员工应对数字化和知识的创造性偏差:员工悖论心态的中介作用

IF 15.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Basmah S. Alzamil
{"title":"员工应对数字化和知识的创造性偏差:员工悖论心态的中介作用","authors":"Basmah S. Alzamil","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advancements in digital technology have enabled organizations to efficiently handle various work tasks and processes through modern technological solutions. Bringing about organizational change is associated with many challenges. Thus, this study examines how employees engage in creative deviance to face the stress of digital tension. This study also examines the intermediate role of the paradox mindset. Paradox theory was used to examine all of the relationships in the study. The study model was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) in Amos. Results of an online survey with 241 employees in the communication and information technology sector in Saudi Arabia revealed that employees engage in creative deviance as a response to digitalization represented in digital leadership. Additionally, paradox mindset functions as an intermediary variable in the relationship between digital leadership and creative deviance. These findings provide valuable insights into tension management within the organizational context. They also broaden the understanding of the paradox theory through its application to employees’ behaviors in times of tension.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 6","pages":"Article 100845"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employees' creative deviance in response to digitalization and knowledge: the mediating role of employees’ Paradox mindset\",\"authors\":\"Basmah S. Alzamil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advancements in digital technology have enabled organizations to efficiently handle various work tasks and processes through modern technological solutions. Bringing about organizational change is associated with many challenges. Thus, this study examines how employees engage in creative deviance to face the stress of digital tension. This study also examines the intermediate role of the paradox mindset. Paradox theory was used to examine all of the relationships in the study. The study model was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) in Amos. Results of an online survey with 241 employees in the communication and information technology sector in Saudi Arabia revealed that employees engage in creative deviance as a response to digitalization represented in digital leadership. Additionally, paradox mindset functions as an intermediary variable in the relationship between digital leadership and creative deviance. These findings provide valuable insights into tension management within the organizational context. They also broaden the understanding of the paradox theory through its application to employees’ behaviors in times of tension.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001908\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001908","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字技术的进步使组织能够通过现代技术解决方案有效地处理各种工作任务和流程。组织变革伴随着许多挑战。因此,本研究考察了员工如何从事创造性偏差来面对数字紧张的压力。本研究亦探讨悖论心态的中介作用。悖论理论被用来检验研究中的所有关系。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对研究模型进行分析。一项针对沙特阿拉伯通信和信息技术行业241名员工的在线调查结果显示,员工从事创造性越轨行为是对数字化领导所代表的数字化的回应。此外,悖论思维在数字领导与创造性偏差的关系中起中介变量的作用。这些发现为组织背景下的紧张管理提供了有价值的见解。他们还通过将悖论理论应用于员工在紧张时期的行为,拓宽了对悖论理论的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employees' creative deviance in response to digitalization and knowledge: the mediating role of employees’ Paradox mindset
Advancements in digital technology have enabled organizations to efficiently handle various work tasks and processes through modern technological solutions. Bringing about organizational change is associated with many challenges. Thus, this study examines how employees engage in creative deviance to face the stress of digital tension. This study also examines the intermediate role of the paradox mindset. Paradox theory was used to examine all of the relationships in the study. The study model was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) in Amos. Results of an online survey with 241 employees in the communication and information technology sector in Saudi Arabia revealed that employees engage in creative deviance as a response to digitalization represented in digital leadership. Additionally, paradox mindset functions as an intermediary variable in the relationship between digital leadership and creative deviance. These findings provide valuable insights into tension management within the organizational context. They also broaden the understanding of the paradox theory through its application to employees’ behaviors in times of tension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信