{"title":"从神经解码到设计干预:通过神经成像技术系统回顾人类对建筑空间的情感反应","authors":"Na Li , Nan He , Mengqi Li , Leiqing Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2025.100305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Architectural spaces profoundly shape human emotional states, yet the neural mechanisms underlying spatial-emotional interactions remain underexplored in design frameworks. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 17 neuroimaging studies (2009-2023) to establish methodological paradigms and neural correlates of emotion-driven spatial design. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified three critical findings: (1) Methodological convergence: electroencephalogram dominates neuro-architectural research (83.3 % studies), predominantly paired with virtual reality (66.7 %) for dynamic emotion tracking, while real-world assessments constitute only 8.3 %; (2) Neural mechanisms: Spatial proportions (width-depth ratios), curvilinear forms, and openness significantly modulate relaxation-arousal balance through α/β oscillations and anterior cingulate cortex activation, while aesthetic valuation engages visual-spatial networks (precuneus, middle temporal gyrus) and reward circuits (ventral striatum); (3) Design thresholds: Empirical parameters such as window-to-wall ratios (0.4–0.6) and spatial proportions (1.6:1) emerge as neurophysiological benchmarks for emotion-oriented design. The review highlights an urgent need for multimodal frameworks integrating EEG, fMRI, and behavioral metrics to decode complex spatial interactions. Future research should prioritize longitudinal neural plasticity studies, computational models of design parameter optimization, and neuroevidence-based design guidelines. This work advances a paradigm shift from intuition-driven to neuro-informed spatial design by bridging the gap between neuroscientific insights and architectural practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From neural decoding to design intervention: A systematic review of human emotional responses to architectural spaces through neuroimaging techniques\",\"authors\":\"Na Li , Nan He , Mengqi Li , Leiqing Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wss.2025.100305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Architectural spaces profoundly shape human emotional states, yet the neural mechanisms underlying spatial-emotional interactions remain underexplored in design frameworks. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 17 neuroimaging studies (2009-2023) to establish methodological paradigms and neural correlates of emotion-driven spatial design. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified three critical findings: (1) Methodological convergence: electroencephalogram dominates neuro-architectural research (83.3 % studies), predominantly paired with virtual reality (66.7 %) for dynamic emotion tracking, while real-world assessments constitute only 8.3 %; (2) Neural mechanisms: Spatial proportions (width-depth ratios), curvilinear forms, and openness significantly modulate relaxation-arousal balance through α/β oscillations and anterior cingulate cortex activation, while aesthetic valuation engages visual-spatial networks (precuneus, middle temporal gyrus) and reward circuits (ventral striatum); (3) Design thresholds: Empirical parameters such as window-to-wall ratios (0.4–0.6) and spatial proportions (1.6:1) emerge as neurophysiological benchmarks for emotion-oriented design. The review highlights an urgent need for multimodal frameworks integrating EEG, fMRI, and behavioral metrics to decode complex spatial interactions. Future research should prioritize longitudinal neural plasticity studies, computational models of design parameter optimization, and neuroevidence-based design guidelines. This work advances a paradigm shift from intuition-driven to neuro-informed spatial design by bridging the gap between neuroscientific insights and architectural practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wellbeing Space and Society\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wellbeing Space and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558125000703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558125000703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
From neural decoding to design intervention: A systematic review of human emotional responses to architectural spaces through neuroimaging techniques
Architectural spaces profoundly shape human emotional states, yet the neural mechanisms underlying spatial-emotional interactions remain underexplored in design frameworks. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 17 neuroimaging studies (2009-2023) to establish methodological paradigms and neural correlates of emotion-driven spatial design. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified three critical findings: (1) Methodological convergence: electroencephalogram dominates neuro-architectural research (83.3 % studies), predominantly paired with virtual reality (66.7 %) for dynamic emotion tracking, while real-world assessments constitute only 8.3 %; (2) Neural mechanisms: Spatial proportions (width-depth ratios), curvilinear forms, and openness significantly modulate relaxation-arousal balance through α/β oscillations and anterior cingulate cortex activation, while aesthetic valuation engages visual-spatial networks (precuneus, middle temporal gyrus) and reward circuits (ventral striatum); (3) Design thresholds: Empirical parameters such as window-to-wall ratios (0.4–0.6) and spatial proportions (1.6:1) emerge as neurophysiological benchmarks for emotion-oriented design. The review highlights an urgent need for multimodal frameworks integrating EEG, fMRI, and behavioral metrics to decode complex spatial interactions. Future research should prioritize longitudinal neural plasticity studies, computational models of design parameter optimization, and neuroevidence-based design guidelines. This work advances a paradigm shift from intuition-driven to neuro-informed spatial design by bridging the gap between neuroscientific insights and architectural practice.