跨文化消费者对可持续富含蛋白质食品的接受程度;豆类,植物性肉类类似物和混合物,以及细胞食品

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Isabella Tao Jakobsen , Marleen C. Onwezen , Yawei Wang , Fang Zhong , Derek Victor Byrne , Barbara Vad Andersen
{"title":"跨文化消费者对可持续富含蛋白质食品的接受程度;豆类,植物性肉类类似物和混合物,以及细胞食品","authors":"Isabella Tao Jakobsen ,&nbsp;Marleen C. Onwezen ,&nbsp;Yawei Wang ,&nbsp;Fang Zhong ,&nbsp;Derek Victor Byrne ,&nbsp;Barbara Vad Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese (<em>n</em> = 672) and Danish (<em>n</em> = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105714"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Tao Jakobsen ,&nbsp;Marleen C. Onwezen ,&nbsp;Yawei Wang ,&nbsp;Fang Zhong ,&nbsp;Derek Victor Byrne ,&nbsp;Barbara Vad Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese (<em>n</em> = 672) and Danish (<em>n</em> = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002897\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着世界人口的持续增长,采取更可持续的饮食行为对缓解气候退化至关重要。该研究旨在调查中国(n = 672)和丹麦(n = 272)消费者对可持续富含蛋白质替代品的接受程度。这是通过在两份相同的在线调查中提出三类可持续替代品来完成的:豆类、植物性肉类类似物和杂交产品,以及细胞食品。研究发现,与丹麦人相比,中国参与者对所包括的食物类别更熟悉,对环保行为的态度更积极,豆类和植物性肉类类似物及杂交品种的消费频率更高。两位参与者对豆类的接受度最高,其次是植物性肉类类似物和杂交食品,最后是细胞食品。相比之下,以细胞为基础的食物似乎对中国参与者更有希望,而丹麦参与者在几个方面对植物性肉类类似物和杂交产品的看法更为负面。我们还评估了不同食物类别、膳食类型、身体和社会背景下的消费场景的适宜性,揭示了不同参与者的偏好。豆类对参与者来说是更合适的食物选择。总体而言,中国参与者对可持续富含蛋白质的食物表现出更开放的态度,而丹麦参与者则表现出更不情愿的态度。这项研究的结果为消费者对可持续富含蛋白质的食物的看法的跨文化差异提供了有价值的见解,并强调了研究各种消费驱动因素和障碍的必要性。它系统地调查了;豆类、植物性肉类类似物和杂交种以及细胞食品,以便在未来的研究和政策制定中进行深入比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods
As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese (n = 672) and Danish (n = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信