{"title":"房间里的大象:利用动态能力来连接创新绩效、失败和从失败中学习","authors":"Nabil Amara , Khalil Rhaiem , Norrin Halilem","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Which strategic capabilities simultaneously drive innovation and learning from failures (LFF)? We address this question with two objectives. First, synergies between innovation performance, failures, and LFF strategies are assessed. Second, heterogeneities in the determinants of these processes are explored to identify common and specific predictors for each process. Based on a sample of 436 Canadian SMEs and drawing on the dynamic capabilities theory, we developed an original framework that disentangles the sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capabilities. The econometric exercise revealed that complementarities between innovation failures and LFF and among LFF strategies emerge through complex interactions. Results show nuances regarding levels of microfoundation capabilities, such as those for seizing when managing innovation and LFF. This study provides practical insights for managers on improving innovation performance and capitalizing on unconventional solutions, such as previous failures. We discuss findings along with their theoretical and practical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 6","pages":"Article 100826"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The elephant in the room: Leveraging dynamic capabilities to bridge innovation performance, failure, and learning from failure\",\"authors\":\"Nabil Amara , Khalil Rhaiem , Norrin Halilem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Which strategic capabilities simultaneously drive innovation and learning from failures (LFF)? We address this question with two objectives. First, synergies between innovation performance, failures, and LFF strategies are assessed. Second, heterogeneities in the determinants of these processes are explored to identify common and specific predictors for each process. Based on a sample of 436 Canadian SMEs and drawing on the dynamic capabilities theory, we developed an original framework that disentangles the sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capabilities. The econometric exercise revealed that complementarities between innovation failures and LFF and among LFF strategies emerge through complex interactions. Results show nuances regarding levels of microfoundation capabilities, such as those for seizing when managing innovation and LFF. This study provides practical insights for managers on improving innovation performance and capitalizing on unconventional solutions, such as previous failures. We discuss findings along with their theoretical and practical implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001714\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The elephant in the room: Leveraging dynamic capabilities to bridge innovation performance, failure, and learning from failure
Which strategic capabilities simultaneously drive innovation and learning from failures (LFF)? We address this question with two objectives. First, synergies between innovation performance, failures, and LFF strategies are assessed. Second, heterogeneities in the determinants of these processes are explored to identify common and specific predictors for each process. Based on a sample of 436 Canadian SMEs and drawing on the dynamic capabilities theory, we developed an original framework that disentangles the sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capabilities. The econometric exercise revealed that complementarities between innovation failures and LFF and among LFF strategies emerge through complex interactions. Results show nuances regarding levels of microfoundation capabilities, such as those for seizing when managing innovation and LFF. This study provides practical insights for managers on improving innovation performance and capitalizing on unconventional solutions, such as previous failures. We discuss findings along with their theoretical and practical implications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.