数字时代的意见领导:纳米和微观影响者的崛起

IF 8.3 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Pawel Korzynski , Olga Protsiuk , Julie Guidry Moulard , Varsha Jain
{"title":"数字时代的意见领导:纳米和微观影响者的崛起","authors":"Pawel Korzynski ,&nbsp;Olga Protsiuk ,&nbsp;Julie Guidry Moulard ,&nbsp;Varsha Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Influencer marketing has emerged as an effective promotional strategy for brands. Despite its importance, determining which influencers are impactful remains a challenge, with many brands relying on the number of influencers’ followers in determining influencer collaboration decisions. However, other metrics may be more discerning. Focusing on nano and micro-influencers within the beauty, fitness, lifestyle, and travel sectors, this research addresses this issue by comparing the effectiveness of influencers’ follower count versus consumers’ perceptions of influencers’ opinion leadership. Through a mixed-methods approach involving qualitative interviews and quantitative analysis, we examine how authenticity, inspiration, and content expertise influence perceptions of opinion leadership and follower counts. The study further investigates the impact of opinion leadership and followers’ counting on followers’ intentions to consume content, recommend influencers, and follow their advice, as well as influencers’ compensation (measured with secondary data). Findings reveal that opinion leadership plays a key mediating role between influencer characteristics and follower outcomes, while follower count shows a negligible mediating impact in comparison. These insights offer practical implications for influencers aiming to establish themselves as credible leaders and for brands seeking effective collaborations. Future research should explore a broader range of influencer categories to validate these findings across diverse contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102328"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinion leadership in a digital age: The rise of nano and micro-influencers\",\"authors\":\"Pawel Korzynski ,&nbsp;Olga Protsiuk ,&nbsp;Julie Guidry Moulard ,&nbsp;Varsha Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Influencer marketing has emerged as an effective promotional strategy for brands. Despite its importance, determining which influencers are impactful remains a challenge, with many brands relying on the number of influencers’ followers in determining influencer collaboration decisions. However, other metrics may be more discerning. Focusing on nano and micro-influencers within the beauty, fitness, lifestyle, and travel sectors, this research addresses this issue by comparing the effectiveness of influencers’ follower count versus consumers’ perceptions of influencers’ opinion leadership. Through a mixed-methods approach involving qualitative interviews and quantitative analysis, we examine how authenticity, inspiration, and content expertise influence perceptions of opinion leadership and follower counts. The study further investigates the impact of opinion leadership and followers’ counting on followers’ intentions to consume content, recommend influencers, and follow their advice, as well as influencers’ compensation (measured with secondary data). Findings reveal that opinion leadership plays a key mediating role between influencer characteristics and follower outcomes, while follower count shows a negligible mediating impact in comparison. These insights offer practical implications for influencers aiming to establish themselves as credible leaders and for brands seeking effective collaborations. Future research should explore a broader range of influencer categories to validate these findings across diverse contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000905\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网红营销已经成为一种有效的品牌推广策略。尽管网红很重要,但确定哪些网红有影响力仍然是一个挑战,许多品牌在决定网红合作决策时依赖于网红的粉丝数量。然而,其他指标可能更有洞察力。本研究聚焦于美容、健身、生活方式和旅游领域的纳米和微观影响者,通过比较影响者的粉丝数量和消费者对影响者意见领导的看法的有效性来解决这个问题。通过包括定性访谈和定量分析在内的混合方法,我们研究了真实性、灵感和内容专业知识如何影响意见领导和追随者数量的看法。本研究进一步调查了意见领导和关注者对关注者消费内容、推荐网红、听从他们建议的意愿的影响,以及网红的补偿(用二手数据衡量)。结果表明,意见领导在影响者特征与追随者结果之间起着关键的中介作用,而追随者数量的中介作用可以忽略不计。这些见解为那些希望将自己塑造为可信领导者的网红和寻求有效合作的品牌提供了实际意义。未来的研究应该探索更广泛的影响者类别,以在不同的背景下验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinion leadership in a digital age: The rise of nano and micro-influencers
Influencer marketing has emerged as an effective promotional strategy for brands. Despite its importance, determining which influencers are impactful remains a challenge, with many brands relying on the number of influencers’ followers in determining influencer collaboration decisions. However, other metrics may be more discerning. Focusing on nano and micro-influencers within the beauty, fitness, lifestyle, and travel sectors, this research addresses this issue by comparing the effectiveness of influencers’ follower count versus consumers’ perceptions of influencers’ opinion leadership. Through a mixed-methods approach involving qualitative interviews and quantitative analysis, we examine how authenticity, inspiration, and content expertise influence perceptions of opinion leadership and follower counts. The study further investigates the impact of opinion leadership and followers’ counting on followers’ intentions to consume content, recommend influencers, and follow their advice, as well as influencers’ compensation (measured with secondary data). Findings reveal that opinion leadership plays a key mediating role between influencer characteristics and follower outcomes, while follower count shows a negligible mediating impact in comparison. These insights offer practical implications for influencers aiming to establish themselves as credible leaders and for brands seeking effective collaborations. Future research should explore a broader range of influencer categories to validate these findings across diverse contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信