双试点政策如何影响企业低碳转型:来自中国能源使用权和碳排放权交易的证据

IF 8.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Zicheng Zhang , Shi Chen , Yixiong Huang
{"title":"双试点政策如何影响企业低碳转型:来自中国能源使用权和碳排放权交易的证据","authors":"Zicheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Shi Chen ,&nbsp;Yixiong Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy use rights and carbon emission rights trading pilot policies are market-based measures designed to address climate challenges by encouraging firms to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. In China, certain regions have implemented both policies simultaneously, giving rise to a dual pilot framework. However, the effect of this coordinated policy arrangement on corporate low-carbon transition (CLT) remains insufficiently examined. This study leverages panel data from China’s A-share listed companies between 2011 and 2021. We construct an optimized-EBM model that incorporates undesirable outputs to measure CLT performance and employ a synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) approach to evaluate how the dual pilot policy impacts CLT. The empirical results demonstrate that the dual pilot policy significantly promotes CLT, with robustness checks supporting this finding. Mechanism analysis reveals two core channels: endogenous drivers—including green innovation, resource allocation, and operational capability; and exogenous responses—such as carbon risk awareness and green strategic orientation. Further heterogeneity tests suggest that the effect of dual pilot policy is more pronounced among private firms, those with higher financing constraints, in more market-oriented regions, and those not subject to green credit restrictions. Importantly, the dual pilot policy exhibits stronger effects than either policy implemented in isolation, enhancing enduring market performance while showing limited short-term impact. These findings offer factual supports for the effectiveness of integrated environmental governance and provide a valuable basis for future sustainable policy coordination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 661-686"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the dual pilot policy impacts corporate low-carbon transition: Evidence from energy use rights and carbon emission rights trading in China\",\"authors\":\"Zicheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Shi Chen ,&nbsp;Yixiong Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy use rights and carbon emission rights trading pilot policies are market-based measures designed to address climate challenges by encouraging firms to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. In China, certain regions have implemented both policies simultaneously, giving rise to a dual pilot framework. However, the effect of this coordinated policy arrangement on corporate low-carbon transition (CLT) remains insufficiently examined. This study leverages panel data from China’s A-share listed companies between 2011 and 2021. We construct an optimized-EBM model that incorporates undesirable outputs to measure CLT performance and employ a synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) approach to evaluate how the dual pilot policy impacts CLT. The empirical results demonstrate that the dual pilot policy significantly promotes CLT, with robustness checks supporting this finding. Mechanism analysis reveals two core channels: endogenous drivers—including green innovation, resource allocation, and operational capability; and exogenous responses—such as carbon risk awareness and green strategic orientation. Further heterogeneity tests suggest that the effect of dual pilot policy is more pronounced among private firms, those with higher financing constraints, in more market-oriented regions, and those not subject to green credit restrictions. Importantly, the dual pilot policy exhibits stronger effects than either policy implemented in isolation, enhancing enduring market performance while showing limited short-term impact. These findings offer factual supports for the effectiveness of integrated environmental governance and provide a valuable basis for future sustainable policy coordination.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 661-686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源使用权和碳排放权交易试点政策是通过鼓励企业提高能源效率和减少碳排放来应对气候挑战的市场化措施。在中国,一些地区同时实施了这两项政策,形成了双重试点框架。然而,这种协调的政策安排对企业低碳转型的影响尚未得到充分的研究。本研究利用了2011年至2021年中国a股上市公司的面板数据。我们构建了一个优化的ebm模型,该模型包含了不期望的输出来衡量CLT的性能,并采用综合差分法(SDID)来评估双试点政策对CLT的影响。实证结果表明,双试点政策显著促进了CLT,鲁棒性检验支持了这一发现。机制分析揭示了两个核心渠道:内生驱动——包括绿色创新、资源配置和运营能力;外生反应——如碳风险意识和绿色战略导向。进一步的异质性检验表明,双重试点政策的效果在私营企业、融资约束程度较高的企业、市场导向程度较高的地区以及不受绿色信贷限制的企业中更为明显。重要的是,双重试点政策比单独实施的任何一项政策都显示出更强的效果,增强了持久的市场表现,但短期影响有限。这些发现为综合环境治理的有效性提供了事实支持,并为未来的可持续政策协调提供了宝贵的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How the dual pilot policy impacts corporate low-carbon transition: Evidence from energy use rights and carbon emission rights trading in China
Energy use rights and carbon emission rights trading pilot policies are market-based measures designed to address climate challenges by encouraging firms to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. In China, certain regions have implemented both policies simultaneously, giving rise to a dual pilot framework. However, the effect of this coordinated policy arrangement on corporate low-carbon transition (CLT) remains insufficiently examined. This study leverages panel data from China’s A-share listed companies between 2011 and 2021. We construct an optimized-EBM model that incorporates undesirable outputs to measure CLT performance and employ a synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) approach to evaluate how the dual pilot policy impacts CLT. The empirical results demonstrate that the dual pilot policy significantly promotes CLT, with robustness checks supporting this finding. Mechanism analysis reveals two core channels: endogenous drivers—including green innovation, resource allocation, and operational capability; and exogenous responses—such as carbon risk awareness and green strategic orientation. Further heterogeneity tests suggest that the effect of dual pilot policy is more pronounced among private firms, those with higher financing constraints, in more market-oriented regions, and those not subject to green credit restrictions. Importantly, the dual pilot policy exhibits stronger effects than either policy implemented in isolation, enhancing enduring market performance while showing limited short-term impact. These findings offer factual supports for the effectiveness of integrated environmental governance and provide a valuable basis for future sustainable policy coordination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信