{"title":"建筑结构隐含碳限值的动态多因素计算方法及其在中国的应用","authors":"Bing Xia , Jianzhuang Xiao , Xiangshuo Guan , Michael Beer","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Establishing scientifically grounded embodied carbon limits is essential for guiding low-carbon structural design and translating macro-level decarbonization targets into actionable regulatory parameters. Here we propose a dynamic, multi-factor methodology for deriving embodied carbon limits of building structures, accounting for evolving carbon budgets and shifts in their allocation to embodied carbon-related activities in regions with a transitioning construction sector. This methodology integrates top-down budget decomposition with bottom-up benchmarking to respectively determine upper and lower bounds of embodied carbon limits for new construction, renovation, and maintenance. Furthermore, multi-factor adjustments are introduced to customize limits according to building type, regulatory stringency, regional conditions, and lifecycle design requirements. The proposed methodology is demonstrated through an analysis of urban residential building structures in China from 2026 to 2060, which reveals a declining trend in embodied carbon limits over time, and provides reasonable limit ranges corresponding to China’s Five-Year Plans (FYPs), e.g., 320.8–360.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>2</sup> for new construction, 0.96–1.08 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/(m<sup>2</sup>·year) for maintenance, and 56.3–63.0 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>2</sup> for renovation with a moderate level of regulation during the 2026–30 FYP. The analysis also highlights the benefits of construction management in providing a buffer period for limit relaxation, examines the impact of regional disparities on carbon mitigation feasibility-based adjustments, and offers recommendations for low-carbon lifecycle design to ensure compliance with mitigation targets while providing further design flexibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 113788"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic multi-factor approach for deriving embodied carbon limit of building structures: Methodology and application in China\",\"authors\":\"Bing Xia , Jianzhuang Xiao , Xiangshuo Guan , Michael Beer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Establishing scientifically grounded embodied carbon limits is essential for guiding low-carbon structural design and translating macro-level decarbonization targets into actionable regulatory parameters. Here we propose a dynamic, multi-factor methodology for deriving embodied carbon limits of building structures, accounting for evolving carbon budgets and shifts in their allocation to embodied carbon-related activities in regions with a transitioning construction sector. This methodology integrates top-down budget decomposition with bottom-up benchmarking to respectively determine upper and lower bounds of embodied carbon limits for new construction, renovation, and maintenance. Furthermore, multi-factor adjustments are introduced to customize limits according to building type, regulatory stringency, regional conditions, and lifecycle design requirements. The proposed methodology is demonstrated through an analysis of urban residential building structures in China from 2026 to 2060, which reveals a declining trend in embodied carbon limits over time, and provides reasonable limit ranges corresponding to China’s Five-Year Plans (FYPs), e.g., 320.8–360.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>2</sup> for new construction, 0.96–1.08 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/(m<sup>2</sup>·year) for maintenance, and 56.3–63.0 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>2</sup> for renovation with a moderate level of regulation during the 2026–30 FYP. The analysis also highlights the benefits of construction management in providing a buffer period for limit relaxation, examines the impact of regional disparities on carbon mitigation feasibility-based adjustments, and offers recommendations for low-carbon lifecycle design to ensure compliance with mitigation targets while providing further design flexibility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"287 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325012582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325012582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
建立科学依据的具体碳限值对于指导低碳结构设计和将宏观层面的脱碳目标转化为可操作的监管参数至关重要。在这里,我们提出了一个动态的、多因素的方法来推导建筑结构的隐含碳限制,考虑到不断变化的碳预算,以及在建筑部门转型的地区,碳预算分配到隐含碳相关活动的转变。该方法将自上而下的预算分解与自下而上的基准测试相结合,分别确定新建筑、翻新和维护的隐含碳限制的上限和下限。此外,根据建筑类型、监管严格程度、区域条件和生命周期设计要求,引入多因素调整来定制限制。通过对2026年至2060年中国城市住宅结构的分析,揭示了隐含碳限值随时间的下降趋势,并提供了与中国五年计划(FYPs)相对应的合理限制范围,例如,2026年至2030年期间,新建320.8-360.8 kg CO2/m2,维护0.96-1.08 kg CO2/(m2·年),56.3-63.0 kg CO2/m2用于适度调节的改造。该分析还强调了施工管理在为放宽限制提供缓冲期方面的好处,审查了区域差异对基于碳缓解可行性的调整的影响,并提出了低碳生命周期设计建议,以确保遵守缓解目标,同时提供进一步的设计灵活性。
Dynamic multi-factor approach for deriving embodied carbon limit of building structures: Methodology and application in China
Establishing scientifically grounded embodied carbon limits is essential for guiding low-carbon structural design and translating macro-level decarbonization targets into actionable regulatory parameters. Here we propose a dynamic, multi-factor methodology for deriving embodied carbon limits of building structures, accounting for evolving carbon budgets and shifts in their allocation to embodied carbon-related activities in regions with a transitioning construction sector. This methodology integrates top-down budget decomposition with bottom-up benchmarking to respectively determine upper and lower bounds of embodied carbon limits for new construction, renovation, and maintenance. Furthermore, multi-factor adjustments are introduced to customize limits according to building type, regulatory stringency, regional conditions, and lifecycle design requirements. The proposed methodology is demonstrated through an analysis of urban residential building structures in China from 2026 to 2060, which reveals a declining trend in embodied carbon limits over time, and provides reasonable limit ranges corresponding to China’s Five-Year Plans (FYPs), e.g., 320.8–360.8 kg CO2/m2 for new construction, 0.96–1.08 kg CO2/(m2·year) for maintenance, and 56.3–63.0 kg CO2/m2 for renovation with a moderate level of regulation during the 2026–30 FYP. The analysis also highlights the benefits of construction management in providing a buffer period for limit relaxation, examines the impact of regional disparities on carbon mitigation feasibility-based adjustments, and offers recommendations for low-carbon lifecycle design to ensure compliance with mitigation targets while providing further design flexibility.
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.