在南非设置姑息治疗沟通的范围审查

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Siobhan de Lange , Jennifer Watermeyer
{"title":"在南非设置姑息治疗沟通的范围审查","authors":"Siobhan de Lange ,&nbsp;Jennifer Watermeyer","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.109378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Effective communication is crucial in palliative care, allowing patients opportunities to make decisions that preserve their personal integrity during significant and life-changing events. How patients communicate and what they prioritise in conversation with a medical professional is affected by a variety of sociocultural factors, expectations and health literacy levels. Communication therefore needs to be understood in the specific context within which it occurs. This review aimed to map existing empirical studies on palliative care communication in the South African context specifically, and is the first scoping review of this kind.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review guidelines were followed, with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. English-language South Africa-specific empirical studies from 1994 onwards were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO and Google Scholar. A search string optimisation procedure was used. Initially, 235 total hits were obtained, from which duplicates, articles irrelevant to the search criteria, and multi-site studies were removed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Full-length, original research studies located in South Africa and focused on palliative care were retained, in which communication or decision-making was a main focus, resulting in 9 articles. A need for greater research capacity and dedicated research spaces for palliative care communication was identified. Certain areas were recognised as requiring specific research focus going forward, such as communication in perinatal palliative care, the timing of certain care conversations, and the communication experiences of patients and their family members, as opposed to healthcare professionals. A lack of locally adapted tools to support palliative communication was noted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both local and international literature concur that an individualised approach to communication in palliative care is needed. Research on palliative care communication in South Africa is crucial for developing contextually appropriate policy, clinical practice and training, thereby helping healthcare professionals to navigate these complicated conversations more effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 109378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review on palliative care communication in the South African setting\",\"authors\":\"Siobhan de Lange ,&nbsp;Jennifer Watermeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2025.109378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Effective communication is crucial in palliative care, allowing patients opportunities to make decisions that preserve their personal integrity during significant and life-changing events. How patients communicate and what they prioritise in conversation with a medical professional is affected by a variety of sociocultural factors, expectations and health literacy levels. Communication therefore needs to be understood in the specific context within which it occurs. This review aimed to map existing empirical studies on palliative care communication in the South African context specifically, and is the first scoping review of this kind.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review guidelines were followed, with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. English-language South Africa-specific empirical studies from 1994 onwards were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO and Google Scholar. A search string optimisation procedure was used. Initially, 235 total hits were obtained, from which duplicates, articles irrelevant to the search criteria, and multi-site studies were removed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Full-length, original research studies located in South Africa and focused on palliative care were retained, in which communication or decision-making was a main focus, resulting in 9 articles. A need for greater research capacity and dedicated research spaces for palliative care communication was identified. Certain areas were recognised as requiring specific research focus going forward, such as communication in perinatal palliative care, the timing of certain care conversations, and the communication experiences of patients and their family members, as opposed to healthcare professionals. A lack of locally adapted tools to support palliative communication was noted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both local and international literature concur that an individualised approach to communication in palliative care is needed. Research on palliative care communication in South Africa is crucial for developing contextually appropriate policy, clinical practice and training, thereby helping healthcare professionals to navigate these complicated conversations more effectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"142 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125007451\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125007451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的沟通在姑息治疗中至关重要,使患者有机会在重大和改变生活的事件中做出决定,保持他们的个人完整性。患者如何与医疗专业人员沟通以及他们在与医疗专业人员交谈时优先考虑什么受到各种社会文化因素、期望和卫生素养水平的影响。因此,沟通需要在它发生的特定语境中被理解。本综述的目的是绘制现有的实证研究缓和治疗沟通在南非的具体情况下,是这种类型的第一次范围审查。方法遵循sarksey和O 'Malley的范围审查指南,并使用PRISMA-ScR检查表。从1994年起,我们从PubMed、Web of Science、EBSCO和b谷歌Scholar中找到了南非特定的英语实证研究。使用了搜索字符串优化程序。最初,获得了235个总点击率,从中删除了重复、与搜索标准无关的文章和多站点研究。结果在南非保留了以姑息治疗为重点的长篇原创性研究,其中沟通或决策是主要焦点,共有9篇文章。确定需要更大的研究能力和专门的研究空间,以促进缓和治疗的交流。某些领域被认为需要具体的研究重点,如围产期姑息治疗中的沟通,某些护理对话的时间,以及患者及其家庭成员(而不是医疗保健专业人员)的沟通经验。会议指出,缺乏适合当地情况的工具来支持姑息性沟通。结论国内外文献一致认为,在姑息治疗中需要个性化的沟通方式。研究在南非姑息治疗沟通是制定适当的政策,临床实践和培训,从而帮助卫生保健专业人员更有效地导航这些复杂的对话至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review on palliative care communication in the South African setting

Objectives

Effective communication is crucial in palliative care, allowing patients opportunities to make decisions that preserve their personal integrity during significant and life-changing events. How patients communicate and what they prioritise in conversation with a medical professional is affected by a variety of sociocultural factors, expectations and health literacy levels. Communication therefore needs to be understood in the specific context within which it occurs. This review aimed to map existing empirical studies on palliative care communication in the South African context specifically, and is the first scoping review of this kind.

Methods

Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review guidelines were followed, with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. English-language South Africa-specific empirical studies from 1994 onwards were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO and Google Scholar. A search string optimisation procedure was used. Initially, 235 total hits were obtained, from which duplicates, articles irrelevant to the search criteria, and multi-site studies were removed.

Results

Full-length, original research studies located in South Africa and focused on palliative care were retained, in which communication or decision-making was a main focus, resulting in 9 articles. A need for greater research capacity and dedicated research spaces for palliative care communication was identified. Certain areas were recognised as requiring specific research focus going forward, such as communication in perinatal palliative care, the timing of certain care conversations, and the communication experiences of patients and their family members, as opposed to healthcare professionals. A lack of locally adapted tools to support palliative communication was noted.

Conclusions

Both local and international literature concur that an individualised approach to communication in palliative care is needed. Research on palliative care communication in South Africa is crucial for developing contextually appropriate policy, clinical practice and training, thereby helping healthcare professionals to navigate these complicated conversations more effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信