{"title":"未来城市的公共空间:基于地点解决方案的城市弹性维度映射","authors":"Mehmet Ronael, Gülden Demet Oruç Ertekin","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As cities confront mounting challenges, rethinking public space as a critical infrastructure for urban resilience has become urgent. This study examines to what extent place-based solutions, developed in response to future-oriented visions and urban challenges, contribute to the resilience of public space across multiple dimensions. Grounded in a twelve-dimensional urban resilience framework, the research draws upon an analysis of academic studies and integrates expert evaluations to assess the strategic value of proposed interventions. The study follows a multi-step process, beginning with the identification of key challenges and conceptual visions, and proceeding to the evaluation of place-based solutions in terms of their alignment with resilience dimensions. It focuses on three thematic orientations in which public space is envisioned as a hub for well-being, a platform for inclusivity, and an instrument for climate adaptation. Findings reveal an imbalance across resilience dimensions. Diversity, Inclusion, Adaptability, and Flexibility are consistently emphasized, particularly in well-being and equity-related interventions, while Redundancy, Independence, and Resources are underrepresented, revealing gaps in operational resilience and long-term planning. Expert rankings also suggest that climate-oriented strategies are undervalued despite their relevance amid environmental disruption. These results highlight the dominance of socially grounded and human-centered approaches in current visions of future public space, while underscoring the need to strengthen systemic and infrastructural capacities. By combining thematic synthesis with expert validation, the study presents a framework for evaluating the resilience potential of place-based interventions and outlines avenues for future interdisciplinary research and policy innovation toward sustainable and resilient urban futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 106870"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public spaces for future cities: Mapping urban resilience dimensions in place-based solutions\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Ronael, Gülden Demet Oruç Ertekin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As cities confront mounting challenges, rethinking public space as a critical infrastructure for urban resilience has become urgent. This study examines to what extent place-based solutions, developed in response to future-oriented visions and urban challenges, contribute to the resilience of public space across multiple dimensions. Grounded in a twelve-dimensional urban resilience framework, the research draws upon an analysis of academic studies and integrates expert evaluations to assess the strategic value of proposed interventions. The study follows a multi-step process, beginning with the identification of key challenges and conceptual visions, and proceeding to the evaluation of place-based solutions in terms of their alignment with resilience dimensions. It focuses on three thematic orientations in which public space is envisioned as a hub for well-being, a platform for inclusivity, and an instrument for climate adaptation. Findings reveal an imbalance across resilience dimensions. Diversity, Inclusion, Adaptability, and Flexibility are consistently emphasized, particularly in well-being and equity-related interventions, while Redundancy, Independence, and Resources are underrepresented, revealing gaps in operational resilience and long-term planning. Expert rankings also suggest that climate-oriented strategies are undervalued despite their relevance amid environmental disruption. These results highlight the dominance of socially grounded and human-centered approaches in current visions of future public space, while underscoring the need to strengthen systemic and infrastructural capacities. By combining thematic synthesis with expert validation, the study presents a framework for evaluating the resilience potential of place-based interventions and outlines avenues for future interdisciplinary research and policy innovation toward sustainable and resilient urban futures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725007437\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725007437","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public spaces for future cities: Mapping urban resilience dimensions in place-based solutions
As cities confront mounting challenges, rethinking public space as a critical infrastructure for urban resilience has become urgent. This study examines to what extent place-based solutions, developed in response to future-oriented visions and urban challenges, contribute to the resilience of public space across multiple dimensions. Grounded in a twelve-dimensional urban resilience framework, the research draws upon an analysis of academic studies and integrates expert evaluations to assess the strategic value of proposed interventions. The study follows a multi-step process, beginning with the identification of key challenges and conceptual visions, and proceeding to the evaluation of place-based solutions in terms of their alignment with resilience dimensions. It focuses on three thematic orientations in which public space is envisioned as a hub for well-being, a platform for inclusivity, and an instrument for climate adaptation. Findings reveal an imbalance across resilience dimensions. Diversity, Inclusion, Adaptability, and Flexibility are consistently emphasized, particularly in well-being and equity-related interventions, while Redundancy, Independence, and Resources are underrepresented, revealing gaps in operational resilience and long-term planning. Expert rankings also suggest that climate-oriented strategies are undervalued despite their relevance amid environmental disruption. These results highlight the dominance of socially grounded and human-centered approaches in current visions of future public space, while underscoring the need to strengthen systemic and infrastructural capacities. By combining thematic synthesis with expert validation, the study presents a framework for evaluating the resilience potential of place-based interventions and outlines avenues for future interdisciplinary research and policy innovation toward sustainable and resilient urban futures.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including:
1. Smart cities and resilient environments;
2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management;
3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management);
4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities;
5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments;
6. Green infrastructure and BMPs;
7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management;
8. Urban agriculture and forestry;
9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure;
10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy;
11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities;
12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities;
13. Health monitoring and improvement;
14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies;
15. Smart city governance;
16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society;
17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies;
18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems.
19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management;
20. Waste reduction and recycling;
21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling;
22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;