Isabella Tao Jakobsen , Marleen C. Onwezen , Yawei Wang , Fang Zhong , Derek Victor Byrne , Barbara Vad Andersen
{"title":"跨文化消费者对可持续富含蛋白质食品的接受程度;豆类,植物性肉类类似物和混合物,以及细胞食品","authors":"Isabella Tao Jakobsen , Marleen C. Onwezen , Yawei Wang , Fang Zhong , Derek Victor Byrne , Barbara Vad Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese (<em>n</em> = 672) and Danish (<em>n</em> = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105714"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Tao Jakobsen , Marleen C. Onwezen , Yawei Wang , Fang Zhong , Derek Victor Byrne , Barbara Vad Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese (<em>n</em> = 672) and Danish (<em>n</em> = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002897\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods
As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese (n = 672) and Danish (n = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.