{"title":"电子书销售商作为学术图书馆和学术出版商的平台中介:对电子书销售商网页的批评性话语分析","authors":"Mei Zhang , Darshai Hollie","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the intermediary roles of e-book vendors when connecting academic libraries as customers and scholarly publishers as content providers through the lens of platform theories. As the first step of a larger project on e-book vendors' platform governance strategies, it conducts a critical discourse analysis of webpages from six vendors in the humanities and social sciences. The analysis reveals the similarities and differences in vendors' self-identifications towards different audiences and their strategies to attract libraries and publishers. It discusses potential reasons for explaining the unbalanced number of webpages for the library audiences and for the publisher audience, and argues that e-book vendors adopt various strategies to balance control with empowerment of libraries/publishers. This study further identifies that two main commercial e-book vendors- ProQuest and EBSCO- are moving from content providers to information service providers, therefore impacting a wider range of scholarly communication activities. Theoretically, this study brings new perspectives from the library and information science to the broader platform literature. Practically, it helps academic libraries and scholarly publishers better understand e-book vendors' digital marketing strategies, which will assist them in making well-informed decisions when selecting vendors to obtain/provide access to e-books.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-book vendors as platform intermediaries for academic libraries and scholarly publishers: a critical discourse analysis of e-book vendors' webpages\",\"authors\":\"Mei Zhang , Darshai Hollie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the intermediary roles of e-book vendors when connecting academic libraries as customers and scholarly publishers as content providers through the lens of platform theories. As the first step of a larger project on e-book vendors' platform governance strategies, it conducts a critical discourse analysis of webpages from six vendors in the humanities and social sciences. The analysis reveals the similarities and differences in vendors' self-identifications towards different audiences and their strategies to attract libraries and publishers. It discusses potential reasons for explaining the unbalanced number of webpages for the library audiences and for the publisher audience, and argues that e-book vendors adopt various strategies to balance control with empowerment of libraries/publishers. This study further identifies that two main commercial e-book vendors- ProQuest and EBSCO- are moving from content providers to information service providers, therefore impacting a wider range of scholarly communication activities. Theoretically, this study brings new perspectives from the library and information science to the broader platform literature. Practically, it helps academic libraries and scholarly publishers better understand e-book vendors' digital marketing strategies, which will assist them in making well-informed decisions when selecting vendors to obtain/provide access to e-books.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 103147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325001430\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325001430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
E-book vendors as platform intermediaries for academic libraries and scholarly publishers: a critical discourse analysis of e-book vendors' webpages
This study investigates the intermediary roles of e-book vendors when connecting academic libraries as customers and scholarly publishers as content providers through the lens of platform theories. As the first step of a larger project on e-book vendors' platform governance strategies, it conducts a critical discourse analysis of webpages from six vendors in the humanities and social sciences. The analysis reveals the similarities and differences in vendors' self-identifications towards different audiences and their strategies to attract libraries and publishers. It discusses potential reasons for explaining the unbalanced number of webpages for the library audiences and for the publisher audience, and argues that e-book vendors adopt various strategies to balance control with empowerment of libraries/publishers. This study further identifies that two main commercial e-book vendors- ProQuest and EBSCO- are moving from content providers to information service providers, therefore impacting a wider range of scholarly communication activities. Theoretically, this study brings new perspectives from the library and information science to the broader platform literature. Practically, it helps academic libraries and scholarly publishers better understand e-book vendors' digital marketing strategies, which will assist them in making well-informed decisions when selecting vendors to obtain/provide access to e-books.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.