人为压力下的生态响应:恢复加纳galamsey活动导致的退化景观-综述

IF 3.9
Kwame Anokye , Lois Okyere Darko
{"title":"人为压力下的生态响应:恢复加纳galamsey活动导致的退化景观-综述","authors":"Kwame Anokye ,&nbsp;Lois Okyere Darko","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Illegal small-scale mining (galamsey) in Ghana has caused severe ecological degradation, including deforestation, soil depletion, biodiversity loss, and water contamination. This review synthesizes existing literature on the environmental impacts of galamsey and evaluates restoration strategies employed in affected landscapes such as the Atewa Range and Offin River Basin. Using a systematic narrative review methodology, peer-reviewed articles, government reports, and grey literature were analyzed to assess degradation patterns, restoration interventions, and implementation challenges. Empirical findings indicate that major rivers, including the Pra and Ankobra, are heavily polluted with mercury and cyanide, exceeding WHO safety limits. Deforestation rates in mining zones have significantly reduced carbon sequestration, contributing to climate vulnerability. Restoration strategies—such as afforestation, biochar application, and phytoremediation—have had mixed success due to weak policy enforcement, financial constraints, and low community engagement. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of global best practices, such as China's policy-driven land reclamation and Brazil's agroforestry-based restoration, into a localized framework for sustainable rehabilitation in Ghana. The findings emphasize the need for adaptive restoration techniques, stronger regulatory mechanisms, and community-inclusive approaches to enhance ecological resilience. Limitations include the reliance on secondary data, highlighting the need for field-based validation of restoration outcomes. Future research should explore long-term ecological monitoring and innovative restoration models specific to Ghana’s socio-environmental conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological responses to anthropogenic stress: Restoring degraded landscapes from galamsey activities in Ghana – A review\",\"authors\":\"Kwame Anokye ,&nbsp;Lois Okyere Darko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Illegal small-scale mining (galamsey) in Ghana has caused severe ecological degradation, including deforestation, soil depletion, biodiversity loss, and water contamination. This review synthesizes existing literature on the environmental impacts of galamsey and evaluates restoration strategies employed in affected landscapes such as the Atewa Range and Offin River Basin. Using a systematic narrative review methodology, peer-reviewed articles, government reports, and grey literature were analyzed to assess degradation patterns, restoration interventions, and implementation challenges. Empirical findings indicate that major rivers, including the Pra and Ankobra, are heavily polluted with mercury and cyanide, exceeding WHO safety limits. Deforestation rates in mining zones have significantly reduced carbon sequestration, contributing to climate vulnerability. Restoration strategies—such as afforestation, biochar application, and phytoremediation—have had mixed success due to weak policy enforcement, financial constraints, and low community engagement. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of global best practices, such as China's policy-driven land reclamation and Brazil's agroforestry-based restoration, into a localized framework for sustainable rehabilitation in Ghana. The findings emphasize the need for adaptive restoration techniques, stronger regulatory mechanisms, and community-inclusive approaches to enhance ecological resilience. Limitations include the reliance on secondary data, highlighting the need for field-based validation of restoration outcomes. Future research should explore long-term ecological monitoring and innovative restoration models specific to Ghana’s socio-environmental conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525002210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525002210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加纳的非法小规模采矿(galamsey)造成了严重的生态退化,包括森林砍伐、土壤枯竭、生物多样性丧失和水污染。本文综合了现有关于galamsey对环境影响的文献,并评估了受影响景观(如Atewa山脉和Offin河流域)的恢复策略。采用系统的叙述性评价方法,对同行评议文章、政府报告和灰色文献进行分析,以评估退化模式、恢复干预措施和实施挑战。实证结果表明,包括普拉河和安科布拉河在内的主要河流受到汞和氰化物的严重污染,超过了世卫组织的安全限制。矿区的森林砍伐率大大降低了碳固存,加剧了气候脆弱性。由于政策执行不力、资金限制和社区参与度低,植树造林、生物炭应用和植物修复等恢复策略成败参半。这项研究的新颖之处在于,它将全球最佳实践(如中国的政策驱动的土地复垦和巴西的基于农林业的恢复)整合到加纳的可持续恢复本地化框架中。研究结果强调需要适应性恢复技术、更强有力的监管机制和社区包容性方法来增强生态弹性。局限性包括对二手数据的依赖,强调需要基于现场的恢复结果验证。未来的研究应探索长期的生态监测和创新的恢复模式,具体到加纳的社会环境条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological responses to anthropogenic stress: Restoring degraded landscapes from galamsey activities in Ghana – A review
Illegal small-scale mining (galamsey) in Ghana has caused severe ecological degradation, including deforestation, soil depletion, biodiversity loss, and water contamination. This review synthesizes existing literature on the environmental impacts of galamsey and evaluates restoration strategies employed in affected landscapes such as the Atewa Range and Offin River Basin. Using a systematic narrative review methodology, peer-reviewed articles, government reports, and grey literature were analyzed to assess degradation patterns, restoration interventions, and implementation challenges. Empirical findings indicate that major rivers, including the Pra and Ankobra, are heavily polluted with mercury and cyanide, exceeding WHO safety limits. Deforestation rates in mining zones have significantly reduced carbon sequestration, contributing to climate vulnerability. Restoration strategies—such as afforestation, biochar application, and phytoremediation—have had mixed success due to weak policy enforcement, financial constraints, and low community engagement. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of global best practices, such as China's policy-driven land reclamation and Brazil's agroforestry-based restoration, into a localized framework for sustainable rehabilitation in Ghana. The findings emphasize the need for adaptive restoration techniques, stronger regulatory mechanisms, and community-inclusive approaches to enhance ecological resilience. Limitations include the reliance on secondary data, highlighting the need for field-based validation of restoration outcomes. Future research should explore long-term ecological monitoring and innovative restoration models specific to Ghana’s socio-environmental conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信