电池充电策略的比较评价:热行为和充电性能

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Xiaoqi Zeng , Taotao Li , Huirou Zhang , Long Chen , Jingwen Weng , You Lv , Weixiong Wu
{"title":"电池充电策略的比较评价:热行为和充电性能","authors":"Xiaoqi Zeng ,&nbsp;Taotao Li ,&nbsp;Huirou Zhang ,&nbsp;Long Chen ,&nbsp;Jingwen Weng ,&nbsp;You Lv ,&nbsp;Weixiong Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.127947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a core energy storage component in renewable energy systems, lithium-ion batteries face critical challenges in balancing charging performance with thermal safety. While existing studies have explored conventional charging strategies, systematic experimental comparisons under varying ambient temperatures remain limited. This study presents a comprehensive experimental investigation into the thermal-electrical coupling effects of seven advanced charging strategies, including constant current (CC), multi-stage constant current (MCC), changed multi-stage constant current (CMCC), boost charging (BC), constant power charging (CPC), positive pulse charging (PPC), and positive-negative pulse charging (PNPC), across a wide ambient temperature range (15 °C to 45 °C). The results indicated that BC demonstrated superior performance in terms of thermal uniformity and temperature fluctuation control. Compared to the other charging strategies, BC reduced the maximum temperature rise at the center of the battery surface during charging by up to 39.62 % and improved energy efficiency by as much as 3.74 %, making it particularly suitable for applications with stringent requirements on charging rate and temperature control. Moreover, it was found that the critical ambient temperature range for enhancing energy efficiency was between 25 °C and 45 °C. Additionally, the charging times of BC and CPC were highly sensitive to ambient temperature, suggesting that temperature should be carefully considered when optimizing these two charging strategies. This study provides theoretical support for tailoring charging strategies for lithium-ion batteries in various application scenarios. Moreover, it offers valuable reference for the research and optimization of fast-charging strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 127947"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of battery charging strategies: Thermal behavior and charging performance\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqi Zeng ,&nbsp;Taotao Li ,&nbsp;Huirou Zhang ,&nbsp;Long Chen ,&nbsp;Jingwen Weng ,&nbsp;You Lv ,&nbsp;Weixiong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.127947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As a core energy storage component in renewable energy systems, lithium-ion batteries face critical challenges in balancing charging performance with thermal safety. While existing studies have explored conventional charging strategies, systematic experimental comparisons under varying ambient temperatures remain limited. This study presents a comprehensive experimental investigation into the thermal-electrical coupling effects of seven advanced charging strategies, including constant current (CC), multi-stage constant current (MCC), changed multi-stage constant current (CMCC), boost charging (BC), constant power charging (CPC), positive pulse charging (PPC), and positive-negative pulse charging (PNPC), across a wide ambient temperature range (15 °C to 45 °C). The results indicated that BC demonstrated superior performance in terms of thermal uniformity and temperature fluctuation control. Compared to the other charging strategies, BC reduced the maximum temperature rise at the center of the battery surface during charging by up to 39.62 % and improved energy efficiency by as much as 3.74 %, making it particularly suitable for applications with stringent requirements on charging rate and temperature control. Moreover, it was found that the critical ambient temperature range for enhancing energy efficiency was between 25 °C and 45 °C. Additionally, the charging times of BC and CPC were highly sensitive to ambient temperature, suggesting that temperature should be carefully considered when optimizing these two charging strategies. This study provides theoretical support for tailoring charging strategies for lithium-ion batteries in various application scenarios. Moreover, it offers valuable reference for the research and optimization of fast-charging strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0017931025012827\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0017931025012827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为可再生能源系统的核心储能组件,锂离子电池在平衡充电性能和热安全性方面面临着严峻的挑战。虽然现有的研究探索了传统的充电策略,但在不同环境温度下的系统实验比较仍然有限。本研究对恒流(CC)、多级恒流(MCC)、变多级恒流(CMCC)、升压充电(BC)、恒功率充电(CPC)、正脉冲充电(PPC)和正负脉冲充电(PNPC)等7种先进充电策略在宽环境温度范围(15°C至45°C)下的热电耦合效应进行了全面的实验研究。结果表明,BC在热均匀性和温度波动控制方面表现出优异的性能。与其他充电策略相比,BC在充电过程中将电池表面中心的最大温升降低了39.62%,将能量效率提高了3.74%,特别适合对充电速率和温度控制要求严格的应用。此外,发现提高能源效率的临界环境温度范围在25 ~ 45℃之间。此外,BC和CPC的充电时间对环境温度非常敏感,因此在优化这两种充电策略时应仔细考虑温度因素。本研究为锂离子电池在各种应用场景下定制充电策略提供理论支持。为快速充电策略的研究和优化提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of battery charging strategies: Thermal behavior and charging performance
As a core energy storage component in renewable energy systems, lithium-ion batteries face critical challenges in balancing charging performance with thermal safety. While existing studies have explored conventional charging strategies, systematic experimental comparisons under varying ambient temperatures remain limited. This study presents a comprehensive experimental investigation into the thermal-electrical coupling effects of seven advanced charging strategies, including constant current (CC), multi-stage constant current (MCC), changed multi-stage constant current (CMCC), boost charging (BC), constant power charging (CPC), positive pulse charging (PPC), and positive-negative pulse charging (PNPC), across a wide ambient temperature range (15 °C to 45 °C). The results indicated that BC demonstrated superior performance in terms of thermal uniformity and temperature fluctuation control. Compared to the other charging strategies, BC reduced the maximum temperature rise at the center of the battery surface during charging by up to 39.62 % and improved energy efficiency by as much as 3.74 %, making it particularly suitable for applications with stringent requirements on charging rate and temperature control. Moreover, it was found that the critical ambient temperature range for enhancing energy efficiency was between 25 °C and 45 °C. Additionally, the charging times of BC and CPC were highly sensitive to ambient temperature, suggesting that temperature should be carefully considered when optimizing these two charging strategies. This study provides theoretical support for tailoring charging strategies for lithium-ion batteries in various application scenarios. Moreover, it offers valuable reference for the research and optimization of fast-charging strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer is the vehicle for the exchange of basic ideas in heat and mass transfer between research workers and engineers throughout the world. It focuses on both analytical and experimental research, with an emphasis on contributions which increase the basic understanding of transfer processes and their application to engineering problems. Topics include: -New methods of measuring and/or correlating transport-property data -Energy engineering -Environmental applications of heat and/or mass transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信