受面内剪切和重力荷载作用的护套轻钢板的性能和设计

IF 6.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Nikolas Ringas , R. Mark Lawson , Dilum Fernando , Yuner Huang
{"title":"受面内剪切和重力荷载作用的护套轻钢板的性能和设计","authors":"Nikolas Ringas ,&nbsp;R. Mark Lawson ,&nbsp;Dilum Fernando ,&nbsp;Yuner Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2025.114047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The in-plane shear behaviour of sheathed light gauge steel wall panels is investigated by tests on 2.4 m square wall panels together with push-out tests, to determine the shear fixing stiffness and resistance. Parameters such as sheathing material, screw geometry, stud arrangement, adhesives, combined bracing with sheathing boards, and profiled sheeting were considered. An X-braced panel was used as a benchmark and to interpret the forces in the bracing obtained from measured strains. Wall panels with single C- and back-to-back C- sections in the middle of the panel have equivalent shear stiffness and resistance. The use of non-winged fixings can significantly enhance the stiffness of the panel due to increased thread engagement with the board material. Adhesives on the board-frame interface reduce damage evolution on the board material, while significantly increasing both stiffness and resistance. The tests also included the combination of X-bracing and sheathing boards to determine how their stiffnesses may be combined. It was also shown that profiled steel sheets serve as a potential alternative to X-bracing, although they require more fixings. The design approach based on elastic theory for the fixing properties obtained from push-out tests is in close agreement with the test results obtained from the representative wall panel tests, where the ratio of the recorded to the predicted panel shear stiffness and resistance have an average of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively, with a variation of up to 8 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 114047"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behaviour and design of sheathed light gauge steel panels subjected to in-plane shear and gravity loads\",\"authors\":\"Nikolas Ringas ,&nbsp;R. Mark Lawson ,&nbsp;Dilum Fernando ,&nbsp;Yuner Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tws.2025.114047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The in-plane shear behaviour of sheathed light gauge steel wall panels is investigated by tests on 2.4 m square wall panels together with push-out tests, to determine the shear fixing stiffness and resistance. Parameters such as sheathing material, screw geometry, stud arrangement, adhesives, combined bracing with sheathing boards, and profiled sheeting were considered. An X-braced panel was used as a benchmark and to interpret the forces in the bracing obtained from measured strains. Wall panels with single C- and back-to-back C- sections in the middle of the panel have equivalent shear stiffness and resistance. The use of non-winged fixings can significantly enhance the stiffness of the panel due to increased thread engagement with the board material. Adhesives on the board-frame interface reduce damage evolution on the board material, while significantly increasing both stiffness and resistance. The tests also included the combination of X-bracing and sheathing boards to determine how their stiffnesses may be combined. It was also shown that profiled steel sheets serve as a potential alternative to X-bracing, although they require more fixings. The design approach based on elastic theory for the fixing properties obtained from push-out tests is in close agreement with the test results obtained from the representative wall panel tests, where the ratio of the recorded to the predicted panel shear stiffness and resistance have an average of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively, with a variation of up to 8 %.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"volume\":\"218 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026382312501136X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026382312501136X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对2.4 m方薄壁板进行面内剪切试验,并结合推出试验,研究了护套轻钢墙板的面内剪切性能,确定了剪力固定刚度和阻力。考虑了护套材料、螺钉几何形状、螺柱排列、粘合剂、护套板组合支撑和异形板等参数。x支撑面板被用作基准,并解释从测量应变获得的支撑中的力。在墙板中间有单C型和背靠背C型截面的墙板具有等效的抗剪刚度和阻力。使用无翼固定可以显著提高面板的刚度,因为增加了螺纹与板材料的接触。板-框架界面上的粘合剂减少了板材料的损伤演变,同时显着增加了刚度和阻力。测试还包括x支撑和护套板的组合,以确定它们的刚度如何组合。研究还表明,异形钢板可以作为x型支撑的潜在替代品,尽管它们需要更多的固定装置。基于弹性理论的设计方法,从推出试验中获得的固定性能与从代表性墙板试验中获得的试验结果非常一致,其中记录的与预测的面板剪切刚度和阻力的比率分别为1.03和1.05,差异可达8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behaviour and design of sheathed light gauge steel panels subjected to in-plane shear and gravity loads
The in-plane shear behaviour of sheathed light gauge steel wall panels is investigated by tests on 2.4 m square wall panels together with push-out tests, to determine the shear fixing stiffness and resistance. Parameters such as sheathing material, screw geometry, stud arrangement, adhesives, combined bracing with sheathing boards, and profiled sheeting were considered. An X-braced panel was used as a benchmark and to interpret the forces in the bracing obtained from measured strains. Wall panels with single C- and back-to-back C- sections in the middle of the panel have equivalent shear stiffness and resistance. The use of non-winged fixings can significantly enhance the stiffness of the panel due to increased thread engagement with the board material. Adhesives on the board-frame interface reduce damage evolution on the board material, while significantly increasing both stiffness and resistance. The tests also included the combination of X-bracing and sheathing boards to determine how their stiffnesses may be combined. It was also shown that profiled steel sheets serve as a potential alternative to X-bracing, although they require more fixings. The design approach based on elastic theory for the fixing properties obtained from push-out tests is in close agreement with the test results obtained from the representative wall panel tests, where the ratio of the recorded to the predicted panel shear stiffness and resistance have an average of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively, with a variation of up to 8 %.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信