对网络犯罪受害的恐惧:审视恐惧与受害之间的关系

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
P.A.H. Sarkki (Pirkko) , M.S. van 't Hoff-de Goede (Susanne) , M.A.G. van Leuken (Merel) , S.G.A. van de Weijer (Steve) , E.R. Leukfeldt (Rutger)
{"title":"对网络犯罪受害的恐惧:审视恐惧与受害之间的关系","authors":"P.A.H. Sarkki (Pirkko) ,&nbsp;M.S. van 't Hoff-de Goede (Susanne) ,&nbsp;M.A.G. van Leuken (Merel) ,&nbsp;S.G.A. van de Weijer (Steve) ,&nbsp;E.R. Leukfeldt (Rutger)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the increased use of the internet, cybercrime has grown more prevalent. Simultaneously, fear of cybercrime has increased and warrants more attention in research. This article investigates the temporal relationship between cybercrime fear and victimisation. Quantitative data from Dutch adults (<em>N</em> = 1886), collected at two timepoints, 2019 and 2020, were used. Linear and logistic regression models were conducted to assess whether cybercrime victimisation impacts the fear of cybercrime and vice versa, and whether earlier fear and victimisation predict subsequent fear and victimisation.</div><div>Recent victimisation (within the last year) and previous fear of crime (measured one year before) were found to increase current fear of cybercrime, with previous fear being the strongest predictor. Fear of cybercrime did not significantly impact the risk of victimisation a year later. Notably, earlier victimisation predicted nearly five times higher risk of victimisation a year later. The results show that victimisation may increase fear. However, while fear could motivate people to self-protect, fear does not diminish risk of cybercrime victimisation. Furthermore, the research highlights the prevalence of revictimisation in cybercrime, emphasising the need to focus on previously victimised when designing interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear of cybercrime victimisation: Examining the relationship between fear and victimisation\",\"authors\":\"P.A.H. Sarkki (Pirkko) ,&nbsp;M.S. van 't Hoff-de Goede (Susanne) ,&nbsp;M.A.G. van Leuken (Merel) ,&nbsp;S.G.A. van de Weijer (Steve) ,&nbsp;E.R. Leukfeldt (Rutger)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the increased use of the internet, cybercrime has grown more prevalent. Simultaneously, fear of cybercrime has increased and warrants more attention in research. This article investigates the temporal relationship between cybercrime fear and victimisation. Quantitative data from Dutch adults (<em>N</em> = 1886), collected at two timepoints, 2019 and 2020, were used. Linear and logistic regression models were conducted to assess whether cybercrime victimisation impacts the fear of cybercrime and vice versa, and whether earlier fear and victimisation predict subsequent fear and victimisation.</div><div>Recent victimisation (within the last year) and previous fear of crime (measured one year before) were found to increase current fear of cybercrime, with previous fear being the strongest predictor. Fear of cybercrime did not significantly impact the risk of victimisation a year later. Notably, earlier victimisation predicted nearly five times higher risk of victimisation a year later. The results show that victimisation may increase fear. However, while fear could motivate people to self-protect, fear does not diminish risk of cybercrime victimisation. Furthermore, the research highlights the prevalence of revictimisation in cybercrime, emphasising the need to focus on previously victimised when designing interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001801\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001801","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着互联网使用的增加,网络犯罪变得越来越普遍。同时,对网络犯罪的恐惧也在增加,需要在研究中给予更多的关注。本文研究了网络犯罪恐惧与受害之间的时间关系。研究使用了在2019年和2020年两个时间点收集的荷兰成年人(N = 1886)的定量数据。采用线性和逻辑回归模型来评估网络犯罪受害是否影响对网络犯罪的恐惧,反之亦然,以及早期的恐惧和受害是否预测随后的恐惧和受害。研究发现,最近的受害经历(去年)和之前对犯罪的恐惧(一年前测量)会增加当前对网络犯罪的恐惧,而之前的恐惧是最强的预测因子。一年后,对网络犯罪的恐惧并没有显著影响受害的风险。值得注意的是,较早受害的人在一年后受害的风险要高出近五倍。结果表明,受害可能会增加恐惧。然而,尽管恐惧可以激励人们自我保护,但恐惧并不能降低网络犯罪受害的风险。此外,该研究强调了网络犯罪中再次受害的普遍现象,强调在设计干预措施时需要关注以前的受害者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fear of cybercrime victimisation: Examining the relationship between fear and victimisation
With the increased use of the internet, cybercrime has grown more prevalent. Simultaneously, fear of cybercrime has increased and warrants more attention in research. This article investigates the temporal relationship between cybercrime fear and victimisation. Quantitative data from Dutch adults (N = 1886), collected at two timepoints, 2019 and 2020, were used. Linear and logistic regression models were conducted to assess whether cybercrime victimisation impacts the fear of cybercrime and vice versa, and whether earlier fear and victimisation predict subsequent fear and victimisation.
Recent victimisation (within the last year) and previous fear of crime (measured one year before) were found to increase current fear of cybercrime, with previous fear being the strongest predictor. Fear of cybercrime did not significantly impact the risk of victimisation a year later. Notably, earlier victimisation predicted nearly five times higher risk of victimisation a year later. The results show that victimisation may increase fear. However, while fear could motivate people to self-protect, fear does not diminish risk of cybercrime victimisation. Furthermore, the research highlights the prevalence of revictimisation in cybercrime, emphasising the need to focus on previously victimised when designing interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信