评估马站在不同密度和肢体位置的平衡垫上的姿势摇摆

Journal of Equine Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100042
Sandro Colla, Melissa King
{"title":"评估马站在不同密度和肢体位置的平衡垫上的姿势摇摆","authors":"Sandro Colla,&nbsp;Melissa King","doi":"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Balance and stability are relevant biomechanical components of overall health and athletic performance. Proprioceptive balance pads are frequently used in equine rehabilitation programs to improve postural stability.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare the center of pressure (COP) variables in horses standing on varying proprioceptive balance pad densities and configurations.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Controlled clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten healthy horses were used to collect the center of pressure displacement parameters (area, craniocaudal sway, mediolateral sway, and velocity) during quiet stance on force platforms without proprioceptive balance pads and during randomly selected variations in pad densities and limb configurations. COP outcome variables were statistically analyzed using a linear mixed model, followed by Dunnett and Tukey adjusted pairwise comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Medium-density pads in all four limbs induced the greatest COP area displacement, craniocaudal sway, and COP velocity. Soft-density pads in all four limbs resulted in the greatest mediolateral sway. Overall, standing all four limbs on pads regardless of the density produced greater COP variables than placing either forelimbs or hindlimbs on pads. All four limbs placed on medium, soft, and firm-density pads, and forelimbs placed on medium and firm-density pads were statistically different from baseline (no pads).</div></div><div><h3>Main limitations</h3><div>Material properties from different brands and pad shapes may have different results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of this research can inform the development of more effective rehabilitation protocols for postural control training in horses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of postural sway in horses standing on balance pads of varying densities and limb placement\",\"authors\":\"Sandro Colla,&nbsp;Melissa King\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Balance and stability are relevant biomechanical components of overall health and athletic performance. Proprioceptive balance pads are frequently used in equine rehabilitation programs to improve postural stability.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare the center of pressure (COP) variables in horses standing on varying proprioceptive balance pad densities and configurations.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Controlled clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten healthy horses were used to collect the center of pressure displacement parameters (area, craniocaudal sway, mediolateral sway, and velocity) during quiet stance on force platforms without proprioceptive balance pads and during randomly selected variations in pad densities and limb configurations. COP outcome variables were statistically analyzed using a linear mixed model, followed by Dunnett and Tukey adjusted pairwise comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Medium-density pads in all four limbs induced the greatest COP area displacement, craniocaudal sway, and COP velocity. Soft-density pads in all four limbs resulted in the greatest mediolateral sway. Overall, standing all four limbs on pads regardless of the density produced greater COP variables than placing either forelimbs or hindlimbs on pads. All four limbs placed on medium, soft, and firm-density pads, and forelimbs placed on medium and firm-density pads were statistically different from baseline (no pads).</div></div><div><h3>Main limitations</h3><div>Material properties from different brands and pad shapes may have different results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of this research can inform the development of more effective rehabilitation protocols for postural control training in horses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景平衡和稳定是整体健康和运动表现的相关生物力学组成部分。本体感觉平衡垫经常用于马的康复项目,以提高姿势的稳定性。目的比较不同本体感觉平衡垫密度和配置下马站立时的压力中心(COP)变量。研究设计:对照临床试验。方法选用10匹健康马,在无本体感觉平衡垫的静力平台上站立和随机选择垫密度和肢体构型变化时,采集压力位移中心参数(面积、颅侧摆动、中外侧摆动和速度)。采用线性混合模型对COP结局变量进行统计分析,随后进行Dunnett和Tukey校正两两比较。结果四肢中密度垫可引起最大的COP面积位移、颅侧摆动和COP速度。所有四肢的软密度垫导致最大的中外侧摆动。总的来说,无论密度如何,将四肢都放在垫子上比将前肢或后肢放在垫子上产生更大的COP变量。所有四肢都放置在中等、柔软和坚固密度的垫子上,前肢放置在中等和坚固密度的垫子上,与基线(没有垫子)有统计学差异。主要限制不同品牌和垫型的材料性能可能会产生不同的结果。结论本研究结果可以为马的姿势控制训练提供更有效的康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of postural sway in horses standing on balance pads of varying densities and limb placement

Background

Balance and stability are relevant biomechanical components of overall health and athletic performance. Proprioceptive balance pads are frequently used in equine rehabilitation programs to improve postural stability.

Objectives

To compare the center of pressure (COP) variables in horses standing on varying proprioceptive balance pad densities and configurations.

Study design

Controlled clinical trial.

Methods

Ten healthy horses were used to collect the center of pressure displacement parameters (area, craniocaudal sway, mediolateral sway, and velocity) during quiet stance on force platforms without proprioceptive balance pads and during randomly selected variations in pad densities and limb configurations. COP outcome variables were statistically analyzed using a linear mixed model, followed by Dunnett and Tukey adjusted pairwise comparisons.

Results

Medium-density pads in all four limbs induced the greatest COP area displacement, craniocaudal sway, and COP velocity. Soft-density pads in all four limbs resulted in the greatest mediolateral sway. Overall, standing all four limbs on pads regardless of the density produced greater COP variables than placing either forelimbs or hindlimbs on pads. All four limbs placed on medium, soft, and firm-density pads, and forelimbs placed on medium and firm-density pads were statistically different from baseline (no pads).

Main limitations

Material properties from different brands and pad shapes may have different results.

Conclusions

The findings of this research can inform the development of more effective rehabilitation protocols for postural control training in horses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书