电动汽车与内燃机汽车的驾驶风格差异：能量回收系统带来的变化

IF 7 2区工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS

Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Pub Date : 2025-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2025.104629

Jun Ma , Yiping Wu , Jian Rong , Hongpeng Zhang , Tao Liu , Yiming Jiang , Xiaochao Li

{"title":"电动汽车与内燃机汽车的驾驶风格差异：能量回收系统带来的变化","authors":"Jun Ma , Yiping Wu , Jian Rong , Hongpeng Zhang , Tao Liu , Yiming Jiang , Xiaochao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes how energy recovery systems (ERS) alter driving style and energy consumption in electric vehicles (EVs) using real-world data from EVs and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Results show ERS reduces conservative driving by 61.4 % and increases aggressive driving by 35.5 % compared to ICEVs, as drivers adapt to maximize energy recovery through acceleration-deceleration cycling. Crucially, ERS inverts the energy efficiency hierarchy: normal driving becomes optimal (14.33 kWh/100 km) versus conservative driving in ICEVs. Without ERS, EV energy consumption follows ICEV patterns (16.33 → 19.33 kWh/100 km from conservative → aggressive), but ERS narrows inter-style consumption gaps by 42–68 %. These findings demonstrate that ERS fundamentally reconfigures the behavior-energy relationship, necessitating EV-specific efficiency strategies distinct from ICEV paradigms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 104629"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The difference in driving styles between EVs and ICEVs: changes brought about by the energy recovery system\",\"authors\":\"Jun Ma , Yiping Wu , Jian Rong , Hongpeng Zhang , Tao Liu , Yiming Jiang , Xiaochao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study analyzes how energy recovery systems (ERS) alter driving style and energy consumption in electric vehicles (EVs) using real-world data from EVs and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Results show ERS reduces conservative driving by 61.4 % and increases aggressive driving by 35.5 % compared to ICEVs, as drivers adapt to maximize energy recovery through acceleration-deceleration cycling. Crucially, ERS inverts the energy efficiency hierarchy: normal driving becomes optimal (14.33 kWh/100 km) versus conservative driving in ICEVs. Without ERS, EV energy consumption follows ICEV patterns (16.33 → 19.33 kWh/100 km from conservative → aggressive), but ERS narrows inter-style consumption gaps by 42–68 %. These findings demonstrate that ERS fundamentally reconfigures the behavior-energy relationship, necessitating EV-specific efficiency strategies distinct from ICEV paradigms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825004606\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825004606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用电动汽车和内燃机汽车的真实数据，分析了能量回收系统（ERS）如何改变电动汽车（ev）的驾驶风格和能耗。结果表明，与icev相比，ERS减少了61.4%的保守驾驶，增加了35.5%的激进驾驶，因为驾驶员适应通过加速-减速循环最大化能量回收。至关重要的是，ERS颠倒了能效等级：与icev的保守驾驶相比，正常驾驶（14.33千瓦时/100公里）变得最优。在没有ERS的情况下，电动汽车的能耗遵循ICEV模式（从保守→激进的16.33→19.33千瓦时/100公里），但ERS将车型间的能耗差距缩小了42 - 68%。这些发现表明，ERS从根本上重新配置了行为-能量关系，需要不同于ICEV范式的电动汽车特定效率策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The difference in driving styles between EVs and ICEVs: changes brought about by the energy recovery system

This study analyzes how energy recovery systems (ERS) alter driving style and energy consumption in electric vehicles (EVs) using real-world data from EVs and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Results show ERS reduces conservative driving by 61.4 % and increases aggressive driving by 35.5 % compared to ICEVs, as drivers adapt to maximize energy recovery through acceleration-deceleration cycling. Crucially, ERS inverts the energy efficiency hierarchy: normal driving becomes optimal (14.33 kWh/100 km) versus conservative driving in ICEVs. Without ERS, EV energy consumption follows ICEV patterns (16.33 → 19.33 kWh/100 km from conservative → aggressive), but ERS narrows inter-style consumption gaps by 42–68 %. These findings demonstrate that ERS fundamentally reconfigures the behavior-energy relationship, necessitating EV-specific efficiency strategies distinct from ICEV paradigms.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

CiteScore

12.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

1091

期刊介绍： Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.