Leonardo Becchetti , Gabriele Beccari , Gianluigi Conzo , Pierluigi Conzo , Davide De Santis , Francesco Salustri
{"title":"COVID-19封锁对空气质量的有争议的环境影响:来自意大利各城市的证据","authors":"Leonardo Becchetti , Gabriele Beccari , Gianluigi Conzo , Pierluigi Conzo , Davide De Santis , Francesco Salustri","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the effect of Italy's first wave COVID-19 lockdown on air quality across municipalities by means of a unified panel specification. We use a continuous province-level mobility index from Google and explicitly separate three channels: reduced outdoor mobility, additional residential heating on cold days, and the legally mandated, asynchronous shutdown of centralised heating across climatic zones. Consistent with expectations, restrictions sharply lowered mobility and increased time spent at home. The overall impact on particulate matter is non-linear and reflects the balance between these forces. During March 2020, intensified home heating coincided with an unusual rise in particulate matter relative to the same months in previous years. The effect reversed in April–May when centralised heating was switched off by law, a pattern corroborated by a regression-discontinuity design around shutdown dates. Nitrogen dioxide declined markedly, in line with reduced traffic and other outdoor activities. A time-series decomposition of the fitted values quantifies the daily contributions of the three channels and reconciles the contrasting March versus April–May patterns. We refrain from short-run policy claims that require assumptions on the electricity mix; our results document and quantify the mechanisms through which the lockdown affected air quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108904"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The controversial environmental effects of COVID-19 lockdown on quality of air: evidence from Italian municipalities\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Becchetti , Gabriele Beccari , Gianluigi Conzo , Pierluigi Conzo , Davide De Santis , Francesco Salustri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article examines the effect of Italy's first wave COVID-19 lockdown on air quality across municipalities by means of a unified panel specification. We use a continuous province-level mobility index from Google and explicitly separate three channels: reduced outdoor mobility, additional residential heating on cold days, and the legally mandated, asynchronous shutdown of centralised heating across climatic zones. Consistent with expectations, restrictions sharply lowered mobility and increased time spent at home. The overall impact on particulate matter is non-linear and reflects the balance between these forces. During March 2020, intensified home heating coincided with an unusual rise in particulate matter relative to the same months in previous years. The effect reversed in April–May when centralised heating was switched off by law, a pattern corroborated by a regression-discontinuity design around shutdown dates. Nitrogen dioxide declined markedly, in line with reduced traffic and other outdoor activities. A time-series decomposition of the fitted values quantifies the daily contributions of the three channels and reconciles the contrasting March versus April–May patterns. We refrain from short-run policy claims that require assumptions on the electricity mix; our results document and quantify the mechanisms through which the lockdown affected air quality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007315\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The controversial environmental effects of COVID-19 lockdown on quality of air: evidence from Italian municipalities
This article examines the effect of Italy's first wave COVID-19 lockdown on air quality across municipalities by means of a unified panel specification. We use a continuous province-level mobility index from Google and explicitly separate three channels: reduced outdoor mobility, additional residential heating on cold days, and the legally mandated, asynchronous shutdown of centralised heating across climatic zones. Consistent with expectations, restrictions sharply lowered mobility and increased time spent at home. The overall impact on particulate matter is non-linear and reflects the balance between these forces. During March 2020, intensified home heating coincided with an unusual rise in particulate matter relative to the same months in previous years. The effect reversed in April–May when centralised heating was switched off by law, a pattern corroborated by a regression-discontinuity design around shutdown dates. Nitrogen dioxide declined markedly, in line with reduced traffic and other outdoor activities. A time-series decomposition of the fitted values quantifies the daily contributions of the three channels and reconciles the contrasting March versus April–May patterns. We refrain from short-run policy claims that require assumptions on the electricity mix; our results document and quantify the mechanisms through which the lockdown affected air quality.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.