成熟梧桐树根系修剪响应的优化

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Andrew R. Benson , Justin Morgenroth
{"title":"成熟梧桐树根系修剪响应的优化","authors":"Andrew R. Benson ,&nbsp;Justin Morgenroth","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pruning is a critical cultural practice in arboriculture. A long history of research and experience has informed current best practices on the timing and methods used during branch pruning. But comparatively little is known about root pruning. To improve our understanding, three roots from each of 32 mature <em>Platanus x acerifolia</em> (Aiton) Wild trees were exposed via air spade and severed. Root pruning was undertaken in October 2020 and April 2021, representing Southern Hemisphere spring and autumn pruning timings, respectively. Roots were pruned internodally or at a junction (to a side root). Together, these effects resulted in four treatments: I-S (internodal pruning in spring), I-A (internodal pruning in autumn), J-S (junction pruning in spring), and J-A (junction pruning in autumn). Three years after these treatments were imposed, pruned roots were re-exposed with the air spade, excised, and regrowth and discolouration responses were measured. Most new roots grew within 10 mm of the pruning cut, around the traumatic cambium and in callus tissue formed in this zone. The number of new roots produced following root pruning was affected only by position (internode, junction), where roots pruned internodally produced an average of 26.93 new roots in contrast to the junction roots’ average of 19.44. The percentage of the cut roots' cross-sectional area (CSA) recovered by new root regrowth was significantly affected by position, and the interaction between position and season. Roots pruned internodally produced 2.5 times more of the cut root's CSA than the junction roots. The greatest amount of the cut roots’ CSA was regrown by roots pruned internodally in spring, which recovered 17.93 %. When the severed roots were dissected longitudinally through the central axis, internal wood discolouration following root pruning was significantly affected by season but not position. Roots cut in spring had significantly more discolouration than roots cut in autumn. Overall, the least amount of wood discolouration was seen when roots were cut back to a side root in autumn (J-A). In this experiment, optimising the response of London plane trees to root pruning depended on whether the desired outcome was to maximise or minimise root regrowth, which could be achieved by pruning roots internodally in autumn (I-A), or to a side root in autumn (J-A), respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129103"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising root pruning responses in mature Platanus x acerifolia trees\",\"authors\":\"Andrew R. Benson ,&nbsp;Justin Morgenroth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pruning is a critical cultural practice in arboriculture. A long history of research and experience has informed current best practices on the timing and methods used during branch pruning. But comparatively little is known about root pruning. To improve our understanding, three roots from each of 32 mature <em>Platanus x acerifolia</em> (Aiton) Wild trees were exposed via air spade and severed. Root pruning was undertaken in October 2020 and April 2021, representing Southern Hemisphere spring and autumn pruning timings, respectively. Roots were pruned internodally or at a junction (to a side root). Together, these effects resulted in four treatments: I-S (internodal pruning in spring), I-A (internodal pruning in autumn), J-S (junction pruning in spring), and J-A (junction pruning in autumn). Three years after these treatments were imposed, pruned roots were re-exposed with the air spade, excised, and regrowth and discolouration responses were measured. Most new roots grew within 10 mm of the pruning cut, around the traumatic cambium and in callus tissue formed in this zone. The number of new roots produced following root pruning was affected only by position (internode, junction), where roots pruned internodally produced an average of 26.93 new roots in contrast to the junction roots’ average of 19.44. The percentage of the cut roots' cross-sectional area (CSA) recovered by new root regrowth was significantly affected by position, and the interaction between position and season. Roots pruned internodally produced 2.5 times more of the cut root's CSA than the junction roots. The greatest amount of the cut roots’ CSA was regrown by roots pruned internodally in spring, which recovered 17.93 %. When the severed roots were dissected longitudinally through the central axis, internal wood discolouration following root pruning was significantly affected by season but not position. Roots cut in spring had significantly more discolouration than roots cut in autumn. Overall, the least amount of wood discolouration was seen when roots were cut back to a side root in autumn (J-A). In this experiment, optimising the response of London plane trees to root pruning depended on whether the desired outcome was to maximise or minimise root regrowth, which could be achieved by pruning roots internodally in autumn (I-A), or to a side root in autumn (J-A), respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 129103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725004376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725004376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

修剪是树木栽培中重要的文化实践。长期的研究历史和经验已经告知当前的最佳做法的时间和方法在树枝修剪期间使用。但相对而言,人们对根修剪知之甚少。为了提高我们的认识,我们用空气铲对32棵成熟的白桦(Platanus x acerifolia, Aiton)野生树的每棵树的3根进行了暴露和切断。根修剪分别在2020年10月和2021年4月进行,分别代表南半球的春季和秋季修剪时间。根在节间或在交界处被修剪(对侧根)。结果表明:1 - s(春季节间修剪)、1 - a(秋季节间修剪)、J-S(春季节间修剪)和J-A(秋季节间修剪)4种处理均具有上述效应。施用这些处理三年后,修剪后的根用空气铲重新暴露,切除,并测量再生和变色反应。大多数新根生长在剪枝处10 mm以内、外伤形成层周围和该区域形成的愈伤组织中。根修剪后产生的新根数量仅受位置(节间、交接处)的影响,其中节间修剪的根平均产生26.93根新根,而交接处的根平均产生19.44根。新根再生恢复的断根截面积(CSA)百分比受位置和位置与季节的交互作用影响显著。节间修剪的根产生的CSA比结根多2.5倍。春季节间修剪的根系再生CSA最多,恢复17.93 %。当切断的根经中轴纵向解剖时,根部修剪后的木材内部变色受季节影响显著,而不受位置影响。春切根的变色程度明显高于秋切根。总的来说,当根在秋天被切回侧根时,木材变色的数量最少(J-A)。在本实验中,优化伦敦梧桐树对根系修剪的响应取决于期望的结果是最大化还是最小化根系再生,这可以通过在秋季分别修剪节间根(I-A)或秋季修剪侧根(J-A)来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimising root pruning responses in mature Platanus x acerifolia trees
Pruning is a critical cultural practice in arboriculture. A long history of research and experience has informed current best practices on the timing and methods used during branch pruning. But comparatively little is known about root pruning. To improve our understanding, three roots from each of 32 mature Platanus x acerifolia (Aiton) Wild trees were exposed via air spade and severed. Root pruning was undertaken in October 2020 and April 2021, representing Southern Hemisphere spring and autumn pruning timings, respectively. Roots were pruned internodally or at a junction (to a side root). Together, these effects resulted in four treatments: I-S (internodal pruning in spring), I-A (internodal pruning in autumn), J-S (junction pruning in spring), and J-A (junction pruning in autumn). Three years after these treatments were imposed, pruned roots were re-exposed with the air spade, excised, and regrowth and discolouration responses were measured. Most new roots grew within 10 mm of the pruning cut, around the traumatic cambium and in callus tissue formed in this zone. The number of new roots produced following root pruning was affected only by position (internode, junction), where roots pruned internodally produced an average of 26.93 new roots in contrast to the junction roots’ average of 19.44. The percentage of the cut roots' cross-sectional area (CSA) recovered by new root regrowth was significantly affected by position, and the interaction between position and season. Roots pruned internodally produced 2.5 times more of the cut root's CSA than the junction roots. The greatest amount of the cut roots’ CSA was regrown by roots pruned internodally in spring, which recovered 17.93 %. When the severed roots were dissected longitudinally through the central axis, internal wood discolouration following root pruning was significantly affected by season but not position. Roots cut in spring had significantly more discolouration than roots cut in autumn. Overall, the least amount of wood discolouration was seen when roots were cut back to a side root in autumn (J-A). In this experiment, optimising the response of London plane trees to root pruning depended on whether the desired outcome was to maximise or minimise root regrowth, which could be achieved by pruning roots internodally in autumn (I-A), or to a side root in autumn (J-A), respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信