增强织物的全厚度压实响应:测试标准的制定

IF 8.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
A.X.H. Yong , A. Endruweit , A. George , D. May , Y.A. Aksoy , M.A. Ali , T. Allen , M. Bender , M. Bodaghi , B. Caglar , H. Caglar , A. Chiminelli , S. Comas-Cardona , R. de Ribains , J. Dittmann , C. Dransfeld , E. Fauster , A. Guilloux , P. Hubert , S. Idapalapati , O. Yuksel
{"title":"增强织物的全厚度压实响应:测试标准的制定","authors":"A.X.H. Yong ,&nbsp;A. Endruweit ,&nbsp;A. George ,&nbsp;D. May ,&nbsp;Y.A. Aksoy ,&nbsp;M.A. Ali ,&nbsp;T. Allen ,&nbsp;M. Bender ,&nbsp;M. Bodaghi ,&nbsp;B. Caglar ,&nbsp;H. Caglar ,&nbsp;A. Chiminelli ,&nbsp;S. Comas-Cardona ,&nbsp;R. de Ribains ,&nbsp;J. Dittmann ,&nbsp;C. Dransfeld ,&nbsp;E. Fauster ,&nbsp;A. Guilloux ,&nbsp;P. Hubert ,&nbsp;S. Idapalapati ,&nbsp;O. Yuksel","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Characterisation of the compaction response of reinforcement fabrics is an important component in the design of composite manufacturing processes. To standardise a best practice method, 22 international organisations participated in an exercise to assess the viability and reproducibility of the method discussed in this work. All participants were supplied with the same multiaxial E-glass fibre non-crimp fabric and instructed to measure the compaction stress as a function of the specimen thickness following a set of guidelines. The scatter in results between participants was quantified in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV). The CV of the maximum compaction stress determined at a target specimen thickness of 3 mm (for 10 fabric layers) was 42 % for dry specimens and 46 % for wet specimens, however this was influenced by scatter in the thickness values, which deviated from the target. The CV of the specimen thickness at a compaction stress of 10<sup>5</sup> Pa was 4 %. In addition, a power law model and a model based on bending of beams were fitted to the compaction curves. Both generally produced fits with high values of the coefficient of determination. The observed level of scatter is thought to be caused by issues with the implementation of the procedures and by variability in the specimen properties, as well as the very steep variation of the force/thickness curve at the required target. The guidelines used here aim to minimise inaccuracies in the test method and will be proposed as a test protocol for standardisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":282,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109348"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Through-thickness compaction response of reinforcement fabrics: Development of a test standard\",\"authors\":\"A.X.H. Yong ,&nbsp;A. Endruweit ,&nbsp;A. George ,&nbsp;D. May ,&nbsp;Y.A. Aksoy ,&nbsp;M.A. Ali ,&nbsp;T. Allen ,&nbsp;M. Bender ,&nbsp;M. Bodaghi ,&nbsp;B. Caglar ,&nbsp;H. Caglar ,&nbsp;A. Chiminelli ,&nbsp;S. Comas-Cardona ,&nbsp;R. de Ribains ,&nbsp;J. Dittmann ,&nbsp;C. Dransfeld ,&nbsp;E. Fauster ,&nbsp;A. Guilloux ,&nbsp;P. Hubert ,&nbsp;S. Idapalapati ,&nbsp;O. Yuksel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Characterisation of the compaction response of reinforcement fabrics is an important component in the design of composite manufacturing processes. To standardise a best practice method, 22 international organisations participated in an exercise to assess the viability and reproducibility of the method discussed in this work. All participants were supplied with the same multiaxial E-glass fibre non-crimp fabric and instructed to measure the compaction stress as a function of the specimen thickness following a set of guidelines. The scatter in results between participants was quantified in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV). The CV of the maximum compaction stress determined at a target specimen thickness of 3 mm (for 10 fabric layers) was 42 % for dry specimens and 46 % for wet specimens, however this was influenced by scatter in the thickness values, which deviated from the target. The CV of the specimen thickness at a compaction stress of 10<sup>5</sup> Pa was 4 %. In addition, a power law model and a model based on bending of beams were fitted to the compaction curves. Both generally produced fits with high values of the coefficient of determination. The observed level of scatter is thought to be caused by issues with the implementation of the procedures and by variability in the specimen properties, as well as the very steep variation of the force/thickness curve at the required target. The guidelines used here aim to minimise inaccuracies in the test method and will be proposed as a test protocol for standardisation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X25006426\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X25006426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增强织物的压实响应特性是复合材料制造工艺设计中的一个重要组成部分。为了使最佳实践方法标准化,22个国际组织参加了一项评估本工作中讨论的方法的可行性和可重复性的工作。所有参与者都提供了相同的多轴e -玻璃纤维无卷曲织物,并指示测量压实应力作为试样厚度的函数,遵循一套指导方针。受试者之间结果的散点用变异系数(CV)来量化。在目标试样厚度为3毫米(10层织物)时,干燥试样的最大压实应力CV值为42%,湿试样的CV值为46%,但这受到偏离目标的厚度值分散的影响。在105 Pa压实应力下,试样厚度的CV值为4%。此外,还建立了幂律模型和基于梁弯曲的模型来拟合压实曲线。这两种方法的拟合结果通常都具有较高的决定系数。观察到的散射水平被认为是由程序的实施问题和试样特性的可变性引起的,以及在所需目标处力/厚度曲线的非常陡峭的变化。此处使用的指南旨在最大限度地减少测试方法中的不准确性,并将作为标准化测试协议提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Through-thickness compaction response of reinforcement fabrics: Development of a test standard
Characterisation of the compaction response of reinforcement fabrics is an important component in the design of composite manufacturing processes. To standardise a best practice method, 22 international organisations participated in an exercise to assess the viability and reproducibility of the method discussed in this work. All participants were supplied with the same multiaxial E-glass fibre non-crimp fabric and instructed to measure the compaction stress as a function of the specimen thickness following a set of guidelines. The scatter in results between participants was quantified in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV). The CV of the maximum compaction stress determined at a target specimen thickness of 3 mm (for 10 fabric layers) was 42 % for dry specimens and 46 % for wet specimens, however this was influenced by scatter in the thickness values, which deviated from the target. The CV of the specimen thickness at a compaction stress of 105 Pa was 4 %. In addition, a power law model and a model based on bending of beams were fitted to the compaction curves. Both generally produced fits with high values of the coefficient of determination. The observed level of scatter is thought to be caused by issues with the implementation of the procedures and by variability in the specimen properties, as well as the very steep variation of the force/thickness curve at the required target. The guidelines used here aim to minimise inaccuracies in the test method and will be proposed as a test protocol for standardisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
492
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing is a comprehensive journal that publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies, short communications, and letters covering various aspects of composite materials science and technology. This includes fibrous and particulate reinforcements in polymeric, metallic, and ceramic matrices, as well as 'natural' composites like wood and biological materials. The journal addresses topics such as properties, design, and manufacture of reinforcing fibers and particles, novel architectures and concepts, multifunctional composites, advancements in fabrication and processing, manufacturing science, process modeling, experimental mechanics, microstructural characterization, interfaces, prediction and measurement of mechanical, physical, and chemical behavior, and performance in service. Additionally, articles on economic and commercial aspects, design, and case studies are welcomed. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review to ensure they contribute significantly and innovatively, maintaining high standards for content and presentation. The editorial team aims to expedite the review process for prompt publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信