Zhihan Chen , Wenjng Luo , Yun Kang , Jia Xu , Chenggong Li , Xindi Wang , Yinqiang Zhang , Qiaolin Liu , Heng Mei
{"title":"现实世界中CAR-T治疗血液恶性肿瘤的安全性和有效性的区域差异比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Zhihan Chen , Wenjng Luo , Yun Kang , Jia Xu , Chenggong Li , Xindi Wang , Yinqiang Zhang , Qiaolin Liu , Heng Mei","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of patients with hematologic malignancies. Nevertheless, geographic regions may lead to various outcomes, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), overall response rate (ORR), and complete response rate (CRR). However, the related evidence of real-world studies and systematic analysis remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This meta-analysis aims to compare the real-world incidence of CRS and ICANS, as well as therapeutic outcomes ORR/CRR, in patients with hematologic malignancy treated with CAR-T therapy across different regions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases published up to February 2025. Subgroup analyses were performed based on geographic regions and other factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy corhorts from 4 different regions comprising 9233 patients were included. North America exhibited the highest incidence of CRS at 83 %, surpassing Europe (82 %) and Asia (80 %) significantly (p < 0.01). However, no significant regional differences existed in grade ≥ 3 CRS. The incidence of ICANS was notably higher in North America (39 %) compared to Europe (32 %) and Asia (21 %; p = 0.08), with grade ≥ 3 ICANS also more prevalent in North America (16 %) than in Europe (9 %) and Asia (2 %; p < 0.01). Efficacy did not vary across different regions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients in North America possessing elevated rates of CRS and grade ≥ 3 ICANS. The results provide valuable insights to the adverse effects when treating patients with CAR-T therapy across different regions in a real-world setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 104969"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of regional differences in safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy for hematologic malignancies in a real-world setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zhihan Chen , Wenjng Luo , Yun Kang , Jia Xu , Chenggong Li , Xindi Wang , Yinqiang Zhang , Qiaolin Liu , Heng Mei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of patients with hematologic malignancies. Nevertheless, geographic regions may lead to various outcomes, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), overall response rate (ORR), and complete response rate (CRR). However, the related evidence of real-world studies and systematic analysis remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This meta-analysis aims to compare the real-world incidence of CRS and ICANS, as well as therapeutic outcomes ORR/CRR, in patients with hematologic malignancy treated with CAR-T therapy across different regions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases published up to February 2025. Subgroup analyses were performed based on geographic regions and other factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy corhorts from 4 different regions comprising 9233 patients were included. North America exhibited the highest incidence of CRS at 83 %, surpassing Europe (82 %) and Asia (80 %) significantly (p < 0.01). However, no significant regional differences existed in grade ≥ 3 CRS. The incidence of ICANS was notably higher in North America (39 %) compared to Europe (32 %) and Asia (21 %; p = 0.08), with grade ≥ 3 ICANS also more prevalent in North America (16 %) than in Europe (9 %) and Asia (2 %; p < 0.01). Efficacy did not vary across different regions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients in North America possessing elevated rates of CRS and grade ≥ 3 ICANS. The results provide valuable insights to the adverse effects when treating patients with CAR-T therapy across different regions in a real-world setting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825003579\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825003579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of regional differences in safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy for hematologic malignancies in a real-world setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of patients with hematologic malignancies. Nevertheless, geographic regions may lead to various outcomes, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), overall response rate (ORR), and complete response rate (CRR). However, the related evidence of real-world studies and systematic analysis remains limited.
Objective
This meta-analysis aims to compare the real-world incidence of CRS and ICANS, as well as therapeutic outcomes ORR/CRR, in patients with hematologic malignancy treated with CAR-T therapy across different regions.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases published up to February 2025. Subgroup analyses were performed based on geographic regions and other factors.
Results
Seventy corhorts from 4 different regions comprising 9233 patients were included. North America exhibited the highest incidence of CRS at 83 %, surpassing Europe (82 %) and Asia (80 %) significantly (p < 0.01). However, no significant regional differences existed in grade ≥ 3 CRS. The incidence of ICANS was notably higher in North America (39 %) compared to Europe (32 %) and Asia (21 %; p = 0.08), with grade ≥ 3 ICANS also more prevalent in North America (16 %) than in Europe (9 %) and Asia (2 %; p < 0.01). Efficacy did not vary across different regions.
Conclusion
Patients in North America possessing elevated rates of CRS and grade ≥ 3 ICANS. The results provide valuable insights to the adverse effects when treating patients with CAR-T therapy across different regions in a real-world setting.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.