能源转型对谁有利?欧盟复苏和复原力计划中的性别层面

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Cloe Mirenda , Marco Cellini , Lucio Pisacane , Serena Tagliacozzo , Maria Camilla Fraudatario
{"title":"能源转型对谁有利?欧盟复苏和复原力计划中的性别层面","authors":"Cloe Mirenda ,&nbsp;Marco Cellini ,&nbsp;Lucio Pisacane ,&nbsp;Serena Tagliacozzo ,&nbsp;Maria Camilla Fraudatario","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the European Union has made strong commitments to a just and inclusive energy transition, the gender-energy nexus remains insufficiently addressed within existing policy frameworks. This study applies the NRRPs Gender-Energy Nexus Assessment Framework to assess the extent to which gender considerations are integrated into the energy transition measures outlined in EU Member States' National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs). The analysis is structured around three key dimensions: Recognitional Energy Justice, Distributive Energy Justice, and Procedural Energy Justice. Findings indicate that the majority of NRRPs lack gender-specific measures, particularly in areas such as energy poverty alleviation, consumer support, and inclusive decision-making processes. While some plans include initiatives to enhance women's participation in STEM education and the energy workforce, the limited use of gender-disaggregated data significantly hampers the development of targeted policy responses. A few countries, including Spain, Austria, and Croatia, exhibit relatively stronger commitments to gender mainstreaming in their energy strategies. In contrast, others—such as Germany, France, and Poland—show minimal to no integration of gender considerations. These shortcomings appear to stem from structural barriers, including limited gender expertise in policy design, persistent sectoral gender segregation, and weak advocacy for gender-inclusive energy policies. The study highlights the urgent need for systematic collection and use of gender-disaggregated data, the strengthening of procedural justice mechanisms, and the allocation of dedicated funding to support gender-responsive approaches. Addressing these gaps is essential to achieving a truly inclusive and equitable energy transition across the EU.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104365"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy transition for whom? Gender dimensions in the European Union recovery and resilience plans\",\"authors\":\"Cloe Mirenda ,&nbsp;Marco Cellini ,&nbsp;Lucio Pisacane ,&nbsp;Serena Tagliacozzo ,&nbsp;Maria Camilla Fraudatario\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While the European Union has made strong commitments to a just and inclusive energy transition, the gender-energy nexus remains insufficiently addressed within existing policy frameworks. This study applies the NRRPs Gender-Energy Nexus Assessment Framework to assess the extent to which gender considerations are integrated into the energy transition measures outlined in EU Member States' National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs). The analysis is structured around three key dimensions: Recognitional Energy Justice, Distributive Energy Justice, and Procedural Energy Justice. Findings indicate that the majority of NRRPs lack gender-specific measures, particularly in areas such as energy poverty alleviation, consumer support, and inclusive decision-making processes. While some plans include initiatives to enhance women's participation in STEM education and the energy workforce, the limited use of gender-disaggregated data significantly hampers the development of targeted policy responses. A few countries, including Spain, Austria, and Croatia, exhibit relatively stronger commitments to gender mainstreaming in their energy strategies. In contrast, others—such as Germany, France, and Poland—show minimal to no integration of gender considerations. These shortcomings appear to stem from structural barriers, including limited gender expertise in policy design, persistent sectoral gender segregation, and weak advocacy for gender-inclusive energy policies. The study highlights the urgent need for systematic collection and use of gender-disaggregated data, the strengthening of procedural justice mechanisms, and the allocation of dedicated funding to support gender-responsive approaches. Addressing these gaps is essential to achieving a truly inclusive and equitable energy transition across the EU.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然欧洲联盟对公正和包容的能源转型作出了强有力的承诺,但在现有政策框架内,性别与能源之间的关系仍然没有得到充分解决。本研究采用了欧盟成员国国家恢复和复原力计划(nrps)中概述的能源转型措施中纳入性别因素的程度,采用了性别与能源关系评估框架。该分析围绕三个关键维度进行:认知能源正义、分配能源正义和程序能源正义。调查结果表明,大多数国家自然资源规划缺乏针对性别的措施,特别是在能源扶贫、消费者支持和包容性决策过程等领域。虽然一些计划包括加强妇女参与STEM教育和能源劳动力的举措,但按性别分列的数据使用有限,严重阻碍了制定有针对性的政策应对措施。少数国家,包括西班牙、奥地利和克罗地亚,在其能源战略中将性别问题纳入主流方面表现出相对坚定的承诺。相比之下,其他国家,如德国、法国和波兰,则很少或根本没有考虑性别因素。这些缺陷似乎源于结构性障碍,包括政策设计中的性别专业知识有限,部门性别隔离持续存在,以及对性别包容性能源政策的宣传力度不足。研究报告强调,迫切需要有系统地收集和使用按性别分列的数据,加强程序司法机制,以及拨出专门资金支持促进性别平等的办法。解决这些差距对于实现整个欧盟真正包容和公平的能源转型至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy transition for whom? Gender dimensions in the European Union recovery and resilience plans
While the European Union has made strong commitments to a just and inclusive energy transition, the gender-energy nexus remains insufficiently addressed within existing policy frameworks. This study applies the NRRPs Gender-Energy Nexus Assessment Framework to assess the extent to which gender considerations are integrated into the energy transition measures outlined in EU Member States' National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs). The analysis is structured around three key dimensions: Recognitional Energy Justice, Distributive Energy Justice, and Procedural Energy Justice. Findings indicate that the majority of NRRPs lack gender-specific measures, particularly in areas such as energy poverty alleviation, consumer support, and inclusive decision-making processes. While some plans include initiatives to enhance women's participation in STEM education and the energy workforce, the limited use of gender-disaggregated data significantly hampers the development of targeted policy responses. A few countries, including Spain, Austria, and Croatia, exhibit relatively stronger commitments to gender mainstreaming in their energy strategies. In contrast, others—such as Germany, France, and Poland—show minimal to no integration of gender considerations. These shortcomings appear to stem from structural barriers, including limited gender expertise in policy design, persistent sectoral gender segregation, and weak advocacy for gender-inclusive energy policies. The study highlights the urgent need for systematic collection and use of gender-disaggregated data, the strengthening of procedural justice mechanisms, and the allocation of dedicated funding to support gender-responsive approaches. Addressing these gaps is essential to achieving a truly inclusive and equitable energy transition across the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信