Maria C. Porada , Rachel A. Davidson , Joseph E. Trainor , Gina Hardy , Linda K. Nozick , Meghan Millea , Jamie Kruse , Farah Nibbs
{"title":"业主在改造决策过程中的影响因素","authors":"Maria C. Porada , Rachel A. Davidson , Joseph E. Trainor , Gina Hardy , Linda K. Nozick , Meghan Millea , Jamie Kruse , Farah Nibbs","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To better understand why homeowners tend not to strengthen their homes to reduce hurricane damage, we adopt a recently introduced analysis approach that, for the first time, treats the decision to retrofit as a multi-stage process. It uses the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) as a theoretical framework and a multi-state Markov model to represent the process quantitatively. In this study, we extend the method to determine which attributes of the household, house, and/or incentive program are associated with an increased likelihood of transitioning through the stages of the mitigation process using the North Carolina Insurance Underwriting Association (NCIUA) Strengthen Your Roof grant incentive program as a case study. The results suggest that different factors influence different transitions in the mitigation process and to varying degrees. A homeowner’s social network was highly effective in raising awareness of grant incentive programs and encouraging homeowners to decide to select a contractor to do the work. Homeowners’ perceptions of the retrofit’s effectiveness largely fostered homeowner engagement in the application phase and further encouraged homeowners to decide to apply for the grant. Overall, the insights from this study help us understand what motivates homeowners at different points in the decision to retrofit providing guidance in designing future mitigation programs that will maximize outreach, increase engagement, and enhance adoption rates of such retrofits. In addition to the practical implications, this methodology has potential for broader applications across different types of mitigation programs, geographic regions, and hazard types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 105790"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing homeowners in the process of retrofit decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Maria C. Porada , Rachel A. Davidson , Joseph E. Trainor , Gina Hardy , Linda K. Nozick , Meghan Millea , Jamie Kruse , Farah Nibbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To better understand why homeowners tend not to strengthen their homes to reduce hurricane damage, we adopt a recently introduced analysis approach that, for the first time, treats the decision to retrofit as a multi-stage process. It uses the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) as a theoretical framework and a multi-state Markov model to represent the process quantitatively. In this study, we extend the method to determine which attributes of the household, house, and/or incentive program are associated with an increased likelihood of transitioning through the stages of the mitigation process using the North Carolina Insurance Underwriting Association (NCIUA) Strengthen Your Roof grant incentive program as a case study. The results suggest that different factors influence different transitions in the mitigation process and to varying degrees. A homeowner’s social network was highly effective in raising awareness of grant incentive programs and encouraging homeowners to decide to select a contractor to do the work. Homeowners’ perceptions of the retrofit’s effectiveness largely fostered homeowner engagement in the application phase and further encouraged homeowners to decide to apply for the grant. Overall, the insights from this study help us understand what motivates homeowners at different points in the decision to retrofit providing guidance in designing future mitigation programs that will maximize outreach, increase engagement, and enhance adoption rates of such retrofits. In addition to the practical implications, this methodology has potential for broader applications across different types of mitigation programs, geographic regions, and hazard types.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006144\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006144","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors influencing homeowners in the process of retrofit decision-making
To better understand why homeowners tend not to strengthen their homes to reduce hurricane damage, we adopt a recently introduced analysis approach that, for the first time, treats the decision to retrofit as a multi-stage process. It uses the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) as a theoretical framework and a multi-state Markov model to represent the process quantitatively. In this study, we extend the method to determine which attributes of the household, house, and/or incentive program are associated with an increased likelihood of transitioning through the stages of the mitigation process using the North Carolina Insurance Underwriting Association (NCIUA) Strengthen Your Roof grant incentive program as a case study. The results suggest that different factors influence different transitions in the mitigation process and to varying degrees. A homeowner’s social network was highly effective in raising awareness of grant incentive programs and encouraging homeowners to decide to select a contractor to do the work. Homeowners’ perceptions of the retrofit’s effectiveness largely fostered homeowner engagement in the application phase and further encouraged homeowners to decide to apply for the grant. Overall, the insights from this study help us understand what motivates homeowners at different points in the decision to retrofit providing guidance in designing future mitigation programs that will maximize outreach, increase engagement, and enhance adoption rates of such retrofits. In addition to the practical implications, this methodology has potential for broader applications across different types of mitigation programs, geographic regions, and hazard types.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.