基于能量和火用的再热布雷顿-再生Kalina循环混合系统的热力学评估和优化

IF 5.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
B.G. Chandra Sekhar , G.Ravi Kiran Sastry , H.N. Das , S.K. Gugulothu
{"title":"基于能量和火用的再热布雷顿-再生Kalina循环混合系统的热力学评估和优化","authors":"B.G. Chandra Sekhar ,&nbsp;G.Ravi Kiran Sastry ,&nbsp;H.N. Das ,&nbsp;S.K. Gugulothu","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has always been a concerted effort to enhance the efficiency of power generation systems, which has significantly rationalized the modern power plants. Taking a leaf out of these works, an endeavour is made to investigate a novel hybrid system of Reheat Brayton and Regenerative Kalina cycles. The assessment protocol involved the framing of molar, energy, and exergy equations for the devices and solving them in the MATLAB environment. Thermodynamic evaluation from both first and second law perspectives using Coke Oven gas (COG) as fuel is the crux of this research. Furthermore, this work includes an optimization study and comparison of the fuels COG, Synthesis gas (SG), and methane in terms of air–fuel ratios, dissociation effects, and greenhouse gas emissions. The Brayton-Kalina power ratio was found to vary from 0.154 to 0.679 at a minimum pressure ratio (r<sub>p</sub>) of 4 for a temperature range of 400 ℃ to 600 ℃. However, with an increase in the pressure ratio, the power ratio also increased appreciably, hovering in the range of 3.57–5.63 at its maximum value. The existence of a temperature-dependent optimum pressure ratio in the range of 8 to 15, wherein the total exergy destruction attains a minimum, is a noteworthy observation. The optimal values of Exergy efficiency, Ecological coefficient of performance, and Air rate are 26.43%, 0.359, and 0.146, respectively. A comparison of fuels revealed that specific carbon emissions were maximum for SG and minimum for methane. The dissociation effects were minimal in SG and the highest in methane gas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 104180"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy and exergy-based thermodynamic assessment and optimization of a reheat Brayton–regenerative Kalina cycle hybrid system\",\"authors\":\"B.G. Chandra Sekhar ,&nbsp;G.Ravi Kiran Sastry ,&nbsp;H.N. Das ,&nbsp;S.K. Gugulothu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There has always been a concerted effort to enhance the efficiency of power generation systems, which has significantly rationalized the modern power plants. Taking a leaf out of these works, an endeavour is made to investigate a novel hybrid system of Reheat Brayton and Regenerative Kalina cycles. The assessment protocol involved the framing of molar, energy, and exergy equations for the devices and solving them in the MATLAB environment. Thermodynamic evaluation from both first and second law perspectives using Coke Oven gas (COG) as fuel is the crux of this research. Furthermore, this work includes an optimization study and comparison of the fuels COG, Synthesis gas (SG), and methane in terms of air–fuel ratios, dissociation effects, and greenhouse gas emissions. The Brayton-Kalina power ratio was found to vary from 0.154 to 0.679 at a minimum pressure ratio (r<sub>p</sub>) of 4 for a temperature range of 400 ℃ to 600 ℃. However, with an increase in the pressure ratio, the power ratio also increased appreciably, hovering in the range of 3.57–5.63 at its maximum value. The existence of a temperature-dependent optimum pressure ratio in the range of 8 to 15, wherein the total exergy destruction attains a minimum, is a noteworthy observation. The optimal values of Exergy efficiency, Ecological coefficient of performance, and Air rate are 26.43%, 0.359, and 0.146, respectively. A comparison of fuels revealed that specific carbon emissions were maximum for SG and minimum for methane. The dissociation effects were minimal in SG and the highest in methane gas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009710\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们一直在努力提高发电系统的效率,这大大合理化了现代发电厂。从这些作品中获得一片叶子,努力研究一种新的再热布雷顿和再生Kalina循环的混合系统。评估方案包括建立设备的摩尔、能量和火用方程,并在MATLAB环境中求解。以焦炉煤气为燃料,从第一定律和第二定律的角度进行热力学评价是本研究的关键。此外,本工作还包括对燃料COG、合成气(SG)和甲烷在空燃比、解离效应和温室气体排放方面的优化研究和比较。在400 ~ 600℃的温度范围内,最小压力比(rp)为4时,布雷顿-卡丽娜功率比的变化范围为0.154 ~ 0.679。但随着压比的增大,功率比也有明显的增大,其最大值徘徊在3.57 ~ 5.63之间。存在一个温度相关的最佳压力比,在8到15的范围内,总火能破坏达到最小,这是一个值得注意的观察结果。其中,火用效率、生态性能系数和空气率的最优值分别为26.43%、0.359和0.146。对不同燃料的比较表明,SG的特定碳排放量最大,而甲烷的最小。分离作用在SG中最小,在甲烷气体中最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy and exergy-based thermodynamic assessment and optimization of a reheat Brayton–regenerative Kalina cycle hybrid system
There has always been a concerted effort to enhance the efficiency of power generation systems, which has significantly rationalized the modern power plants. Taking a leaf out of these works, an endeavour is made to investigate a novel hybrid system of Reheat Brayton and Regenerative Kalina cycles. The assessment protocol involved the framing of molar, energy, and exergy equations for the devices and solving them in the MATLAB environment. Thermodynamic evaluation from both first and second law perspectives using Coke Oven gas (COG) as fuel is the crux of this research. Furthermore, this work includes an optimization study and comparison of the fuels COG, Synthesis gas (SG), and methane in terms of air–fuel ratios, dissociation effects, and greenhouse gas emissions. The Brayton-Kalina power ratio was found to vary from 0.154 to 0.679 at a minimum pressure ratio (rp) of 4 for a temperature range of 400 ℃ to 600 ℃. However, with an increase in the pressure ratio, the power ratio also increased appreciably, hovering in the range of 3.57–5.63 at its maximum value. The existence of a temperature-dependent optimum pressure ratio in the range of 8 to 15, wherein the total exergy destruction attains a minimum, is a noteworthy observation. The optimal values of Exergy efficiency, Ecological coefficient of performance, and Air rate are 26.43%, 0.359, and 0.146, respectively. A comparison of fuels revealed that specific carbon emissions were maximum for SG and minimum for methane. The dissociation effects were minimal in SG and the highest in methane gas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
327
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信