Ne Qiang , Tianyun Li , Lijun Jia , Xiaoxi Zhang , Xinyu Feng , Kun Yin , Zelin Zhu , Jinjun Ran , Robert Bergquist , Lefei Han , Xiao-Nong Zhou
{"title":"中国人畜共患病控制能力建设:从单一卫生视角评估需求和差距","authors":"Ne Qiang , Tianyun Li , Lijun Jia , Xiaoxi Zhang , Xinyu Feng , Kun Yin , Zelin Zhu , Jinjun Ran , Robert Bergquist , Lefei Han , Xiao-Nong Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traditional sector-specific approaches are inadequate to effectively address zoonosis control at the human-animal-environment interface, whereas the One Health approach promotes multisectoral collaboration and integrated solutions. To apply this approach, competence enhancement is essential, yet there is insufficient understanding of China's capacity-building under the One Health framework, hindering targeted development of the workforce needed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the gaps and needs of capacity building for zoonosis control in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From December 2023 to April 2024, field investigations were conducted in two Chinese provinces with purposively sampled participants from various administrative sectors. Semi-structured interviews (40–60 minutes) were conducted, with a One Health Capacity Building Framework developed to guide both the design and analysis. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed through iterative thematic analysis. A unified codebook was developed through weekly consensus meetings, and higher-order themes were identified under expert supervision. The final themes were mapped onto the framework and visualized using a heatmap to identify the most prominent gaps and needs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 77 participants were engaged, spanning the human health (44.2 %), animal health (18.2 %), environmental management (20.8 %) and multidisciplinary coordination (16.8 %) sectors. China's One Health capacity building revealed three challenges: (i) Structural fragmentation with divided responsibilities and inadequate cross-sectoral governance mechanisms; (ii) Resource disparities showing severe township-level shortages and persistent funding gaps for critical projects; and (iii) Knowledge deficits including insufficient research on emerging pathogens and training programs lacking practical collaboration components. Critical needs focused on strengthening the grass-root infrastructure, sustaining One Health training programs, and enhancing problem-solving capabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The current status and needs in capacity building for zoonosis prevention in China were identified. The results would provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize prevention and control of China's zoonotic disease and advance global health security through strengthened One Health implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19577,"journal":{"name":"One Health","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101231"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capacity building for zoonosis control in China: Assessing needs and gaps by the one health lens\",\"authors\":\"Ne Qiang , Tianyun Li , Lijun Jia , Xiaoxi Zhang , Xinyu Feng , Kun Yin , Zelin Zhu , Jinjun Ran , Robert Bergquist , Lefei Han , Xiao-Nong Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traditional sector-specific approaches are inadequate to effectively address zoonosis control at the human-animal-environment interface, whereas the One Health approach promotes multisectoral collaboration and integrated solutions. To apply this approach, competence enhancement is essential, yet there is insufficient understanding of China's capacity-building under the One Health framework, hindering targeted development of the workforce needed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the gaps and needs of capacity building for zoonosis control in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From December 2023 to April 2024, field investigations were conducted in two Chinese provinces with purposively sampled participants from various administrative sectors. Semi-structured interviews (40–60 minutes) were conducted, with a One Health Capacity Building Framework developed to guide both the design and analysis. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed through iterative thematic analysis. A unified codebook was developed through weekly consensus meetings, and higher-order themes were identified under expert supervision. The final themes were mapped onto the framework and visualized using a heatmap to identify the most prominent gaps and needs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 77 participants were engaged, spanning the human health (44.2 %), animal health (18.2 %), environmental management (20.8 %) and multidisciplinary coordination (16.8 %) sectors. China's One Health capacity building revealed three challenges: (i) Structural fragmentation with divided responsibilities and inadequate cross-sectoral governance mechanisms; (ii) Resource disparities showing severe township-level shortages and persistent funding gaps for critical projects; and (iii) Knowledge deficits including insufficient research on emerging pathogens and training programs lacking practical collaboration components. Critical needs focused on strengthening the grass-root infrastructure, sustaining One Health training programs, and enhancing problem-solving capabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The current status and needs in capacity building for zoonosis prevention in China were identified. The results would provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize prevention and control of China's zoonotic disease and advance global health security through strengthened One Health implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Health\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771425002678\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771425002678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Capacity building for zoonosis control in China: Assessing needs and gaps by the one health lens
Background
Traditional sector-specific approaches are inadequate to effectively address zoonosis control at the human-animal-environment interface, whereas the One Health approach promotes multisectoral collaboration and integrated solutions. To apply this approach, competence enhancement is essential, yet there is insufficient understanding of China's capacity-building under the One Health framework, hindering targeted development of the workforce needed.
Objective
To assess the gaps and needs of capacity building for zoonosis control in China.
Methods
From December 2023 to April 2024, field investigations were conducted in two Chinese provinces with purposively sampled participants from various administrative sectors. Semi-structured interviews (40–60 minutes) were conducted, with a One Health Capacity Building Framework developed to guide both the design and analysis. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed through iterative thematic analysis. A unified codebook was developed through weekly consensus meetings, and higher-order themes were identified under expert supervision. The final themes were mapped onto the framework and visualized using a heatmap to identify the most prominent gaps and needs.
Results
In total, 77 participants were engaged, spanning the human health (44.2 %), animal health (18.2 %), environmental management (20.8 %) and multidisciplinary coordination (16.8 %) sectors. China's One Health capacity building revealed three challenges: (i) Structural fragmentation with divided responsibilities and inadequate cross-sectoral governance mechanisms; (ii) Resource disparities showing severe township-level shortages and persistent funding gaps for critical projects; and (iii) Knowledge deficits including insufficient research on emerging pathogens and training programs lacking practical collaboration components. Critical needs focused on strengthening the grass-root infrastructure, sustaining One Health training programs, and enhancing problem-solving capabilities.
Conclusion
The current status and needs in capacity building for zoonosis prevention in China were identified. The results would provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize prevention and control of China's zoonotic disease and advance global health security through strengthened One Health implementation.
期刊介绍:
One Health - a Gold Open Access journal.
The mission of One Health is to provide a platform for rapid communication of high quality scientific knowledge on inter- and intra-species pathogen transmission, bringing together leading experts in virology, bacteriology, parasitology, mycology, vectors and vector-borne diseases, tropical health, veterinary sciences, pathology, immunology, food safety, mathematical modelling, epidemiology, public health research and emergency preparedness. As a Gold Open Access journal, a fee is payable on acceptance of the paper. Please see the Guide for Authors for more information.
Submissions to the following categories are welcome:
Virology,
Bacteriology,
Parasitology,
Mycology,
Vectors and vector-borne diseases,
Co-infections and co-morbidities,
Disease spatial surveillance,
Modelling,
Tropical Health,
Discovery,
Ecosystem Health,
Public Health.