警务人员和督导人员在警察使用武力事件方面的培训所产生的影响

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Hyeyoung Lim , Brian Lawton
{"title":"警务人员和督导人员在警察使用武力事件方面的培训所产生的影响","authors":"Hyeyoung Lim ,&nbsp;Brian Lawton","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to problematic encounters, police agencies have increasingly relied on additional training as a remedy. While specific training is required for all officers within an agency or a state, larger police agencies often offer optional, discretionary training opportunities and newly developed programs. To build on and extend the work of Lim and Lee (2015), this study examines the impacts of topic-specific training and officers' use of force, while also incorporating the training received by their immediate supervisors. Using Response to Resistance (R2R) reports and training records from 2009 to 2017 provided by a large-sized police department in Texas, this study explores how both officer and supervisor training influence force application and the supervisory role in guiding and managing use of force decisions. Three topic-specific trainings focused on this study are on the topics related to the use of force, working with impaired individuals, and issues of race and ethnicity. Given the categorical nature of the dependent variable, clustered multinomial logistic regression models were employed, accounting for the nesting of officers under supervisors. Findings indicate that impairment-related training was generally associated with a reduced likelihood of higher levels of force, while force-specific training was unexpectedly linked to greater odds of using higher levels of force compared to the weaponless force. Supervisor training effects were inconsistent but significant in certain contrasts, underscoring the potential influence of supervisory oversight on officer behavior. Study limitations and recommendations for future studies were further discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of officer and supervisor training in police use of force incidents\",\"authors\":\"Hyeyoung Lim ,&nbsp;Brian Lawton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In response to problematic encounters, police agencies have increasingly relied on additional training as a remedy. While specific training is required for all officers within an agency or a state, larger police agencies often offer optional, discretionary training opportunities and newly developed programs. To build on and extend the work of Lim and Lee (2015), this study examines the impacts of topic-specific training and officers' use of force, while also incorporating the training received by their immediate supervisors. Using Response to Resistance (R2R) reports and training records from 2009 to 2017 provided by a large-sized police department in Texas, this study explores how both officer and supervisor training influence force application and the supervisory role in guiding and managing use of force decisions. Three topic-specific trainings focused on this study are on the topics related to the use of force, working with impaired individuals, and issues of race and ethnicity. Given the categorical nature of the dependent variable, clustered multinomial logistic regression models were employed, accounting for the nesting of officers under supervisors. Findings indicate that impairment-related training was generally associated with a reduced likelihood of higher levels of force, while force-specific training was unexpectedly linked to greater odds of using higher levels of force compared to the weaponless force. Supervisor training effects were inconsistent but significant in certain contrasts, underscoring the potential influence of supervisory oversight on officer behavior. Study limitations and recommendations for future studies were further discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001813\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001813","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了应对有问题的遭遇,警察机构越来越依赖额外的培训作为补救措施。虽然一个机构或一个州的所有警官都需要接受专门的培训,但较大的警察机构通常会提供可选的、自由裁量的培训机会和新开发的项目。为了建立和扩展Lim和Lee(2015)的工作,本研究考察了特定主题培训和官员使用武力的影响,同时也纳入了他们的直接主管接受的培训。利用德克萨斯州一家大型警察部门提供的2009年至2017年的R2R报告和培训记录,本研究探讨了警官和主管培训如何影响武力应用以及监督在指导和管理使用武力决策中的作用。针对这项研究的三个特定主题培训是与使用武力、与残疾人士合作以及种族和民族问题有关的主题。考虑到因变量的分类性质,采用聚类多项逻辑回归模型,考虑主管下的官员筑巢。研究结果表明,与损伤相关的训练通常与使用更高级别武力的可能性降低有关,而与无武器部队相比,针对特定部队的训练出人意料地与使用更高级别武力的可能性有关。主管培训效果不一致,但在某些对比中显著,强调了监管监督对官员行为的潜在影响。进一步讨论了研究的局限性和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of officer and supervisor training in police use of force incidents
In response to problematic encounters, police agencies have increasingly relied on additional training as a remedy. While specific training is required for all officers within an agency or a state, larger police agencies often offer optional, discretionary training opportunities and newly developed programs. To build on and extend the work of Lim and Lee (2015), this study examines the impacts of topic-specific training and officers' use of force, while also incorporating the training received by their immediate supervisors. Using Response to Resistance (R2R) reports and training records from 2009 to 2017 provided by a large-sized police department in Texas, this study explores how both officer and supervisor training influence force application and the supervisory role in guiding and managing use of force decisions. Three topic-specific trainings focused on this study are on the topics related to the use of force, working with impaired individuals, and issues of race and ethnicity. Given the categorical nature of the dependent variable, clustered multinomial logistic regression models were employed, accounting for the nesting of officers under supervisors. Findings indicate that impairment-related training was generally associated with a reduced likelihood of higher levels of force, while force-specific training was unexpectedly linked to greater odds of using higher levels of force compared to the weaponless force. Supervisor training effects were inconsistent but significant in certain contrasts, underscoring the potential influence of supervisory oversight on officer behavior. Study limitations and recommendations for future studies were further discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信