{"title":"参与人机交互设计过程中的伦理:不同工作环境中伦理设计实践的研究","authors":"Leonor Costa Tejo , Paula Alexandra Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As technology increasingly permeates daily life, HCI designers must move beyond acknowledging the ethical impacts of the outcomes of their designs to engaging with ethics throughout the design process. While previous research has explored theoretical perspectives and corporate practices, less is known about how ethics is understood and enacted across different professional contexts. This paper investigates how 12 HCI designers from academia, corporate, and applied research settings understand and engage with ethics in their work. Through qualitative interviews, we examined designers’ perspectives on ethics and ethics in the design process, the challenges they face, and the strategies they apply in practice. We found that designers across contexts struggle to define ethics and feel unprepared to address it. They discuss ethics in relation to design practice, and despite shared concerns, our findings show differences among work contexts. Participants are a central concern, with non-corporate designers adopting more formal approaches and deeper participant engagement. Corporate designers take more practical approaches, aligning ethics with company goals. Interviewees described strategies to address ethical challenges, offering insights into how ethics is applied in practice, where applied research designers reflect elements of both academic and corporate settings, combining strategies from each. Our findings also highlight a mismatch between formal ethical approval processes and the evolving nature of design work, where they fall short of supporting ongoing ethical reflection. Our findings offer insight into ethics in diverse HCI contexts and inform future approaches to ethics in HCI design, where we argue for more flexible, work context-specific approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 103634"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging with ethics in the HCI design process: A study of ethical design practice in different work contexts\",\"authors\":\"Leonor Costa Tejo , Paula Alexandra Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As technology increasingly permeates daily life, HCI designers must move beyond acknowledging the ethical impacts of the outcomes of their designs to engaging with ethics throughout the design process. While previous research has explored theoretical perspectives and corporate practices, less is known about how ethics is understood and enacted across different professional contexts. This paper investigates how 12 HCI designers from academia, corporate, and applied research settings understand and engage with ethics in their work. Through qualitative interviews, we examined designers’ perspectives on ethics and ethics in the design process, the challenges they face, and the strategies they apply in practice. We found that designers across contexts struggle to define ethics and feel unprepared to address it. They discuss ethics in relation to design practice, and despite shared concerns, our findings show differences among work contexts. Participants are a central concern, with non-corporate designers adopting more formal approaches and deeper participant engagement. Corporate designers take more practical approaches, aligning ethics with company goals. Interviewees described strategies to address ethical challenges, offering insights into how ethics is applied in practice, where applied research designers reflect elements of both academic and corporate settings, combining strategies from each. Our findings also highlight a mismatch between formal ethical approval processes and the evolving nature of design work, where they fall short of supporting ongoing ethical reflection. Our findings offer insight into ethics in diverse HCI contexts and inform future approaches to ethics in HCI design, where we argue for more flexible, work context-specific approaches.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581925001910\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581925001910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Engaging with ethics in the HCI design process: A study of ethical design practice in different work contexts
As technology increasingly permeates daily life, HCI designers must move beyond acknowledging the ethical impacts of the outcomes of their designs to engaging with ethics throughout the design process. While previous research has explored theoretical perspectives and corporate practices, less is known about how ethics is understood and enacted across different professional contexts. This paper investigates how 12 HCI designers from academia, corporate, and applied research settings understand and engage with ethics in their work. Through qualitative interviews, we examined designers’ perspectives on ethics and ethics in the design process, the challenges they face, and the strategies they apply in practice. We found that designers across contexts struggle to define ethics and feel unprepared to address it. They discuss ethics in relation to design practice, and despite shared concerns, our findings show differences among work contexts. Participants are a central concern, with non-corporate designers adopting more formal approaches and deeper participant engagement. Corporate designers take more practical approaches, aligning ethics with company goals. Interviewees described strategies to address ethical challenges, offering insights into how ethics is applied in practice, where applied research designers reflect elements of both academic and corporate settings, combining strategies from each. Our findings also highlight a mismatch between formal ethical approval processes and the evolving nature of design work, where they fall short of supporting ongoing ethical reflection. Our findings offer insight into ethics in diverse HCI contexts and inform future approaches to ethics in HCI design, where we argue for more flexible, work context-specific approaches.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities.
Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to:
• Innovative interaction techniques
• Multimodal interaction
• Speech interaction
• Graphic interaction
• Natural language interaction
• Interaction in mobile and embedded systems
• Interface design and evaluation methodologies
• Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems
• User interface prototyping and management systems
• Ubiquitous computing
• Wearable computers
• Pervasive computing
• Affective computing
• Empirical studies of user behaviour
• Empirical studies of programming and software engineering
• Computer supported cooperative work
• Computer mediated communication
• Virtual reality
• Mixed and augmented Reality
• Intelligent user interfaces
• Presence
...