Gabriel Aranda Morales , Abhiramini M. Rajiv , Titus Venverloo , Juliane L. Fry
{"title":"颗粒物在哪里:荷兰城市高层建筑排放的PM2.5、PM10、BC和UFP","authors":"Gabriel Aranda Morales , Abhiramini M. Rajiv , Titus Venverloo , Juliane L. Fry","doi":"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2025.100373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Construction sites are major sources of particulate matter pollution to cities, with heavy diesel equipment producing ultrafine particulate matter (UFP), black carbon (BC), and contributing (alongside earth-moving activities) to emissions of fine (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and coarse (PM<sub>10</sub>) dust. These air pollutants are hazardous to the health of those working or living within their plumes. Hence, in this study we characterize the short-term pollutant concentrations at three construction sites in the Netherlands. We measured concentrations of four pollutants at three early-stage high-rise construction sites in Rotterdam and Amsterdam. We find that among the pollutants measured, UFP number concentrations are most strongly correlated with construction activities, with construction site concentrations at high levels of activity ∼20,000 # cm<sup>−3</sup>, while concentrations during periods without construction activity are <5000 # cm<sup>−3</sup>. Although we can attribute concentration peaks to specific pieces of construction equipment, there were no strong correlations between UFPs and the measured concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, as these latter particles have different sources in construction sites (e.g. earthmoving equipment) and in urban settings, as well as longer atmospheric lifetimes. At a relatively more isolated site with one major piece of diesel equipment, we do observe a strong correlation between UFP and BC (R = 0.62), suggesting that such measurements can be used to obtain emissions ratios. As new regulatory standards are being developed for health-hazardous UFP, knowledge of their number concentrations at and near construction sites will be crucial to developing source apportionments and dispersion modeling. We recommend increased measurement of UFP at construction sites, including the use of wearable monitors, to better understand exposure, and creating incentives to shift from diesel to electrical equipment wherever possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37150,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment: X","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where particulates matter: High-rise construction emissions of PM2.5, PM10, BC, and UFP in Dutch cities\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Aranda Morales , Abhiramini M. Rajiv , Titus Venverloo , Juliane L. Fry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2025.100373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Construction sites are major sources of particulate matter pollution to cities, with heavy diesel equipment producing ultrafine particulate matter (UFP), black carbon (BC), and contributing (alongside earth-moving activities) to emissions of fine (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and coarse (PM<sub>10</sub>) dust. These air pollutants are hazardous to the health of those working or living within their plumes. Hence, in this study we characterize the short-term pollutant concentrations at three construction sites in the Netherlands. We measured concentrations of four pollutants at three early-stage high-rise construction sites in Rotterdam and Amsterdam. We find that among the pollutants measured, UFP number concentrations are most strongly correlated with construction activities, with construction site concentrations at high levels of activity ∼20,000 # cm<sup>−3</sup>, while concentrations during periods without construction activity are <5000 # cm<sup>−3</sup>. Although we can attribute concentration peaks to specific pieces of construction equipment, there were no strong correlations between UFPs and the measured concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, as these latter particles have different sources in construction sites (e.g. earthmoving equipment) and in urban settings, as well as longer atmospheric lifetimes. At a relatively more isolated site with one major piece of diesel equipment, we do observe a strong correlation between UFP and BC (R = 0.62), suggesting that such measurements can be used to obtain emissions ratios. As new regulatory standards are being developed for health-hazardous UFP, knowledge of their number concentrations at and near construction sites will be crucial to developing source apportionments and dispersion modeling. We recommend increased measurement of UFP at construction sites, including the use of wearable monitors, to better understand exposure, and creating incentives to shift from diesel to electrical equipment wherever possible.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162125000632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162125000632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
建筑工地是城市颗粒物污染的主要来源,重型柴油设备会产生超细颗粒物(UFP)和黑碳(BC),除了土方活动外,还会排放细颗粒物(PM2.5)和粗颗粒物(PM10)。这些空气污染物对在其烟雾中工作或生活的人的健康有害。因此,在本研究中,我们描述了荷兰三个建筑工地的短期污染物浓度。我们在鹿特丹和阿姆斯特丹的三个早期高层建筑工地测量了四种污染物的浓度。我们发现,在测量到的污染物中,UFP数浓度与建筑活动的相关性最强,建筑工地的UFP浓度处于高活动水平~ 20,000 # cm - 3,而在没有建筑活动期间的UFP浓度为<;5000 # cm - 3。虽然我们可以将浓度峰值归因于特定的建筑设备,但ufp与PM2.5和PM10的测量浓度之间没有很强的相关性,因为后者在建筑工地(例如土方设备)和城市环境中有不同的来源,并且大气寿命更长。在一个相对孤立的地点,只有一个主要的柴油设备,我们确实观察到UFP和BC之间有很强的相关性(R = 0.62),这表明这种测量可以用来获得排放比。由于正在为危害健康的超射光物质制定新的管理标准,因此了解建筑工地及其附近的超射光物质数量浓度对于制定来源分摊和扩散模型至关重要。我们建议在建筑工地增加对UFP的测量,包括使用可穿戴监视器,以更好地了解暴露情况,并尽可能鼓励从柴油设备转向电气设备。
Where particulates matter: High-rise construction emissions of PM2.5, PM10, BC, and UFP in Dutch cities
Construction sites are major sources of particulate matter pollution to cities, with heavy diesel equipment producing ultrafine particulate matter (UFP), black carbon (BC), and contributing (alongside earth-moving activities) to emissions of fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10) dust. These air pollutants are hazardous to the health of those working or living within their plumes. Hence, in this study we characterize the short-term pollutant concentrations at three construction sites in the Netherlands. We measured concentrations of four pollutants at three early-stage high-rise construction sites in Rotterdam and Amsterdam. We find that among the pollutants measured, UFP number concentrations are most strongly correlated with construction activities, with construction site concentrations at high levels of activity ∼20,000 # cm−3, while concentrations during periods without construction activity are <5000 # cm−3. Although we can attribute concentration peaks to specific pieces of construction equipment, there were no strong correlations between UFPs and the measured concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10, as these latter particles have different sources in construction sites (e.g. earthmoving equipment) and in urban settings, as well as longer atmospheric lifetimes. At a relatively more isolated site with one major piece of diesel equipment, we do observe a strong correlation between UFP and BC (R = 0.62), suggesting that such measurements can be used to obtain emissions ratios. As new regulatory standards are being developed for health-hazardous UFP, knowledge of their number concentrations at and near construction sites will be crucial to developing source apportionments and dispersion modeling. We recommend increased measurement of UFP at construction sites, including the use of wearable monitors, to better understand exposure, and creating incentives to shift from diesel to electrical equipment wherever possible.