国家不做贸易,公司做贸易:对CETA的企业层面评估

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Lucian Cernat , Carmen Díaz-Mora , Salvador Gil-Pareja , Silvio Esteve
{"title":"国家不做贸易,公司做贸易:对CETA的企业层面评估","authors":"Lucian Cernat ,&nbsp;Carmen Díaz-Mora ,&nbsp;Salvador Gil-Pareja ,&nbsp;Silvio Esteve","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of free trade agreements (FTAs) has been analysed by numerous empirical studies that focus on their effect on trade values. But what about the number of trading firms? Do FTAs lead to new firms becoming exporters or importers? Using data from the OECD-Eurostat Trade by Enterprise Characteristics dataset and estimating a structural gravity model, this paper examines the effect of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) on the number of EU exporting and importing firms. When debating its future effects during the negotiations, the CETA agreement was the subject of both hope and criticism, including its potential negative effect on small firms. We explore the heterogeneous response of firms to CETA by sector, firm size and EU country. We find a positive but diverse response from EU firms to the opportunities offered by the CETA agreement. On average, CETA increased the number of EU exporting firms by around 11%. The largest increases were found in Spain and Lithuania (over 30%), while the lowest increases were in Italy (8.7%). The increase in the number of trading firms has been higher for small than for large firms. These findings underscore the importance of considering firm-level impacts in trade policy assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 104672"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Countries don’t trade, firms do: A firm-level assessment of CETA\",\"authors\":\"Lucian Cernat ,&nbsp;Carmen Díaz-Mora ,&nbsp;Salvador Gil-Pareja ,&nbsp;Silvio Esteve\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The impact of free trade agreements (FTAs) has been analysed by numerous empirical studies that focus on their effect on trade values. But what about the number of trading firms? Do FTAs lead to new firms becoming exporters or importers? Using data from the OECD-Eurostat Trade by Enterprise Characteristics dataset and estimating a structural gravity model, this paper examines the effect of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) on the number of EU exporting and importing firms. When debating its future effects during the negotiations, the CETA agreement was the subject of both hope and criticism, including its potential negative effect on small firms. We explore the heterogeneous response of firms to CETA by sector, firm size and EU country. We find a positive but diverse response from EU firms to the opportunities offered by the CETA agreement. On average, CETA increased the number of EU exporting firms by around 11%. The largest increases were found in Spain and Lithuania (over 30%), while the lowest increases were in Italy (8.7%). The increase in the number of trading firms has been higher for small than for large firms. These findings underscore the importance of considering firm-level impacts in trade policy assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025008354\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025008354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自由贸易协定(FTAs)的影响已经被大量的实证研究所分析,这些研究的重点是它们对贸易价值的影响。但是贸易公司的数量呢?自由贸易协定会导致新公司成为出口商还是进口商?本文利用经合组织-欧盟统计局贸易企业特征数据集的数据和估计结构重力模型,研究了欧盟-加拿大全面经济贸易协定(CETA)对欧盟进出口企业数量的影响。在谈判期间讨论其未来影响时,CETA协议是希望和批评的主题,包括其对小企业的潜在负面影响。我们根据行业、企业规模和欧盟国家,探讨了企业对CETA的异质反应。我们发现欧盟企业对CETA协议提供的机会做出了积极而多样的回应。平均而言,CETA使欧盟出口企业的数量增加了约11%。增幅最大的是西班牙和立陶宛(超过30%),而增幅最低的是意大利(8.7%)。小型贸易公司的数量增长一直高于大型公司。这些发现强调了在贸易政策评估中考虑企业层面影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Countries don’t trade, firms do: A firm-level assessment of CETA
The impact of free trade agreements (FTAs) has been analysed by numerous empirical studies that focus on their effect on trade values. But what about the number of trading firms? Do FTAs lead to new firms becoming exporters or importers? Using data from the OECD-Eurostat Trade by Enterprise Characteristics dataset and estimating a structural gravity model, this paper examines the effect of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) on the number of EU exporting and importing firms. When debating its future effects during the negotiations, the CETA agreement was the subject of both hope and criticism, including its potential negative effect on small firms. We explore the heterogeneous response of firms to CETA by sector, firm size and EU country. We find a positive but diverse response from EU firms to the opportunities offered by the CETA agreement. On average, CETA increased the number of EU exporting firms by around 11%. The largest increases were found in Spain and Lithuania (over 30%), while the lowest increases were in Italy (8.7%). The increase in the number of trading firms has been higher for small than for large firms. These findings underscore the importance of considering firm-level impacts in trade policy assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信