院外心脏骤停结果的城乡差异:一项匈牙利全国性研究

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ádám Pál-Jakab , Bettina Nagy , Boldizsár Kiss , György Pápai , Nora Boussoussou , Béla Merkely , Miklós Constantinovits , Gábor Csató , Péter Sótonyi , Brigitta Szilágyi , Endre Zima
{"title":"院外心脏骤停结果的城乡差异:一项匈牙利全国性研究","authors":"Ádám Pál-Jakab ,&nbsp;Bettina Nagy ,&nbsp;Boldizsár Kiss ,&nbsp;György Pápai ,&nbsp;Nora Boussoussou ,&nbsp;Béla Merkely ,&nbsp;Miklós Constantinovits ,&nbsp;Gábor Csató ,&nbsp;Péter Sótonyi ,&nbsp;Brigitta Szilágyi ,&nbsp;Endre Zima","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes often differ between urban and rural settings, but comprehensive nationwide data from Central-Eastern Europe using uniform data collection and modern confounding control remain limited. We investigated urban–rural disparities in OHCA outcomes in Hungary.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed 130,258 OHCA cases (2018–2023) from the Hungarian National Ambulance Service registry, classified as urban (70.1 %) or rural (29.9 %) using national administrative categories. The primary outcome was on-scene return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM) and continuous response-time modeling using natural cubic splines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall ROSC rate was 9.1 % (urban: 9.4 %, rural: 8.3 %, p &lt; 0.001). After PSM, urban location remained significantly associated with higher survival (OR = 1.26, 95 % CI 1.20–1.32, p &lt; 0.001). EMS response times were significantly longer in rural areas (median 14.9 vs 9.8 min, p &lt; 0.001). Urban survival advantage was most pronounced in cases with shockable rhythms (OR = 1.57, 95 % CI 1.43–1.72), medical-witnessed arrests (OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.20–1.42), and response times ≤8 min (OR = 1.59, 95 % CI 1.44–1.76).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant urban–rural disparities in OHCA on-scene ROSC persist even after accounting for patient and arrest characteristics. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to strengthen the Chain of Survival in rural communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban-rural disparities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: a nationwide Hungarian study\",\"authors\":\"Ádám Pál-Jakab ,&nbsp;Bettina Nagy ,&nbsp;Boldizsár Kiss ,&nbsp;György Pápai ,&nbsp;Nora Boussoussou ,&nbsp;Béla Merkely ,&nbsp;Miklós Constantinovits ,&nbsp;Gábor Csató ,&nbsp;Péter Sótonyi ,&nbsp;Brigitta Szilágyi ,&nbsp;Endre Zima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes often differ between urban and rural settings, but comprehensive nationwide data from Central-Eastern Europe using uniform data collection and modern confounding control remain limited. We investigated urban–rural disparities in OHCA outcomes in Hungary.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed 130,258 OHCA cases (2018–2023) from the Hungarian National Ambulance Service registry, classified as urban (70.1 %) or rural (29.9 %) using national administrative categories. The primary outcome was on-scene return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM) and continuous response-time modeling using natural cubic splines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall ROSC rate was 9.1 % (urban: 9.4 %, rural: 8.3 %, p &lt; 0.001). After PSM, urban location remained significantly associated with higher survival (OR = 1.26, 95 % CI 1.20–1.32, p &lt; 0.001). EMS response times were significantly longer in rural areas (median 14.9 vs 9.8 min, p &lt; 0.001). Urban survival advantage was most pronounced in cases with shockable rhythms (OR = 1.57, 95 % CI 1.43–1.72), medical-witnessed arrests (OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.20–1.42), and response times ≤8 min (OR = 1.59, 95 % CI 1.44–1.76).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant urban–rural disparities in OHCA on-scene ROSC persist even after accounting for patient and arrest characteristics. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to strengthen the Chain of Survival in rural communities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的结果往往在城市和农村环境中有所不同,但使用统一数据收集和现代混杂控制的来自中东欧的综合全国数据仍然有限。我们调查了匈牙利OHCA结果的城乡差异。方法:我们分析了匈牙利国家救护车服务登记处的130,258例OHCA病例(2018-2023),根据国家行政类别将其分类为城市(70.1%)或农村(29.9%)。主要结果是现场自发循环恢复(ROSC)。我们使用自然三次样条进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归、倾向得分匹配(PSM)和连续响应时间建模。结果总ROSC率为9.1%(城镇9.4%,农村8.3%,p < 0.001)。PSM后,城市位置仍然与较高的生存率显著相关(OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.32, p < 0.001)。农村地区EMS反应时间明显更长(中位数14.9 vs 9.8分钟,p < 0.001)。城市生存优势在休克节律(OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.43-1.72)、医学见证的骤停(OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.20-1.42)和反应时间≤8分钟(OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.44-1.76)的病例中最为明显。结论:即使在考虑了患者和骤停特征后,OHCA现场ROSC的显著城乡差异仍然存在。这些发现突出表明,需要采取有针对性的干预措施,加强农村社区的生存链。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urban-rural disparities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: a nationwide Hungarian study

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes often differ between urban and rural settings, but comprehensive nationwide data from Central-Eastern Europe using uniform data collection and modern confounding control remain limited. We investigated urban–rural disparities in OHCA outcomes in Hungary.

Methods

We analysed 130,258 OHCA cases (2018–2023) from the Hungarian National Ambulance Service registry, classified as urban (70.1 %) or rural (29.9 %) using national administrative categories. The primary outcome was on-scene return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM) and continuous response-time modeling using natural cubic splines.

Results

The overall ROSC rate was 9.1 % (urban: 9.4 %, rural: 8.3 %, p < 0.001). After PSM, urban location remained significantly associated with higher survival (OR = 1.26, 95 % CI 1.20–1.32, p < 0.001). EMS response times were significantly longer in rural areas (median 14.9 vs 9.8 min, p < 0.001). Urban survival advantage was most pronounced in cases with shockable rhythms (OR = 1.57, 95 % CI 1.43–1.72), medical-witnessed arrests (OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.20–1.42), and response times ≤8 min (OR = 1.59, 95 % CI 1.44–1.76).

Conclusions

Significant urban–rural disparities in OHCA on-scene ROSC persist even after accounting for patient and arrest characteristics. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to strengthen the Chain of Survival in rural communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信