维护自主权:关注机器学习决策系统

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Paula Subías-Beltrán , Oriol Pujol , Itziar de Lecuona
{"title":"维护自主权:关注机器学习决策系统","authors":"Paula Subías-Beltrán ,&nbsp;Oriol Pujol ,&nbsp;Itziar de Lecuona","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global discourse on AI regulation gains momentum, this paper focuses on delineating the impact of ML on autonomy and fostering awareness. Respect for autonomy is a basic principle in bioethics that establishes people as decision-makers. While the concept of autonomy in the context of ML appears in several European normative publications, it remains a theoretical concept that has yet to be widely accepted in ML practice. Our contribution is to bridge the gap between theory and practice in ML by encouraging the respect of autonomy in ML-aided decision-making. We do this by proposing a clear framework for operationalizing autonomy and identifying the conditioning factors that currently prevent it. Consequently, we focus on the different stages of the ML pipeline to identify the potential effects on ML end-users’ autonomy. To improve its practical utility, we propose a related question for each detected impact, offering guidance for identifying possible focus points to respect ML end-users autonomy in decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safeguarding autonomy: A focus on machine learning decision systems\",\"authors\":\"Paula Subías-Beltrán ,&nbsp;Oriol Pujol ,&nbsp;Itziar de Lecuona\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As global discourse on AI regulation gains momentum, this paper focuses on delineating the impact of ML on autonomy and fostering awareness. Respect for autonomy is a basic principle in bioethics that establishes people as decision-makers. While the concept of autonomy in the context of ML appears in several European normative publications, it remains a theoretical concept that has yet to be widely accepted in ML practice. Our contribution is to bridge the gap between theory and practice in ML by encouraging the respect of autonomy in ML-aided decision-making. We do this by proposing a clear framework for operationalizing autonomy and identifying the conditioning factors that currently prevent it. Consequently, we focus on the different stages of the ML pipeline to identify the potential effects on ML end-users’ autonomy. To improve its practical utility, we propose a related question for each detected impact, offering guidance for identifying possible focus points to respect ML end-users autonomy in decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000932\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球关于人工智能监管的讨论势头日益强劲,本文重点阐述了机器学习对自主性的影响和培养意识。尊重自主权是生命伦理学的基本原则,它确立了人作为决策者的地位。虽然机器学习背景下的自治概念出现在一些欧洲规范性出版物中,但它仍然是一个理论概念,尚未在机器学习实践中被广泛接受。我们的贡献是通过鼓励尊重机器学习辅助决策中的自主权来弥合机器学习理论和实践之间的差距。为此,我们提出了一个实现自治的明确框架,并确定了目前阻碍自治的制约因素。因此,我们关注机器学习管道的不同阶段,以确定对机器学习最终用户自主性的潜在影响。为了提高其实际效用,我们为每个检测到的影响提出了一个相关的问题,为识别可能的焦点提供指导,以尊重ML最终用户在决策中的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safeguarding autonomy: A focus on machine learning decision systems
As global discourse on AI regulation gains momentum, this paper focuses on delineating the impact of ML on autonomy and fostering awareness. Respect for autonomy is a basic principle in bioethics that establishes people as decision-makers. While the concept of autonomy in the context of ML appears in several European normative publications, it remains a theoretical concept that has yet to be widely accepted in ML practice. Our contribution is to bridge the gap between theory and practice in ML by encouraging the respect of autonomy in ML-aided decision-making. We do this by proposing a clear framework for operationalizing autonomy and identifying the conditioning factors that currently prevent it. Consequently, we focus on the different stages of the ML pipeline to identify the potential effects on ML end-users’ autonomy. To improve its practical utility, we propose a related question for each detected impact, offering guidance for identifying possible focus points to respect ML end-users autonomy in decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信