with per-unit fixed subsidies to catalyze initial adoption, then transition to cost differential schemes, backed by a transparent and data-driven monitoring system that aligns subsidy parameters with the evolving market to ensure optimal decarbonization outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 104699"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the green divide: Optimal airport subsidy mechanisms for sustainable aviation fuel adoption in airports\",\"authors\":\"Rong Hu , Shuai Yue , Changmin Jiang , Shiyuan Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) has emerged as a critical lever for decarbonizing air transport, yet its high production cost keeps uptake stubbornly low. Airports, which can bridge the price gap through targeted subsidies, have piloted both per-unit fixed payments and cost differential schemes to support SAF adoption. This paper develops a unified two-stage sequential-game model, incorporating emission constraints, stochastic SAF costs, and oligopolistic airline competition to compare these mechanisms. We evaluate the performance of each subsidy strategy in promoting SAF adoption, airport profit, airline profit, subsidy burdens, and social welfare. Fixed payments provide stability and drive uptake in nascent, volatile, or highly competitive markets. Cost differential support, by aligning subsidies with actual cost spreads and sharing risk, maximizes welfare in mature, stable, high-demand environments. Building on these insights, policymakers can start with per-unit fixed subsidies to catalyze initial adoption, then transition to cost differential schemes, backed by a transparent and data-driven monitoring system that aligns subsidy parameters with the evolving market to ensure optimal decarbonization outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003325\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bridging the green divide: Optimal airport subsidy mechanisms for sustainable aviation fuel adoption in airports
Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) has emerged as a critical lever for decarbonizing air transport, yet its high production cost keeps uptake stubbornly low. Airports, which can bridge the price gap through targeted subsidies, have piloted both per-unit fixed payments and cost differential schemes to support SAF adoption. This paper develops a unified two-stage sequential-game model, incorporating emission constraints, stochastic SAF costs, and oligopolistic airline competition to compare these mechanisms. We evaluate the performance of each subsidy strategy in promoting SAF adoption, airport profit, airline profit, subsidy burdens, and social welfare. Fixed payments provide stability and drive uptake in nascent, volatile, or highly competitive markets. Cost differential support, by aligning subsidies with actual cost spreads and sharing risk, maximizes welfare in mature, stable, high-demand environments. Building on these insights, policymakers can start with per-unit fixed subsidies to catalyze initial adoption, then transition to cost differential schemes, backed by a transparent and data-driven monitoring system that aligns subsidy parameters with the evolving market to ensure optimal decarbonization outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.