痴呆症患者的第三波行为干预:系统回顾

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ty B. Aller , Heather H. Kelley , Marissa L. Donahue , Elizabeth B. Fauth
{"title":"痴呆症患者的第三波行为干预:系统回顾","authors":"Ty B. Aller ,&nbsp;Heather H. Kelley ,&nbsp;Marissa L. Donahue ,&nbsp;Elizabeth B. Fauth","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Worldwide, over 10 million individuals are diagnosed with a dementia-related disease each year. Individuals often report increased depression and anxiety after receiving a dementia diagnosis. Third wave cognitive behavioral interventions are beneficial for improving mental health symptoms in persons without dementia. There is not, however, clear conclusions on if these interventions are feasible, acceptable, and effective for individuals with dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this preregistered study (<span><span>https://osf.io/u2njw</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) was to review the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of third wave cognitive behavioral interventions for self-reported psychological well-being of individuals with a dementia diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was carried out on studies examining third-wave cognitive behavioral interventions for individuals with a dementia diagnosis published between 2012 and 2023 using APA PsycINFO, Academic Search Ultimate, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Science Reference Center.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>10 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 7 were unique studies and 3 were supplemental studies using a similar dataset. Most studies took place in the United Kingdom and included varying designs (e.g., single-arm, case study, randomized control trial). A total of 229 participants were included in this review, most of which were diagnosed with either Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, mixed dementia, or dementia unspecified. Mindfulness-based interventions were most used (k = 3) and interventions were primarily delivered via group sessions. Adaptations included shortening session intensity (e.g., fewer sessions, fewer activities) and making materials more accessible (e.g., larger fonts, fewer words). The most common outcome assessed was quality of life. Results of studies were mixed; some reported improvements while others reported null or negative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Third wave behavioral interventions seem to be preliminarily feasible and acceptable for individuals with dementia. The efficacy of these interventions for individuals with a dementia diagnosis is still unclear. Adaptations included basic accessibility considerations. Future research should emphasize the need for more rigorous study design, increased sample sizes, and consistency in intervention adaptations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100942"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third wave behavioral interventions for individuals with Dementia: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Ty B. Aller ,&nbsp;Heather H. Kelley ,&nbsp;Marissa L. Donahue ,&nbsp;Elizabeth B. Fauth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Worldwide, over 10 million individuals are diagnosed with a dementia-related disease each year. Individuals often report increased depression and anxiety after receiving a dementia diagnosis. Third wave cognitive behavioral interventions are beneficial for improving mental health symptoms in persons without dementia. There is not, however, clear conclusions on if these interventions are feasible, acceptable, and effective for individuals with dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this preregistered study (<span><span>https://osf.io/u2njw</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) was to review the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of third wave cognitive behavioral interventions for self-reported psychological well-being of individuals with a dementia diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was carried out on studies examining third-wave cognitive behavioral interventions for individuals with a dementia diagnosis published between 2012 and 2023 using APA PsycINFO, Academic Search Ultimate, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Science Reference Center.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>10 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 7 were unique studies and 3 were supplemental studies using a similar dataset. Most studies took place in the United Kingdom and included varying designs (e.g., single-arm, case study, randomized control trial). A total of 229 participants were included in this review, most of which were diagnosed with either Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, mixed dementia, or dementia unspecified. Mindfulness-based interventions were most used (k = 3) and interventions were primarily delivered via group sessions. Adaptations included shortening session intensity (e.g., fewer sessions, fewer activities) and making materials more accessible (e.g., larger fonts, fewer words). The most common outcome assessed was quality of life. Results of studies were mixed; some reported improvements while others reported null or negative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Third wave behavioral interventions seem to be preliminarily feasible and acceptable for individuals with dementia. The efficacy of these interventions for individuals with a dementia diagnosis is still unclear. Adaptations included basic accessibility considerations. Future research should emphasize the need for more rigorous study design, increased sample sizes, and consistency in intervention adaptations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000742\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在世界范围内,每年有超过1000万人被诊断患有痴呆症相关疾病。在接受痴呆症诊断后,人们经常报告抑郁和焦虑增加。第三波认知行为干预有利于改善无痴呆患者的心理健康症状。然而,对于这些干预措施对痴呆症患者是否可行、可接受和有效,目前还没有明确的结论。本预注册研究(https://osf.io/u2njw)的目的是回顾第三波认知行为干预对痴呆诊断个体自我报告心理健康的可行性、可接受性和有效性。方法系统回顾2012年至2023年间发表的对痴呆患者进行第三波认知行为干预的研究,使用APA PsycINFO, Academic Search Ultimate, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Psychology and behavioral Sciences Collection, Science Reference Center。结果10项研究符合纳入标准,其中7项为独特研究,3项为使用相似数据集的补充研究。大多数研究在英国进行,包括不同的设计(例如,单臂、病例研究、随机对照试验)。本综述共纳入229名参与者,其中大多数被诊断为阿尔茨海默病、血管性痴呆、混合性痴呆或未明确的痴呆。最常用的是基于正念的干预(k = 3),干预主要通过小组会议进行。调整包括缩短会议强度(例如,更少的会议,更少的活动)和使材料更容易获得(例如,更大的字体,更少的单词)。最常见的评估结果是生活质量。研究结果喜忧参半;一些人报告了改善,而另一些人报告了零结果或负面结果。结论第三波行为干预对痴呆患者是初步可行和可接受的。这些干预措施对痴呆患者的疗效尚不清楚。调整包括基本的可访问性考虑。未来的研究应强调需要更严格的研究设计,增加样本量,以及干预适应的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third wave behavioral interventions for individuals with Dementia: A systematic review

Introduction

Worldwide, over 10 million individuals are diagnosed with a dementia-related disease each year. Individuals often report increased depression and anxiety after receiving a dementia diagnosis. Third wave cognitive behavioral interventions are beneficial for improving mental health symptoms in persons without dementia. There is not, however, clear conclusions on if these interventions are feasible, acceptable, and effective for individuals with dementia.

Objectives

The aim of this preregistered study (https://osf.io/u2njw) was to review the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of third wave cognitive behavioral interventions for self-reported psychological well-being of individuals with a dementia diagnosis.

Methods

A systematic review was carried out on studies examining third-wave cognitive behavioral interventions for individuals with a dementia diagnosis published between 2012 and 2023 using APA PsycINFO, Academic Search Ultimate, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Science Reference Center.

Results

10 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 7 were unique studies and 3 were supplemental studies using a similar dataset. Most studies took place in the United Kingdom and included varying designs (e.g., single-arm, case study, randomized control trial). A total of 229 participants were included in this review, most of which were diagnosed with either Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, mixed dementia, or dementia unspecified. Mindfulness-based interventions were most used (k = 3) and interventions were primarily delivered via group sessions. Adaptations included shortening session intensity (e.g., fewer sessions, fewer activities) and making materials more accessible (e.g., larger fonts, fewer words). The most common outcome assessed was quality of life. Results of studies were mixed; some reported improvements while others reported null or negative outcomes.

Conclusion

Third wave behavioral interventions seem to be preliminarily feasible and acceptable for individuals with dementia. The efficacy of these interventions for individuals with a dementia diagnosis is still unclear. Adaptations included basic accessibility considerations. Future research should emphasize the need for more rigorous study design, increased sample sizes, and consistency in intervention adaptations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信