新出现的同步性和同步性过渡及其对社会交往适应性中隶属关系发展的影响:不同同步性和同步性过渡检测方法的比较计算分析

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sophie C.F. Hendrikse , Jan Treur , Sander L. Koole
{"title":"新出现的同步性和同步性过渡及其对社会交往适应性中隶属关系发展的影响:不同同步性和同步性过渡检测方法的比较计算分析","authors":"Sophie C.F. Hendrikse ,&nbsp;Jan Treur ,&nbsp;Sander L. Koole","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interpersonal synchrony often emerges during social interaction and in turn is linked to better interpersonal affiliation. In addition, transitions in synchrony – meaning switching between moving in and out of sync − also occur often. It might be assumed that transitions in synchrony, especially when the extent of synchrony decreases, negatively affect affiliation. Nevertheless, there is empirical evidence indicating that time periods with transitions in synchrony can have an even stronger positive effect on affiliation or liking in comparison to time periods without transitions in synchrony, possibly highlighting that timing of synchrony episodes is of equal importance for being considered as the extent of synchrony episodes is. This paper presents multiple systematic analyses of both phenomena based on an adaptive agent model simulating how persons’ affiliation might benefit both from emerging synchrony and transitions in synchrony. Both for detection of synchrony and detection of synchrony transitions, multiple methods have been proposed in the literature and applied (from an external observer viewpoint) to identify or detect forms of emerging synchrony or synchrony transitions in given pairs of time series. We systematically evaluate through simulations the performance of multiple combinations of synchrony detection methods that have been incorporated in our developed adaptive agent model. These methods model the agent’s subjective detection of synchrony and synchrony transitions. We explored and compared the synchrony scores from the following methods: complemental difference, Pearson correlation coefficient, signal matching and average mutual information. Regarding the transition detection of synchrony scores, we examined the following three methods: standard deviation based, average based, and maximum-minimum based. In a comparative manner we evaluated all 12 combinations of synchrony detection and transition detection methods in our adaptive agent model in simulation experiments for two agents with a setup in which a number of situations were encountered in different (time) episodes. Moreover, also the subjective synchrony and transition detection of each of the two agents were mutually compared and their subjective detections were compared to objective detections from an external observer viewpoint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging synchrony and synchrony transitions and their effects on development of affiliation in social interaction adaptivity: Comparative computational analysis of different synchrony and synchrony transition detection methods\",\"authors\":\"Sophie C.F. Hendrikse ,&nbsp;Jan Treur ,&nbsp;Sander L. Koole\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Interpersonal synchrony often emerges during social interaction and in turn is linked to better interpersonal affiliation. In addition, transitions in synchrony – meaning switching between moving in and out of sync − also occur often. It might be assumed that transitions in synchrony, especially when the extent of synchrony decreases, negatively affect affiliation. Nevertheless, there is empirical evidence indicating that time periods with transitions in synchrony can have an even stronger positive effect on affiliation or liking in comparison to time periods without transitions in synchrony, possibly highlighting that timing of synchrony episodes is of equal importance for being considered as the extent of synchrony episodes is. This paper presents multiple systematic analyses of both phenomena based on an adaptive agent model simulating how persons’ affiliation might benefit both from emerging synchrony and transitions in synchrony. Both for detection of synchrony and detection of synchrony transitions, multiple methods have been proposed in the literature and applied (from an external observer viewpoint) to identify or detect forms of emerging synchrony or synchrony transitions in given pairs of time series. We systematically evaluate through simulations the performance of multiple combinations of synchrony detection methods that have been incorporated in our developed adaptive agent model. These methods model the agent’s subjective detection of synchrony and synchrony transitions. We explored and compared the synchrony scores from the following methods: complemental difference, Pearson correlation coefficient, signal matching and average mutual information. Regarding the transition detection of synchrony scores, we examined the following three methods: standard deviation based, average based, and maximum-minimum based. In a comparative manner we evaluated all 12 combinations of synchrony detection and transition detection methods in our adaptive agent model in simulation experiments for two agents with a setup in which a number of situations were encountered in different (time) episodes. Moreover, also the subjective synchrony and transition detection of each of the two agents were mutually compared and their subjective detections were compared to objective detections from an external observer viewpoint.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人际同步性通常在社会交往中出现,反过来又与更好的人际关系有关。此外,同步中的转换——即在同步和不同步之间的切换——也经常发生。可以假设,同步的转变,特别是当同步程度降低时,会对隶属关系产生负面影响。然而,有经验证据表明,与没有同步过渡的时间段相比,同步过渡的时间段对从属关系或喜好有更强的积极影响,这可能强调了同步情节的时间与同步情节的程度同等重要。本文基于自适应代理模型对这两种现象进行了多系统分析,模拟了人们的隶属关系如何从同步的出现和同步的转变中受益。对于同步检测和同步转换检测,文献中已经提出了多种方法,并应用(从外部观察者的角度)来识别或检测给定时间序列对中出现的同步或同步转换形式。我们通过模拟系统地评估了同步检测方法的多种组合的性能,这些方法已纳入我们开发的自适应代理模型中。这些方法模拟了智能体对同步和同步转换的主观检测。我们从互补差、Pearson相关系数、信号匹配和平均互信息四个方面对同步性评分进行了探讨和比较。关于同步分数的过渡检测,我们研究了以下三种方法:基于标准差的方法、基于平均值的方法和基于最大值-最小值的方法。在模拟实验中,我们以比较的方式评估了自适应智能体模型中同步检测和过渡检测方法的所有12种组合,其中两个智能体在不同的(时间)事件中遇到了许多情况。此外,还相互比较了两个主体的主观同步和过渡检测,并将其主观检测与外部观察者的客观检测进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emerging synchrony and synchrony transitions and their effects on development of affiliation in social interaction adaptivity: Comparative computational analysis of different synchrony and synchrony transition detection methods
Interpersonal synchrony often emerges during social interaction and in turn is linked to better interpersonal affiliation. In addition, transitions in synchrony – meaning switching between moving in and out of sync − also occur often. It might be assumed that transitions in synchrony, especially when the extent of synchrony decreases, negatively affect affiliation. Nevertheless, there is empirical evidence indicating that time periods with transitions in synchrony can have an even stronger positive effect on affiliation or liking in comparison to time periods without transitions in synchrony, possibly highlighting that timing of synchrony episodes is of equal importance for being considered as the extent of synchrony episodes is. This paper presents multiple systematic analyses of both phenomena based on an adaptive agent model simulating how persons’ affiliation might benefit both from emerging synchrony and transitions in synchrony. Both for detection of synchrony and detection of synchrony transitions, multiple methods have been proposed in the literature and applied (from an external observer viewpoint) to identify or detect forms of emerging synchrony or synchrony transitions in given pairs of time series. We systematically evaluate through simulations the performance of multiple combinations of synchrony detection methods that have been incorporated in our developed adaptive agent model. These methods model the agent’s subjective detection of synchrony and synchrony transitions. We explored and compared the synchrony scores from the following methods: complemental difference, Pearson correlation coefficient, signal matching and average mutual information. Regarding the transition detection of synchrony scores, we examined the following three methods: standard deviation based, average based, and maximum-minimum based. In a comparative manner we evaluated all 12 combinations of synchrony detection and transition detection methods in our adaptive agent model in simulation experiments for two agents with a setup in which a number of situations were encountered in different (time) episodes. Moreover, also the subjective synchrony and transition detection of each of the two agents were mutually compared and their subjective detections were compared to objective detections from an external observer viewpoint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信